Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

Just a heads up...selling without a license

Comments

45 comments

  • Horse Plains Drifter
    Wow, sorry to hear about your friend.
    0
  • fordsix
    seems clear in the federal regulations i wonder how some gunshow sellers never get the same??
    0
  • Ditch-Runner
    sorry to here sounds like they were looking for a fall guy


    a old fellow down the road from me I would guess late 70's early 80's
    has been a trader of just about anything for ever traded and sold lots of guns I stopped by and talked with him a few times great fellow retired but always like to trade
    I bet he had 150+ rifles and shotguns lined the wall of his 3 car garage . nothing great just used run of the mill truck hunting guns you would not need to worry about rust or scratches [B)] not couting all the you name it its here items [:0]
    a few years back when a gun or ammo were like hens teeth word got around fellows were travailing 50 to 100 miles to buy guns from him
    BATF caught wind raided his place in full force several trucks and cars
    full of agents they took all the guns even the ones he was working on for friends close to 200+ guns I think it was about 90K in cash his pension and his wife had passed a short time before so he had all the cash at home .
    he got off loosing all the guns not allowed to have another gun and XX years probation no jail time
    I think he got most of the cash back and due to his age and circumstances
    something about just being a old fellow and his hobby that just got out of control on him , was how it came down , he still wheels and deals but no guns
    0
  • mogley98
    The Federal laws do not prohibit someone from selling their personal collection or selling to change up your collection, obviously if you are buying and selling to make a profit than you are a dealer.

    Could be a gray line but you probably need a good attorney and lots of money to win that one.
    0
  • spasmcreek
    sometimes ya dance on the edge and fall off the cliff...TS
    0
  • cce1302
    Remember to vote for more government tomorrow. More of your guys will be better masters than more of their guys.
    0
  • jimdeere
    CS, your friend will probably end up losing more than the scumbag that did the murder.
    0
  • WMClark
    This is the exact reason I reapplied for another FFL a few years back when I decided to thin out my herd some.

    Form different stories I've heard there really is no set number as to how many of your personal firearm you can sell before they can claim you are a dealer.

    I fully agree with Ditch-Runner that they were looking for a fall guy.
    0
  • Locust Fork
    The part I do not understand is how they came to the conclusion that he was operating as a dealer by looking into one gun sale??? I understand they were tracing the one gun back through the hands that it went through, but how did they find out that he had bought and sold guns regularly?
    0
  • jimdeere
    "I bought that gun at the flea market. I don't remember the guy's name."
    0
  • kidthatsirish
    Anytime F-Troop can make themselves look useful or like they actually deter crime they will.

    Even at the expense of honest folks.

    Not sure how any patriotic American with a red, white and blue soul work for them.
    0
  • Grasshopper
    Yea, that's seems very harsh. The guy got hosed very bad IMO and do time!! Hell, they have convicted felons who harmed people do probation. IMO, he got rolled.
    Yea, yea, don't quote regulations of the BATF to me. He was steamrolled and with no priors, B.S.[:(]
    0
  • Rocky Raab
    I carefully read the OP several times and believe that the salient part is "he has been buying and selling firearms for the past few years".

    In short, he was doing exactly what he was charged with.
    0
  • bpost
    Pigs get fed hogs get slaughtered.
    0
  • nmyers
    Never underestimate what a supervisory FLEO will do to justify his annual Merit Pay bonus.

    Remember, this is an agency that couldn't find a single person involved in buying 2,000 rifles (at taxpayer expense) & giving them to the Mexican drug gangs.

    Neal
    0
  • mrmike08075
    quote:Originally posted by Rocky Raab
    I carefully read the OP several times and believe that the salient part is "he has been buying and selling firearms for the past few years".

    In short, he was doing exactly what he was charged with.


    It's not likely that this type of behavior was facilitated by emails or online forum discussions or popular for sale public web sites or auction sites or social media (twitter - instagram - reddit - my space - etc)

    And left an associated trail of evidence and activity easily accessible to a public or private investigator

    Or that someone he did business with outside of the local county state regional or national / federal law did something wrong or got busted and rolled on the subject of this post

    Or that some dem lib prog alt left social justice warrior snowflake witnessed any activity and dimed him out

    Mike
    0
  • JamesRK
    Your friend SHOULD get a GOOD lawyer who knows or can read and understand the law and have him look into the loss of military retired pay. They can mess with ?disability? retirement within limits IF he is actually incarcerated (LOCKED UP). I believe you have to be convicted of treason to forfeit regular retired pay.

    Of course as usual I could be wrong (but I don?t think so).
    0
  • bustedknee
    There has to be more to the story....Is this the guy?

    https://www.justice.gov/usao-edwi/pr/janesville-man-charged-dealing-firearms-without-license
    0
  • remingtonoaks
    quote:Originally posted by Locust Fork
    The part I do not understand is how they came to the conclusion that he was operating as a dealer by looking into one gun sale??? I understand they were tracing the one gun back through the hands that it went through, but how did they find out that he had bought and sold guns regularly?


    No doubt they investigated everybody that gun was traced to
    0
  • 11b6r
    FWIW- the ATF does not address "profit". The term is "engaging in the business" of buying and selling guns. Their definition is devoting time and attention to making a livelihood.

    I have an M1 carbine. Find a better specimen, buy it, decide to sell the one I have- NOT engaging in the business.

    I buy a crate of 5 Mosin-Nagants. Pick the one I like best and sell the other 4 right away. REAL shaky ground, and will likely be considered engaging in the business.

