Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

my take on "casino royal"

1911a1-fan
first it was a very good movie, good plot, acting, and enough action to satisfy anyone, but however, the character of bond was a bit disappointing, not the guy who played him, he did a fine job, but for the first time James bond lost his cool more than once, he was not James bond

DON'T READ ANY FURTHER IF YOU HAVN'T SEEN IT

1. bond would have never left the only pretty woman in the movie without knocking off a piece, i am referring to the Hispanic hottie, not the bond girl

250px-Millicevic.jpg

2. when asked if he wanted his martini shaken or stirred, he said quote: i don't care, very angry, bond would always be cool enough to take the time to enjoy a martini

3. when being tortured, although it was funny as hell bond would have never acted that way

4. my biggest disappointment was the "bond girl", she was a beach, or shall i say CU#T, and not attractive to boot


normal_Eva_Green_Chi1705.jpg


bond never lost his cool under any pressure, and never missed a piece
0

Comments

15 comments

Date Votes
  • dcon12
    quote:Originally posted by 1911a1fan
    bond never lost his cool under any pressure, and never missed a piece


    And I have lived my life the same way. Don
    0
  • tsavo303
    That movie rocks, agree with the girls, but like the more real, brutal and consistant with the book Bond!
    0
  • p3skyking
    So you don't think Jim ought to lose his cool?

    You should have seen him once after he came from a mission where I had loaded his PPK with blanks as a gag.

    [:p][:o)]

    I, for one, am glad the childish Bond is gone. The new realism makes good movie fare.
    0
  • mrseatle
    The intro foot-chase scene showed promise...
    0
  • bluez06
    I thought the movie was great, including Bond losing his cool. You've got to remember, the movie takes place when Bond is a brand new agent...he becomes 007 at the beginning of the movie. In that sense, he's still a little brash and headstrong...he's not supposed to be at the Sean Connery in Goldfinger stage yet.
    0
  • elLOCOmutha
    I just saw the movie and thought it was really a great start to the real Bond portrayed Ian Flemings books. Basicly Bond is an assasin...cold blooded killer (in flemings books). I can't wait for the next 007.
    0
  • Colt Super
    "real" Bond???

    D.
    0
  • elLOCOmutha
    quote:Originally posted by Doug Wilson
    "real" Bond???

    D.
    Yes, the Bond fleming created in his books. Casino Royale portrayed bond the way he was meant to be portrayed. I know it is a work of fiction "real" was a bad choice of words I guess if you like nit picking about those things. Most of the 007 movies are far from flemings original character of James Bond in the books. The books are far better than any of the movies, which in most cases is the way it turns out.
    0
  • alledan
    But where was the Hi-tech gadgets and the guy who made them?
    0
  • elLOCOmutha
    quote:Originally posted by alledan
    But where was the Hi-tech gadgets and the guy who made them?
    Dead
    0
  • alledan
    quote:Originally posted by elLOCOmutha
    quote:Originally posted by alledan
    But where was the Hi-tech gadgets and the guy who made them?
    Dead


    Well that's a good reason[:0] But i thought this movie would be along the same lines as all the others[:(]
    0
  • spurgemastur
    If I wanted to watch 45 minutes of high-stakes poker I'd have turned on whichever ESPN channel televises the World Series.

    I liked Bond and the fact that the movie didn't rely too heavily on techno-gadgets but what kind of plot was that?
    0
  • goldeneagle76
    Have not watched a Bond movie since Roger Moore! I'm only 30 but the newer Bonds just don't do anything for me.
    0
  • ljwrench
    If the movie is about Bond in the beginning of his career wouldn't everything be old (old cars, weapons, aircraft, ect)? Shouldn't it have taken place in the late 50's or early 60's? Just wondering. I haven't seen it yet so I guess I need to rent it.
    0
  • bluez06
    quote:Originally posted by ljwrench
    If the movie is about Bond in the beginning of his career wouldn't everything be old (old cars, weapons, aircraft, ect)? Shouldn't it have taken place in the late 50's or early 60's? Just wondering. I haven't seen it yet so I guess I need to rent it.

    Think of it as starting the whole series over. If you wanted to get really picky about the era, all the Bonds in the last 20 years or so would be senior citizens.
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity

Didn’t find what you’re looking for?