Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

I'm new here

Comments

43 comments

  • berkeley223
    not really, but i just had a terrible urge to say it[:D]

    SGT USMC
    SSGT USAF
    The greatest happiness is to see your enemy scattered before you, to see his village in ashes, and to gather to your bed his wives and daughters.-Genghis Khan 1226
    0
  • berkeley223
    Worried about the direction this country is heading and a possible Democratic president.
    Also I think we are going to be hit be al qeada if hillary or obama win.
    I really want to prepare myself for the worst.
    Protection of me and my family is key.
    Suggestions of what to buy to get ready?
    0
  • RMW2008
    Originally posted by berkeley223
    Worried about the direction this country is heading and a possible Democratic president.
    Also I think we are going to be hit be al qeada if hillary or obama win.
    I really want to prepare myself for the worst.
    Protection of me and my family is key.
    Suggestions of what to buy to get ready?
    0
  • kumate
    berkely,I have read your post on politics and you have some good thoughts.My thoughts on what to buy for Arrmagedon.Choose the rifle you already have that is comfortable and you can shoot accurately and buy all the ammo you can get.that and a good shotgun should do the trick
    0
  • chumchum
    HI, YOur at the right site, but wrong topic page!!! Try general discussion page or the ask the expert page. You will get some really good suggestions!!!!!!
    0
  • Permanently deleted user
    Welcome aboard.
    0
  • woodshermit
    After 8 years of the gang that is in the White House; somebody is worried about the Democrats.
    0
  • Sav99
    There won't be anyone to shoot at. They will shut down all ammo and reloading products. The manufactures will be taxed and regulated out of business. There will be no door to door weapons seizure.
    The few shoot outs that will occur, will only serve to further the "domestic terrorist" idea in the media.
    0
  • allen griggs
    As someone said, guns and ammo.
    After that, food and water.
    Buy a Corona hand cranked grain grinder, and buy a bunch of 5 gallon buckets of oat groats, whole corn, and hard red winter wheat.
    MREs or freeze dried food is a waste of money.


    http://www.samandy.com/
    0
  • Doc
    woodshermit- When I voted for Bush in 2000 I knew he would not be a great president. He proved to be a little worse than I expected but I was voting for the lesser of two evils. Same situation in 2004. If I had to do it over again I would. Knowing how bad Bush is I would still prefer him to either Gore or Kerry who both in my opinion would have been far, far worse.

    Looks like the same thing in 2008. Guiliani? Romney? McCain? Yuck.

    Obama? Clinton? If these are my choices then give me any of the former three any day. Third party? That was done in 1992 and 1996 and all it did was ensure victory for Bill Clinton with less than half the votes both times. I have to be realistic and vote for the best choice on the ballot. You ask if somebody is worried about Democrats after 8 years of the Bush Administration? Yup. Right here. I am plenty worried.

    As for the original question, at my current age and health I know I would not survive long in the post-apocalyptic environment some envision. But were I to prepare for such a scenario, I would want an AR15 and a 9mm pistol for urban survival involving fighting off gangs of thugs.

    In the woods I would want a .223 bolt rifle with a scope and the same handgun. In the wild there would be more hunting than engaging in firefights. Why these guns? Ammo supply. Same caliber as our military uses so these might the best choices for scavenging ammo over time.

    If possible I would add a shotgun with a variety of ammo for hunting and close defense work. I have a Mossberg 500 with a 20" barrel using multiple choke tubes that would be nearly perfect. But packing around two long guns over an extended period of foraging and evasion might not be realistic. If limited to only one gun it would be the shotgun. No one gun can do everything but a shotgun can do more than any other one gun.

    But like I said, this is pure fantasy on my part. I would be among the first ones to die and I know it.
    0
  • allen griggs
    Interesting post, Saxon Pig.
    When I moved up to the North Carolina mountains 12 years ago it was, in part, to have a place to hole up if tshtf.
    I was a healthy young 45 year old man.
    Since then my health has gone to hell, I am joined at the hip to the health food store and the pharmacy for supplements and prescriptions.
    So if the shtf I simply wouldn't last too long.
    But, at least my girlfriend could get along here. She has a daughter who has a husband and two kids in Atlanta.
    Atlanta like most big cities would be a good place to suffer and die in this scenario, so, at least, they could come up here and make a go of it.
    Son in law is pretty handy with guns, I have taught him well.
    0
  • Doc
    Anyone on sustaining meds has a problem in the urban survival scenario. I guess your first stop would be to loot a pharmacy and stock up as best as possible.

    In reality only the young and strong would have any chance at survival. I am neither.
    0
  • Mossbergboogie
    Democrat as president might be no worse than certain republicans as far as the second amendment goes.
    0
  • Fatstrat
    I'd say buy a good .22LR also. Bulk ammo is $10. per 550 rds and you can stock up alot w/o a large investment.
    You'll want something you can use to take game for the table w/o drawing much attenion. And a well placed shot w/a .22LR will take most N. American game reliably.
    0
  • wundudnee
    Boots, socks and whiskey.
    0
  • cowdoc
    I fail to see any difference in either party.....sorry
    0
  • tomahawk
    quote:Originally posted by SaxonPig
    woodshermit- When I voted for Bush in 2000 I knew he would not be a great president. He proved to be a little worse than I expected but I was voting for the lesser of two evils. Same situation in 2004. If I had to do it over again I would. Knowing how bad Bush is I would still prefer him to either Gore or Kerry who both in my opinion would have been far, far worse.