    I am at a gun show, selling off some guns I no longer want. Someone offers me a Browning Hi-Power for $100. I buy it, and immediately put it on the table with a $500 tag. THAT has gotten a few folks arrested (ATF sting)

    Having said that, I am not a lawyer. If you get arrested I will NOT be standing next to you in court.
    0
  • remingtonoaks
    Well if you said he's been buying and selling guns for the last few years, it sounds like he's been doing it as a business. I don't believe in gun laws, but they are still on the books. And you should be smart enough not to break them.and if you're not smart enough not to break them, then I guess you'll have to live with the consequences.
    0
  • Junkballer
    That does seems like a harsh sentence for a older retired military guy, never committed a crime in his life but......don't convince yourself he didn't know what he was doing was wrong, he knew and got caught. More than likely he pissed the ATF agents off during the initial investigation with attitude and then they played hard ball with him.
    0
  • mlincoln
    quote:Originally posted by Junkballer
    That does seems like a harsh sentence for a older retired military guy, never committed a crime in his life but......don't convince yourself he didn't know what he was doing was wrong, he knew and got caught. More than likely he pissed the ATF agents off during the initial investigation with attitude and then they played hard ball with him.


    Or he was offered a much more lenient sentence and insisted upon going to trial or delaying the process, and after being found guilty got the hammer.

    If you're buying and selling guns for the past few years, that sounds an awful lot like being in the business of buying and selling guns without an FFL. And doing that without putting aside some money for an attorney or an NRA membership and some legal assistance or SOMETHING----that's just dumb.

    If you want to know who ratted him out, I'd start looking at local FFLs and gun shop owners. They have the most to lose from folks undercutting their business.

    Sorry, that isn't what you want to hear, but I honestly don't view this as a tragic case.
    0
  • shootuadeal
    11b6r pretty much sums it up.

    There are ways to tell if someone is "repeatedly buying and reselling" which throws up the "dealing without a license flag"

    One is if you purchase more than one handgun within 5 days from an FFL. There is a report of multiple handgun purchase filled out and faxed into the ATF that is looked at and stored on hand. If they are getting several of these with a certain persons name on it and later these guns are showing up on gun traces it is a pretty good indication that the person is reselling them.

    Another scenario regarding the multiple sales forms is if the person keeps buying common pistols, like 5 Glock .40s at one time, then a few weeks later buy 5 more. I can guarantee that someone that buys 10 Hi-point cf380s on one transaction will most likely get a visit from the police or ATF within a few hours[:0]

    Anyway, the gun laws are on the books, if you aren't selling guns often enough to be on their radar you are fine. If you are selling enough guns to be on their radar you should probably just get an FFL and then you don't have to worry about it. Thats what kills me, these gun show sellers with 100 guns on display and no FFL, they are playing with fire, obviously they are in the business or have an interest in buying and selling guns, why don't they just get the damn FFL instead of getting their guns confiscated and a jail term, doesn't make sense to me.
    0
  • David Nunn
    That sucks for your friend.

    Several years ago, I had to go to Phoenix to testify in the trial of an "unlicensed dealer." Seems I had sold him a gun, shipped it to him through his dealer, and later he sold it for profit at a gun show. Mine was just one. He did this a lot.

    After I testified and was no longer under the rule, I observed the rest of the trial. It appeared that the government made a pretty good case against the unlicensed dealer, and I figured he was a goner, but the jury found him NOT GUILTY.

    I think what saved him was that he got ID from all his buyers, and recorded that information, along with information on the gun purchased, on a legal pad.

    The government wasted no telling how many tax dollars and man-hours on this case. It cost them several hundred dollars to get me there and back, and house and feed me for two days, and there were several other FFL witnesses.

    And even though our suspect was found not guilty, he had to spend tens of thousands of dollars on his legal defense, and he will forevermore be on the BATFE radar.

    And you can go to any gun show, and see exhibitors doing the same thing, over and over. I can't see that the profit is worth the risk. If I ever give up my FFL, I'm out of the business altogether.
    0
  • roswellnative
    Sorry for your friend but the money would not be worth the risk for me to buy and try to resell guns for a profit.
    Sad
    0
  • JamesRK
    quote:Originally posted by Junkballer
    That does seems like a harsh sentence for a older retired military guy, never committed a crime in his life but......don't convince yourself he didn't know what he was doing was wrong, he knew and got caught. More than likely he pissed the ATF agents off during the initial investigation with attitude and then they played hard ball with him.

    What he did was illegal. Not wrong. There is a difference.
    0
  • He Dog
    quote:I think what saved him was that he got ID from all his buyers, and recorded that information, along with information on the gun purchased, on a legal pad.

    While I do the same for my records, I sell very seldom and always through my transfer ffl. I could see this if he did it a lot as being evidence of his being a dealer without benefit of a license. I wonder how the jury saw it differently.
    0
  • cce1302
    quote:Originally posted by Junkballer
    That does seems like a harsh sentence for a older retired military guy, never committed a crime in his life but......don't convince yourself he didn't know what he was doing was wrong, he knew and got caught. More than likely he pissed the ATF agents off during the initial investigation with attitude and then they played hard ball with him.


    There's a difference between wrong and illegal. What he did was illegal.

    I don't know what the law is in wisconsin about private sales, but he probably answered too many questions and incriminated himself.

    The real travesty is that we allow legislators to criminalize victimless transactions between private individuals. and that there are active participants in the gun community (and this thread) that applaud such nonsense.
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity