The Bomber has a name now
The Press is calling whomever is building and sending out the bombs the MAGAbomber[xx(]
I am so sick and tired of these libtard journalists they are fricking sick.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6315709/Robert-Niros-Tribeca-restaurant-evacuated-suspicious-package-found.html
Oh yea and I guess Deniro got one sent to his restaurant.
I am so sick and tired of these libtard journalists they are fricking sick.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6315709/Robert-Niros-Tribeca-restaurant-evacuated-suspicious-package-found.html
Oh yea and I guess Deniro got one sent to his restaurant.
0
-
quote:Originally posted by mag00...
One is an offensive position and the other is a defensive position. As a person who frequents a firearms forum, surely you understand the difference.
I wouldn't say "frequent" any more. I just come here to get a little insight into the tRumpian mind.
And please forgive me for not adding my cite to my original post. I've fixed that. Now, maybe you can do the same. It'll help me understand your viewpoint.0 -
They got a suspect now.
It looks like he is a Trumpy supporter.
He has a van covered in political stickers.
Typical Nut Job. He is just a suspect.
0 -
quote:Originally posted by us55840
Until PROVEN incorrect, I hold this whole bomb thing is fake.
Simply dredged up by the liberals to gin up sympathy, make the R's look guilty (only sent to liberal dems) and in their mind, give them an edge in the Nov election.
The liberal media is putting max spin on the story and the non-thinking sheeple will fall in line, possibly.
I find politics, especially of late, very [}:)]
[?] IF these were sent thru the mail and delivered by the mailman, why are, in the pictures seen so far, none of the postage stamps cancelled [?]
Do you see a ruse?
Agree Cause has even one went off Accidentally. Have they ever came out and said these were active Bombs could they go off. What was supposed to trigger them.0 -
yessiree bob...it is criminal to allow TRUMP to defend himself ???? 0 -
quote:Originally posted by Colonel Plink
quote:Originally posted by shilowar
I have not heard Trump once encourage violence, certainly nothing approaching the message of Democrat political leaders. Calling CNN fake NEWS in no way advocates violence. Dems and media have been trying to make this stretch that Trumps advocates violence when he has said the opposite. If I am wrong, or have missed a direction to violence by Trump as comparable to obvious calls for violence by Democrats please post it here.
On Feb. 23, 2016, during a campaign rally in Las Vegas, Trump said of a heckler who was being ejected from the building, ?He?s walking out with big high-fives, smiling, laughing. I?d like to punch him in the face, I?ll tell you.?
Less than two weeks later, Trump repeated his legal-fees promise to those taking a protester out of a rally in Warren, Mich., saying: ?Get him out. Try not to hurt him. If you do, I?ll defend you in court, don?t worry about it.?
Then this...
In Kansas City, he said that violent responses to protesters are ?appropriate,? adding: ?The audience hit back. That?s what we need a little more of.? THAT is inciting violence, by any normal person's measurement
Oh, and, to my original point...?Any guy that can do a body slam, he is my type!? the president told a cheering audience in Missoula. Trump was referring to an incident last year when Rep. Greg Gianforte grabbed a reporter and threw him down during a special-election campaign event. Gianforte apologized at the time and wound up pleading guilty to assault, receiving a sentence of service, but was elected anyway.
So, tRump himself referred to Gianforte's actions as a "Body-slam". Is tRump wrong?
Say what you will about my cite, the words belong to tRump. He said 'em. It's a matter of fact, not conjecture, interpretation or bias.
Yep, he said those things......got it.....it's on video.....got it. Here's the rub, he's been relentlessly attacked from the day he announced he was a candidate and it's been non stop ever since. At minimum 92%+ of news coverage by the lame stream media about Trump is negative and that narrative continues to this day. The left and it's media lap dogs did the same thing to Bush (43) when he was elected. Who on the democratic side has been attacked in this manner by the media for this long?? NONE!!
That said I don't see Trump supporters rioting, destroying property, setting fires, publically harassing and assaulting people, taking over federal buildings and so on. What group needed grief counseling, hot cocoa, petting puppies, and safe spaces before they went on a rampage?? You can't equate Trumps rhetoric and the lefts actual actions which is spurred on by it's own vile rhetoric.0 -
quote:Originally posted by Colonel Plink
quote:Originally posted by Dads3040
Any thoughts on the culpability of senior officials who says stupid crap like 'If they go low, we kick them' or 'You cant be civil to those trying to destroy what you believe in'. Or the POS Democrats who have been encouraging aggressive confrontation of Republicans? Or the leftist marching POS who allow and condone antifa and all the rest of those bedwetting cowardly masked groups?
Any thoughts at all? Or just more leftist deflection and BS?
There's no denying that we're angrier than we ever were. There's enough blame to go 'round on both sides. From the top down. If disagreeing with as many of tRump's Policies as I did Obama's makes me "leftist" then so be it. But there is no longer "Leadership" in this country. The nasty, snide and willful ignorance that has long defined the lower class in America has now been elevated to the highest level of government.
I understand your glee at having your basest instincts validated by the occupants of the White House, but shouldn't we be better than that? Shouldn't you?
This is such BS. Plenty of blame to go around.
You know what this is? The usual nonsense from someone not honest enough to admit they are a liberal.
quote:If disagreeing with as many of tRump's Policies as I did Obama's makes me "leftist" then so be it.
Apparently you were so busy disagreeing with so many of Obama's policies that you didn't have time to come up with a cute little childish name...that you then type in EVERY f'n time you refer to him. Must have been an oversight.
Feel free to delude yourself, but the ruse fails on the sentient.
Scratch a 'middle of the road pantload moderate' and find a lying liberal. Every time.
Res Ipsa Loquitor0 -
quote:?If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun,? Obama said at a Philadelphia fundraiser Friday night. ?Because from what I understand folks in Philly like a good brawl. I?ve seen Eagles fans.? Obama June 2008 0 -
quote:Originally posted by Sam06
They got a suspect now.
It looks like he is a Trumpy supporter.
He has a van covered in political stickers.
Typical Nut Job. He is just a suspect.
[:D] If he's a dyed in the wool democrat, his front is still strong! If he's a republican, I'd suspect that he hired someone with the skills necessary to put all of those stickers on his van. [:D]0 -
quote:Originally posted by Dads3040
Apparently you were so busy disagreeing with so many of Obama's policies that you didn't have time to come up with a cute little childish name...that you then type in EVERY f'n time you refer to him. Must have been an oversight.
Feel free to delude yourself, but the ruse fails on the sentient.
Scratch a 'middle of the road pantload moderate' and find a lying liberal. Every time.
Res Ipsa Loquitor
Ooh. Latin. How smart of you.
I've been disgusted with tRump since I've been aware of him. The moniker isn't something new. And, I notice you haven't even begun to address my question. But I didn't expect you to. It's easier to just hurl insults.
Scratch you and find....nothing...0 -
quote:Originally posted by kimi
quote:Originally posted by Sam06
They got a suspect now.
It looks like he is a Trumpy supporter.
He has a van covered in political stickers.
Typical Nut Job. He is just a suspect.
[:D] If he's a dyed in the wool democrat, his front is still strong! If he's a republican, I'd suspect that he hired someone with the skills necessary to put all of those stickers on his van. [:D]
Kimi
IMO anyone who puts stickers all over their vehicle is a nut job whether he is a Libtard or a "conservative"[;)]
It looks like he has a scooter on the back so he may be disabled too.
Maybe a disabled Vet that votes (R).........That is the kind of meat the press has been praying for.
I can guarantee dickwads like don lemon and cumo have been burning incense and sacrificing small animals to their god for this guy to be just what I described.0 -
quote:Originally posted by Sam06
quote:Originally posted by kimi
quote:Originally posted by Sam06
They got a suspect now.
It looks like he is a Trumpy supporter.
He has a van covered in political stickers.
Typical Nut Job. He is just a suspect.
[:D] If he's a dyed in the wool democrat, his front is still strong! If he's a republican, I'd suspect that he hired someone with the skills necessary to put all of those stickers on his van. [:D]
Kimi
IMO anyone who puts stickers all over their vehicle is a nut job whether he is a Libtard or a "conservative"[;)]
It looks like he has a scooter on the back so he may be disabled too.
Maybe a disabled Vet that votes (R).........That is the kind of meat the press has been praying for.
I can guarantee dickwads like don lemon and cumo have been burning incense and sacrificing small animals to their god for this guy to be just what I described.
All good points, Sam! Hopefully, they will find him to be a 'stooge' as someone else mentioned.0 -
quote:Originally posted by Colonel Plink
quote:Originally posted by Dads3040
Apparently you were so busy disagreeing with so many of Obama's policies that you didn't have time to come up with a cute little childish name...that you then type in EVERY f'n time you refer to him. Must have been an oversight.
Feel free to delude yourself, but the ruse fails on the sentient.
Scratch a 'middle of the road pantload moderate' and find a lying liberal. Every time.
Res Ipsa Loquitor
Ooh. Latin. How smart of you.
I've been disgusted with tRump since I've been aware of him. The moniker isn't something new. And, I notice you haven't even begun to address my question. But I didn't expect you to. It's easier to just hurl insults.
Scratch you and find....nothing...
As with most leftists, you avoid answering questions while demanding others answer yours. Typical.
Your nickname for Obama?0 -
My favorite, not very subtle Democratic Threat, what's next - extorsion? 0 -
I haven't read every post, but here is my 2 cents worth.
CNN is a communist type NWO propaganda machine ..
Democrats have drank the NWO cool aid and abandon our Constitutional Republic.
Trump haters have no clue as to the good he is doing for America, because they watch CNN and can't think for themselves or won't do any of their own research. There has to be some sort of mental illness going on with them.
quote:has any one of these "bombs" exploded ????? if not then the perp is a supremely stupid...OR...this is all just some sick political ploy to blame trump ????????????????????????
No exploded bombs, and I think that is certainly a possibility.0 -
quote:Originally posted by Dads3040
quote:Originally posted by Colonel Plink
quote:Originally posted by Dads3040
Apparently you were so busy disagreeing with so many of Obama's policies that you didn't have time to come up with a cute little childish name...that you then type in EVERY f'n time you refer to him. Must have been an oversight.
Feel free to delude yourself, but the ruse fails on the sentient.
Scratch a 'middle of the road pantload moderate' and find a lying liberal. Every time.
Res Ipsa Loquitor
Ooh. Latin. How smart of you.
I've been disgusted with tRump since I've been aware of him. The moniker isn't something new. And, I notice you haven't even begun to address my question. But I didn't expect you to. It's easier to just hurl insults.
Scratch you and find....nothing...
As with most leftists, you avoid answering questions while demanding others answer yours. Typical.
Your nickname for Obama?
Convention usually requires you to go first. Since I asked first.
But I'll humor you since you weren't raise right. (not your fault, obviously). I called Obama (derisively) "Barry". I know, I know, not my best work. But hey. I voted against him twice so that's gotta be worth something, non?0 -
Took 18 years to catch the uni bomber. They got this guy in record time. Bombs sent to liberals. Trump stickers all over his vehicle. This whole thing was put together quickly. Had to get it done and an arrest made before the elections. Anyone who cant smell a rat with all this. isn't trying very hard. 0 -
Took 18 years to catch the uni bomber. They got this guy in record time. Bombs sent to liberals. Trump stickers all over his vehicle. This whole thing was put together quickly. Had to get it done and an arrest made before the elections. Anyone who cant smell a rat with all this. isn't trying very hard. 0 -
quote:Originally posted by Sam06
They got a suspect now.
It looks like he is a Trumpy supporter.
He has a van covered in political stickers.
Typical Nut Job. He is just a suspect.
If your ride looks like that - your most likely a known nut. I'm afraid crow is on the menu. Then again - I trust NOTHING from the justice league anymore0 -
quote:Originally posted by Colonel Plink
quote:Originally posted by shilowar
I have not heard Trump once encourage violence, certainly nothing approaching the message of Democrat political leaders. Calling CNN fake NEWS in no way advocates violence. Dems and media have been trying to make this stretch that Trumps advocates violence when he has said the opposite. If I am wrong, or have missed a direction to violence by Trump as comparable to obvious calls for violence by Democrats please post it here.