    Looks like the same thing in 2008. Guiliani? Romney? McCain? Yuck.

    Obama? Clinton? If these are my choices then give me any of the former three any day. Third party? That was done in 1992 and 1996 and all it did was ensure victory for Bill Clinton with less than half the votes both times. I have to be realistic and vote for the best choice on the ballot. You ask if somebody is worried about Democrats after 8 years of the Bush Administration? Yup. Right here. I am plenty worried.

    As for the original question, at my current age and health I know I would not survive long in the post-apocalyptic environment some envision. But were I to prepare for such a scenario, I would want an AR15 and a 9mm pistol for urban survival involving fighting off gangs of thugs.

    In the woods I would want a .223 bolt rifle with a scope and the same handgun. In the wild there would be more hunting than engaging in firefights. Why these guns? Ammo supply. Same caliber as our military uses so these might the best choices for scavenging ammo over time.

    If possible I would add a shotgun with a variety of ammo for hunting and close defense work. I have a Mossberg 500 with a 20" barrel using multiple choke tubes that would be nearly perfect. But packing around two long guns over an extended period of foraging and evasion might not be realistic. If limited to only one gun it would be the shotgun. No one gun can do everything but a shotgun can do more than any other one gun.

    But like I said, this is pure fantasy on my part. I would be among the first ones to die and I know it.







    saxon...are you gonna move this to political forum[:(!]

    It's borderline. May get moved. Thank you for your concern but I am watching it.
    0
  • Sav99
    I almost wonder how much power any president has anymore where many issues are concerned. If we are under the thumb of the world bank because they hold our debt. If a president is told to do this or that or else, for example, the Chinese will cash in all their U.S. bonds and bankrupt our system, don't you think his hands are tied? I don't know if this is the case, but it would explain NAFTA.
    0
  • River Rat
    Saxon Pig: I'm with you. I don't agree with half of Bush's positions, but I consider him an honorable man and am not ashamed to say I voted for him twice.

    Like Linus waiting in the pumpkin patch for the Great Pumpkin to appear, I am awaiting for The Next Reagan to appear. Sorry, Ron Paul isn't him by a longshot. Hunter is, but he's not even showing up on the radar. Fred? I dunno.

    Yes, I would take this to the Politics Discussion, but it's scary over there.
    0
  • spryor
    quote:Originally posted by cowdoc
    I fail to see any difference in either party.....sorry
    Same here.
    0
  • Doc
    Consider Roberts and Alito, Bush's two appointments to the Supreme Court.

    Who would have been nominated by a Democrat?

    There is a difference.

    Small, but there.
    0
  • 1911a1-fan
    quote:woodshermit- When I voted for Bush in 2000 I knew he would not be a great president. He proved to be a little worse than I expected but I was voting for the lesser of two evils. Same situation in 2004

    remember the lesser of two evils is still evil, and i'm sure if 4 years with one of the other evils could possibly be worse the 8 years with this one
    0
  • Doc
    Do you have an alternative?

    If my choice is Obama or Guiliani I grit my teeth and vote for Rudy.

    Do you have a viable alternative?

    If my choice is Clinton or Romney I hold my nose and vote for Mitt.

    Do you have a viable alternative?

    Sometimes the lesser of two evils (acknowledging that both are evil) is the best we can do.
    0
  • HeavyBarrel
    quote:Originally posted by SaxonPig
    Do you have an alternative?

    If my choice is Obama or Guiliani I grit my teeth and vote for Rudy.

    Do you have a viable alternative?

    If my choice is Clinton or Romney I hold my nose and vote for Mitt.

    Do you have a viable alternative?

    Sometimes the lesser of two evils (acknowledging that both are evil) is the best we can do.
    Hell no.............
    0
  • Doc
    Don't keep it to yourself.

    What's your plan?
    0
  • VinhlongVet71
    I never thought I'd say this,,,,, but I sure do miss Nixon
    0
  • Highball
    Get the first 100 issues of Mother Earth News.
    Get the Foxfire series of books.

    If you have no background of country living, you have your work cut out for you.
    "The Worst"...covers many eventualities. YOU have to decide for yourself what the 'Worst' might be..then fill in the gaps in your plan.
    'Protection for your family' involved far more then guns..medical, food, water, predators,shelter,heat for said dwelling...it can be overwhelming, looking at the elephant. But you eat an elephant one bite at a time...
    0
  • Captplaid
    I think Rudy is history.


    Would Romney or McCain nomintate a Roberts or Alito??

    Doubtful.

    More like a Kennedy or Souter.[xx(]

    Who hijacked this thread toward politics anyway. Awh heck, who cares. Lets just keep talking where it belongs, in GD.
    0
  • dheffley
    Why does the user ID say "berkeley223" and the edited by line say "Edited by - Old Fool on 01/19/2008 10:51:48 AM"

    Is Old Fool and berkeley223 one in the same?
    0
  • berkeley223
    Nope, I'm not old fool, someone moved my post from one thread to another so maybe that's what happened?

    anyway this is a great forum--nice gathering place of true americans!
    thanks for your suggestions by the way!
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity