Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

Engineers - insights as to why

Comments

20 comments

  • youngsparkey
    Love it.. being an electrician I see that sometimes Engineers are A bit different..[:D[^]
    0
  • wtroper
    Engineer One --- Aggie ?????????????????? [:D][:D]
    0
  • Blade Slinger
    MAN! great post,I have worked with all the above mentioned[:0]
    0
  • stankemp
    Yup.
    We is just like that.
    Even engineers realize they have their own stream of consciousness.javascript:insertsmilie('[:D]')
    Big Smile [:D]
    0
  • kristov
    I know for a fact that I went to USC with the two guys in the first example!

    If it won't add up it is mathematics
    If it stinks it is chemistry
    If it wiggles it is biology
    If it just won't work it is physics
    If it falls apart before your eyes; that means it is engineering!
    0
  • Slow_Hand
    [:D][:D][:D]

    Very good! Funny and yet there's a germ of truth in each.
    0
  • KSUmarksman
    quote:Originally posted by kristov
    I know for a fact that I went to USC with the two guys in the first example!

    If it won't add up it is mathematics
    If it stinks it is chemistry
    If it wiggles it is biology
    If it just won't work it is physics
    If it falls apart before your eyes; that means it is engineering!


    LOL!
    that sounds about right [:D]
    0
  • Old-Colts
    Okay, I agree that we engineers can, at times, appear a little unusual. So, just to prove that we are normal everyday ordinary people just like the rest of the folks here on this forum I've included my favorite Chocolate Chip Cookie recipe. Please feel free to make a copy for your wife, life partner, significant other, etc. and ask them to make a batch for you. Mmmm, Mmmm, Good!!

    Ingredients:

    1) 532.35 cm3 gluten
    2) 4.9 cm3 NaHCO3
    3) 4.9 cm3 refined halite
    4) 236.6 cm3 partially hydrogenated tallow triglyceride
    5) 177.45 cm3 crystalline C12H22O11
    6) 177.45 cm3 unrefined C12H22O11
    7) 4.9 cm3 methyl ether of protocatechuic aldehyde
    8) Two calcium carbonate-encapsulated avian albumen-coated protein
    9) 473.2 cm3 theobroma cacao
    10) 236.6 cm3 de-encapsulated legume meats (sieve size #10)

    To a 2-L jacketed round reactor vessel (reactor #1) with an overall heat transfer coefficient of about 100 Btu/F-ft2-hr, add ingredients one, two and three with constant agitation. In a second 2L reactor vessel with a radial flow impeller operating at 100 rpm, add ingredients four, five, six, and seven until the mixture is homogenous.

    To reactor #2, add ingredient eight, followed by three equal volumes of the homogenous mixture in reactor #1. Additionally, add ingredient nine and ten slowly, with constant agitation. Care must be taken at this point in the reaction to control any temperature rise that may be the result of an exothermic reaction.

    Using a screw extrude attached to a #4 nodulizer, place the mixture piece-meal on a 316SS sheet (300 x 600 mm). Heat in a 460K oven for a period of time that is in agreement with Frank & Johnston's first order rate expression (see JACOS, 21, 55), or until golden brown. Once the reaction is complete, place the sheet on a 25C heat-transfer table, allowing the product to come to equilibrium.

    By reading, not necessarily comprehending, this post you agree not to hold me liable for any injuries sustained from anyone you ask to whip you up a batch of these tasty morsels.
    0
  • kristov
    Heating to 460 Kelvin is classic engineer jargon (that is about 368F for the non geeks out there). I suggest that the cookies be quenched after leaving the oven in a water based fatty emulssion, which also contains calcuim, glucose and glactose. Laymen call this cows milk!
    What was your engineering field Old-Colt? I began as petroleum engineer, got laid off from Union Oil in the early 80's and made a switch to structural engineering. Now a days I spend all of my time working on contracts and attending meetings [V].
    0
  • dheffley
    Are they not all true?[}:)]
    0
  • Old-Colts
    kristov, I was an Electrical Engineer in Defense Electronics for 30 years. I did hardware as well as Software/Firmware design. Retired last year and moved back to Texas. I'm now designing/developing bass catching strategies.
    0
  • spryor
    quote:Originally posted by Old-Colts


    Ingredients:

    1) 532.35 cm3 gluten
    2) 4.9 cm3 NaHCO3
    3) 4.9 cm3 refined halite
    4) 236.6 cm3 partially hydrogenated tallow triglyceride
    5) 177.45 cm3 crystalline C12H22O11
    6) 177.45 cm3 unrefined C12H22O11
    7) 4.9 cm3 methyl ether of protocatechuic aldehyde
    8) Two calcium carbonate-encapsulated avian albumen-coated protein
    9) 473.2 cm3 theobroma cacao
    10) 236.6 cm3 de-encapsulated legume meats (sieve size #10)

    To a 2-L jacketed round reactor vessel (reactor #1) with an overall heat transfer coefficient of about 100 Btu/F-ft2-hr, add ingredients one, two and three with constant agitation. In a second 2L reactor vessel with a radial flow impeller operating at 100 rpm, add ingredients four, five, six, and seven until the mixture is homogenous.

    To reactor #2, add ingredient eight, followed by three equal volumes of the homogenous mixture in reactor #1. Additionally, add ingredient nine and ten slowly, with constant agitation. Care must be taken at this point in the reaction to control any temperature rise that may be the result of an exothermic reaction.


    Jerky..?[;)]
    0
  • iwannausername
    Don't forget the software engineers, or just programmers in general :)
    0
  • ElMuertoMonkey
    [:D][:D][:D]
    0
  • mond
    It can get like that too!! [:D][:D]lmao
    0
  • Tailgunner1954
    quote:Originally posted by kristov
    Heating to 460 Kelvin is classic engineer jargon (that is about 368F for the non geeks out there).


    Why is my memory telling me that 0^K = -460^F (-273^C)????? So "heating" to 460 K would require that I bake the cookies in my freezer, or is this another case of engineering at it's finest?

    Not a engineer, just a knuckle dragging technician that's worked with/on equipment that operates at temps ranging from 15^K to 1200^C


    Edit to add ^'s
    0
  • Old-Colts
    Hi Tailgunner1954, us old retired engineers can't always trust our memories, so I broke out the slide rule to verify the calculation. If I remember correctly, and I certainly can be wrong, the Kelvin scale is measured in degrees Celsius from absolute zero (-273.15 degrees Celsius). Therefore, by converting Kelvin to Fahrenheit using the formula ((460K-273.15C)*(9/5C))+32=368.33F. Now, I could be wrong since my memory has somewhat faded and my slide rule is a little warped.[:D]

    Yikes! I may have proven greeker375's original point![:D][:D][:D]
    0
  • Tailgunner1954
    Per Machinery's handbook # 27 pp 2583:
    To convert Kelvin to Fahrenheit tF = 1.8tK-459.67
    To convert Fahrenheit to Kelvin tK = (tF+459.67)/1.8
    Delta 1K = delta 1C = Delta 1.8F
    32^F = 0^C = 273^K

    Looks more like my "knuckle dragger" mind got the signage crossed up.
    0
  • Colt Super
    This thread was a very pleasant reminder of my Father, an Industrial Engineer, who passed away in 1966.

    He would fit the descriptions perfectly.

    He also would have agreed with them.

    Thanks, a lot, greeker.

    Doug
    0
  • Old-Colts
    Hi again Tailgunner1954. Thanks for looking up the conversion formula, I thought for a while that what I have left for a brain was starting to atrophy, too much fishing and not enough thinking.[:D]

    So, once again I took out my old Dietzgen Maniphase Multiplex Decimal Trig Type Log Log Slide Rule [:0] and I'm glad to see the conversion you found comes up with my original number:[:)]

    tF=1.8tK-459.67
    tF=(1.8*460K)-459.67
    tF=828-459.67
    tF=368.33

    My retired brain is starting to hurt so I'm going to stop thinking for a while.[xx(]
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity

Didn’t find what you’re looking for?