On Feb. 23, 2016, during a campaign rally in Las Vegas, Trump said of a heckler who was being ejected from the building, ?He?s walking out with big high-fives, smiling, laughing. I?d like to punch him in the face, I?ll tell you.?
Less than two weeks later, Trump repeated his legal-fees promise to those taking a protester out of a rally in Warren, Mich., saying: ?Get him out. Try not to hurt him. If you do, I?ll defend you in court, don?t worry about it.?
Then this...
In Kansas City, he said that violent responses to protesters are ?appropriate,? adding: ?The audience hit back. That?s what we need a little more of.? THAT is inciting violence, by any normal person's measurement
Oh, and, to my original point...?Any guy that can do a body slam, he is my type!? the president told a cheering audience in Missoula. Trump was referring to an incident last year when Rep. Greg Gianforte grabbed a reporter and threw him down during a special-election campaign event. Gianforte apologized at the time and wound up pleading guilty to assault, receiving a sentence of service, but was elected anyway.
So, tRump himself referred to Gianforte's actions as a "Body-slam". Is tRump wrong?
Say what you will about my cite, the words belong to tRump. He said 'em. It's a matter of fact, not conjecture, interpretation or bias.
ETA: cite
https://www.macleans.ca/politics/washington/the-ways-that-donald-trump-incites-violence/
Fair enough, I forgot about those events. Can you point to anything he's said since being elected President? That didn't occur nearly three years ago? Democrats were advocating violence just in the past couple weeks.0 -
quote:Originally posted by Colonel Plink
quote:Originally posted by shilowar
I have not heard Trump once encourage violence, certainly nothing approaching the message of Democrat political leaders. Calling CNN fake NEWS in no way advocates violence. Dems and media have been trying to make this stretch that Trumps advocates violence when he has said the opposite. If I am wrong, or have missed a direction to violence by Trump as comparable to obvious calls for violence by Democrats please post it here.
On Feb. 23, 2016, during a campaign rally in Las Vegas, Trump said of a heckler who was being ejected from the building, ?He?s walking out with big high-fives, smiling, laughing. I?d like to punch him in the face, I?ll tell you.?
Less than two weeks later, Trump repeated his legal-fees promise to those taking a protester out of a rally in Warren, Mich., saying: ?Get him out. Try not to hurt him. If you do, I?ll defend you in court, don?t worry about it.?
Then this...
In Kansas City, he said that violent responses to protesters are ?appropriate,? adding: ?The audience hit back. That?s what we need a little more of.? THAT is inciting violence, by any normal person's measurement
Oh, and, to my original point...?Any guy that can do a body slam, he is my type!? the president told a cheering audience in Missoula. Trump was referring to an incident last year when Rep. Greg Gianforte grabbed a reporter and threw him down during a special-election campaign event. Gianforte apologized at the time and wound up pleading guilty to assault, receiving a sentence of service, but was elected anyway.
So, tRump himself referred to Gianforte's actions as a "Body-slam". Is tRump wrong?
Say what you will about my cite, the words belong to tRump. He said 'em. It's a matter of fact, not conjecture, interpretation or bias.
ETA: cite
https://www.macleans.ca/politics/washington/the-ways-that-donald-trump-incites-violence/
What is the purpose of the "tRump" spelling? A pejorative of some sort, I presume?
When I disagreed with President Obama - and it was often and profound, to the extent of considering his statements deliberately misleading, dishonest and destructive - I always referred to him as "President Obama". Not that I'd expect anyone to have a life so boring as to do so, but I'll wager no one can find any instance where I addressed him as anything but.
Writing "tRump" certainly isn't up there with a President suggesting body slams, or lesser elected officials like Representative Waters encouraging crowding and pushing of Republican legislators or the fellow who tried to kill Representative Scalise. But it's of the same realm - similar coinage and trade, so to speak. Nor criticize someone else while (modestly) playing the same game.0 -
The only thing that would have made this better for the Libs is if he would have been white. 0 -
quote:Originally posted by dfletcher
quote:Originally posted by Colonel Plink
quote:Originally posted by shilowar
I have not heard Trump once encourage violence, certainly nothing approaching the message of Democrat political leaders. Calling CNN fake NEWS in no way advocates violence. Dems and media have been trying to make this stretch that Trumps advocates violence when he has said the opposite. If I am wrong, or have missed a direction to violence by Trump as comparable to obvious calls for violence by Democrats please post it here.
