I'm down to Paul or Huckabee
I won't vote for McCain, Clinton or Obama, and I'm uncomfortable with Romney. I'm angry with some of Pauls remarks, and I don't have a lot of confidence in Huckabee. That being said, it's either Paul or Huckabee since Hunter is no longer in the running. Guess I've got some hard decisions coming up.
Man, this leaves a fellow in a real pickle! I want a person who will seal the borders, agressively fight the war on terrorism OVER THERE, support the constitution and keep taxes under control. I also want them to control spending and stop the robbing of the social security system as well as not socialize nedicine in the US.
No one comes to mind.
Man, this leaves a fellow in a real pickle! I want a person who will seal the borders, agressively fight the war on terrorism OVER THERE, support the constitution and keep taxes under control. I also want them to control spending and stop the robbing of the social security system as well as not socialize nedicine in the US.
No one comes to mind.
0
-
quote:Originally posted by Spider7115
Well, no matter who wins, we thankfully still have a system of "checks and balances". The President doesn't make the the laws. If your Presidential candidate doesn't win, put the pressure on your Congressional Reps and Senators to remind them who put them there and who can take them out.
That & twenty-five cents might get you a very cheap cup of coffee.
The Democrats are going to have a majority in both houses of Congress. The only question will be if the Republicans can hold onto
fourty seats in the Senate.
If either Obama or Clinton becomes President we will have Hell to pay.
The liberals in the Republican Pary pulled this kind of I won't play stunt back in 1964 & the result was they lost all influence in the party. If the conservatives try the same stunt they may face the same result.0 -
quote:If it weren't for Paul wanting to pull out of Iraq I'd be for him
Regardless of your opinion on Iraq 2 things come into play here that that Paul simply can't ignore and maintain his integrity 1) It is an unconstitutional undeclared war plain and simple. 2) we cannot afford 1 trillion dollars a year to sustain this BS. If they really wanted our system of govt. they would have embraced it quickly. I doubt ANY muslim wants our system of govt. It's time for them to prove it if they do. We have to go and hope like heck we didn't stay too long to financially recover.
9 Trillion dollar debt...one candidate is talking about it, ONE! The others are busy promising to spend even more monopoly money.0 -
quote:Originally posted by Alpine
Yes, I liked Hunter the best. But he is not in the race anymore.
Romney may frighten some, but I like his core conservative beliefs.
And measured up against McKennedy or ClintObama, there is no question which way I will vote.
Romney is an enemy of the Second Amendment.0 -
Alpine, I live in CT just below MA. I have many friends in MA who would rather shoot themselves in the foot than vote for Romney.These people have to live with his totaly rediculus gun laws.The man is just as anti-gun as any Democrat running. 0 -
quote:Originally posted by Highball
quote:Well, no matter who wins, we thankfully still have a system of "checks and balances". The President doesn't make the the laws
Well..excuse me.
Laws. yet...
We are in Iraq because of bush.
We have gun Courts because of bush.
We have Patriot Acts..because of bush
We have briefs filed in Second Amendment cases..because of bush
We have all our phones tapped..because of bush.
we fully funded the UN..because of bush.
We have drastically increased BATF funding..because of bush.
I could go on and on..but whatever is the use.
Those insisting on being blind...will remain so.
He did all of those things all by himself? WOW! [:0] And here I thought Congress, the Senate, the CIA, TSA and the Cabinet were involved. [:(!] Boy, do I feel dumb. Thanks for the education!0
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Comments
35 comments