"Putin's C@#k Holster"
So most have heard Steve Colbert's unhinged rant on television the other night. Too many double standards here to list but I would like to make this one ironic observation.
The gist of Colbert's rant is twofold, he was saying that (a) It's a bad thing that Trump's in bed with Putin and (b) that it is bad to have another man's unit in your mouth.
So where are the light loafered libtards on this one? Where is the LGBT outcry? How is Mr. Colbert NOT swinging from a Starbucks rafter?
This is because either on a conscious or subconscious level slights like this can be overlooked because the person being attacked is (a) non socialist, (b) straight or (c) white.
Marginalized and kicked to the curb, the target on the waspy man's back grows ever larger. The writing is on the wall.
The gist of Colbert's rant is twofold, he was saying that (a) It's a bad thing that Trump's in bed with Putin and (b) that it is bad to have another man's unit in your mouth.
So where are the light loafered libtards on this one? Where is the LGBT outcry? How is Mr. Colbert NOT swinging from a Starbucks rafter?
This is because either on a conscious or subconscious level slights like this can be overlooked because the person being attacked is (a) non socialist, (b) straight or (c) white.
Marginalized and kicked to the curb, the target on the waspy man's back grows ever larger. The writing is on the wall.
0
-
quote:Originally posted by Jgreen
"You express a high level of support for a crass and obscene comment about the president...but are upset about ad hominem. That is just silly enough to almost be cute."
What's silly is that you don't know what an ad hominem attack is. It's not just a personal insult. It is a personal insult in lieu of a response to an argument.
Seems to me that you haven't been following this discussion. Here's the Cliff's notes version:
1. President insults a reporter in a craven and cowardly manner.
2. Colbert, a comedian, roasts him over his conduct, including a "fact based" insult, which is funny because Trump has a fetish for dictators, and the act of which he has been deemed suitable for is one that is commonly associated with subservience.
3. People claim to be bent out of shape over Colbert's remarks.
4. I explain why the remarks are well-deserved.
5. Rather than take issue with what I said, a personal insult is made. That, folks, is an ad hominem argument.
You seem unable to grasp the idea that because you say something, doesn't make it true. Claiming something is "reality", or stating that you have "explained why the remarks are well-deserved" has little relation to accuracy.
You made a silly little rant typical of a leftist with it's panties still bunched over an election loss. It isn't exactly what one considers an intellectual tour de force. I am sure you can look up what that means.0 -
quote:Originally posted by droptop
Quote: Marginalized and kicked to the curb, the target on the waspy man's back grows ever larger. The writing is on the wall.
Who/what is the waspy man?
What writing is on the wall?
Waspy as in white Anglo Saxon Protestant. The writing on the wall means it's open season on old white guys.0 -
quote:Originally posted by CaptFun
I went to high school with that asshat. Had more than enough of his bs then.
Trump or Colbert?0 -
quote:Originally posted by interstatepawnllc
quote:Originally posted by droptop
Quote: Marginalized and kicked to the curb, the target on the waspy man's back grows ever larger. The writing is on the wall.
Who/what is the waspy man?
What writing is on the wall?
Waspy as in white Anglo Saxon Protestant. The writing on the wall means it's open season on old white guys.
Who are you taking about and what writing is on the wall?0 -
quote:Originally posted by Jgreen Dads3040
Advanced Member
USA
12161 Posts
Posted - 05/05/2017 : 3:20:54 PM Show Profile Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Jgreen
As far as I'm concerned, Colbert's rant was the x ring.
It is patently obvious that trump is a bullshi--er who has a chubby for tyrants and tyranny.
trump mistakes rudeness and cruelty for strength, as you would expect a cowering little man to do.
I think that trumps' success is that he is the weak man's idea of what a strong man would be, and he sells that shi- to people who don't know any better. He also lucked out, in that the democrats ran a terrible candidate, and there were people who voted for him while clearly holding their nose, because they didn't want the alternative.
Did you actually see his interview with Face the Nation, that led up to the smackdown?
If you didn't see it, the interviewer asks Trump, while they are in the Oval office, "Do you still believe that Obama had you wiretapped?"
Trump says "I have my own opinions".
The interviewer says "But you're the president, and I'm interested in your opinions."
Trump then says "This interview is over" and walks over to the desk, that has maybe 10 sheets of paper on it. He sits down and pretends to read them, shuffles them a bit, and "fumfers" around with them, being ever so busy with these obviously important documents. It is staggeringly pathetic.
As far as I'm concerned, the president doesn't get to insult people because he's the president. The best part of it is that one of the questions before trump pulled this pathetic little move was that the interviewer said something about a former president (Bush 1? I can't remember...) was that "the scary thing about the oval office is that there are no corners to hide in", to which trump replied "well, it is an oval, that's right..."
Outrage is cheap currency. The people who are "offended" at the idea of trump fellating putin are missing that it is a dominance thing, as opposed to a "happy" thing.
Always a treat to see the moral bankruptcy and intellectual vacancy of the left clearly displayed.
Always a disappointment to see the moral bankruptcy and feebleness of those who support trump and resort to ad hominem attacks when faced with reality...
you being politically naive and historically ignorant makes your comments the equivalent of a blind man yelling about bright lights.0 -
quote:Originally posted by Jgreen
As far as I'm concerned, Colbert's rant was the x ring.
It is patently obvious that trump is a bullshi--er who has a chubby for tyrants and tyranny.
trump mistakes rudeness and cruelty for strength, as you would expect a cowering little man to do.
I think that trumps' success is that he is the weak man's idea of what a strong man would be, and he sells that shi- to people who don't know any better. He also lucked out, in that the democrats ran a terrible candidate, and there were people who voted for him while clearly holding their nose, because they didn't want the alternative.
Did you actually see his interview with Face the Nation, that led up to the smackdown?
If you didn't see it, the interviewer asks Trump, while they are in the Oval office, "Do you still believe that Obama had you wiretapped?"
Trump says "I have my own opinions".
The interviewer says "But you're the president, and I'm interested in your opinions."
Trump then says "This interview is over" and walks over to the desk, that has maybe 10 sheets of paper on it. He sits down and pretends to read them, shuffles them a bit, and "fumfers" around with them, being ever so busy with these obviously important documents. It is staggeringly pathetic.
As far as I'm concerned, the president doesn't get to insult people because he's the president. The best part of it is that one of the questions before trump pulled this pathetic little move was that the interviewer said something about a former president (Bush 1? I can't remember...) was that "the scary thing about the oval office is that there are no corners to hide in", to which trump replied "well, it is an oval, that's right..."
Outrage is cheap currency. The people who are "offended" at the idea of trump fellating putin are missing that it is a dominance thing, as opposed to a "happy" thing.
politically naive and historically ignorant is no way to go through life.0
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Comments
36 comments