On Feb. 23, 2016, during a campaign rally in Las Vegas, Trump said of a heckler who was being ejected from the building, ?He?s walking out with big high-fives, smiling, laughing. I?d like to punch him in the face, I?ll tell you.?
Less than two weeks later, Trump repeated his legal-fees promise to those taking a protester out of a rally in Warren, Mich., saying: ?Get him out. Try not to hurt him. If you do, I?ll defend you in court, don?t worry about it.?
Then this...
In Kansas City, he said that violent responses to protesters are ?appropriate,? adding: ?The audience hit back. That?s what we need a little more of.? THAT is inciting violence, by any normal person's measurement
Oh, and, to my original point...?Any guy that can do a body slam, he is my type!? the president told a cheering audience in Missoula. Trump was referring to an incident last year when Rep. Greg Gianforte grabbed a reporter and threw him down during a special-election campaign event. Gianforte apologized at the time and wound up pleading guilty to assault, receiving a sentence of service, but was elected anyway.
So, tRump himself referred to Gianforte's actions as a "Body-slam". Is tRump wrong?
Say what you will about my cite, the words belong to tRump. He said 'em. It's a matter of fact, not conjecture, interpretation or bias.
ETA: cite
https://www.macleans.ca/politics/washington/the-ways-that-donald-trump-incites-violence/
What is the purpose of the "tRump" spelling? A pejorative of some sort, I presume?
When I disagreed with President Obama - and it was often and profound, to the extent of considering his statements deliberately misleading, dishonest and destructive - I always referred to him as "President Obama". Not that I'd expect anyone to have a life so boring as to do so, but I'll wager no one can find any instance where I addressed him as anything but.
Writing "tRump" certainly isn't up there with a President suggesting body slams, or lesser elected officials like Representative Waters encouraging crowding and pushing of Republican legislators or the fellow who tried to kill Representative Scalise. But it's of the same realm - similar coinage and trade, so to speak. Nor criticize someone else while (modestly) playing the same game.
Obama was never president. He was a pretender. He did not qualify under the constitution and the swamp did nothing. Traitor McCain could have stopped him in his tracks. Larry Clayman tried, but the courts said he (Clayman) did not have standing. McCain did, and did nothing. [:(!][:(!][:(!][:(!]0 -
quote:Originally posted by Colonel Plink
quote:Originally posted by mag00...
One is an offensive position and the other is a defensive position. As a person who frequents a firearms forum, surely you understand the difference.
I wouldn't say "frequent" any more. I just come here to get a little insight into the tRumpian mind.
And please forgive me for not adding my cite to my original post. I've fixed that. Now, maybe you can do the same. It'll help me understand your viewpoint.
You wouldn't say that that because you don't believe in responding truthfully, that is your type, and that is why the liberal left is instigating and starting each incident. Then when someone stands up to the bully, "Whoa is Me".
You're smart enough, you know what I'm talking about. As far as quoting what I am responding to, it is all there. Sorry to confuse you. [;)]0 -
quote:Originally posted by mag00
quote:Originally posted by Colonel Plink
quote:Originally posted by mag00...
One is an offensive position and the other is a defensive position. As a person who frequents a firearms forum, surely you understand the difference.
I wouldn't say "frequent" any more. I just come here to get a little insight into the tRumpian mind.
And please forgive me for not adding my cite to my original post. I've fixed that. Now, maybe you can do the same. It'll help me understand your viewpoint.
You wouldn't say that that because you don't believe in responding truthfully, that is your type, and that is why the liberal left is instigating and starting each incident. Then when someone stands up to the bully, "Whoa is Me".
You're smart enough, you know what I'm talking about. As far as quoting what I am responding to, it is all there. Sorry to confuse you. [;)]
That would be 'woe is me.'0
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Comments
84 comments