Montana proposes to exempt in-state guns
Montana proposes to exempt in-state guns
Anti-federal bills move forward in House
Feb. 1, 2007
HELENA -- Lawmakers in the Montana House of Representatives collectively thumbed their noses at the federal government Monday by approving two bills exempting guns from federal regulations and driver's licenses from national standardization requirements.
The bills by Reps. Diane Rice, R-Harrison, and Roger Koopman, R-Bozeman, do different things but are driven by the same concern: the erosion of personal liberties by the federal government.
Koopman said Monday his gun bill, House Bill 366, would inspire a home-grown industry of gun-makers who produce firearms to be sold in Montana. It also sends a message reaffirming states' rights. "In that regard, this bill really has positive consequences, I believe, beyond the firearms industry itself," he said.
NATIONAL STANDARDS FOR DRIVERS LICENSES
Rice is sponsoring HB 304, which would prevent the state from cooperating with the federal government in establishing nationwide standards for noncommercial driver's licenses.
Federal standards, she said, amount to a national ID card. Critics fear that such standards will lead to the government tracking its citizens.
There was virtually no debate about the bill before lawmakers voted 94-6 to pass it, with a third and final vote expected today.
It also makes it illegal to issue driver's licenses to illegal aliens, which currently isn't prohibited under state law.
FEDERAL GUN CONTROL LAWS
Koopman's HB 366 would exempt guns made in Montana from federal regulation under the commerce clause of the U.S. Constitution, as long as the guns remain inside the state.
Rep. Tim Dowell, D-Kalispell, criticized it as aiding terrorism. He noted that law enforcement officers used gun regulations to link the Washington D.C.-area sniper shootings.
Terrorists "can come to Montana, they can buy one of these weapons, go on a reign of terror, and there would be no way to track them down," he said.
He also questioned the logic of the state exempting itself from federal law.
"That's pretty cool, maybe we should say we aren't subject to the income tax," he said.
Dowell's complaints were dismissed as "crazy emotionalism" by Rep. Ed Butcher, R-Winifred. In the end, 73 lawmakers voted to move the bill forward, and afterward there was scattered applause on the House floor.
A third and final vote is expect today. If both bills pass their third vote, then they will move on to the Senate.
A BILL FOR AN ACT ENTITLED: "AN ACT EXEMPTING FROM REGULATION UNDER THE COMMERCE CLAUSE OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES A FIREARM, A FIREARM ACCESSORY, OR AMMUNITION MANUFACTURED AND RETAINED IN MONTANA."
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MONTANA:
NEW SECTION. Section 1. Short title. [Sections 1 through 6] may be cited as the "Montana Firearms Freedom Act".
NEW SECTION. Section 2. Legislative declarations of authority. The legislature declares that the authority for [sections 1 through 6] is the following:
(1) The 10th amendment to the United States constitution guarantees to the states and their people all powers not granted to the federal government elsewhere in the constitution and reserves to the state and people of Montana certain powers as they were understood at the time that Montana was admitted to statehood in 1889. The guarantee of those powers is a matter of contract between the state and people of Montana and the United States as of the time that the compact with the United States was agreed upon and adopted by Montana and the United States in 1889.
(2) The ninth amendment to the United States constitution guarantees to the people rights not granted in the constitution and reserves to the people of Montana certain rights as they were understood at the time that Montana was admitted to statehood in 1889. The guarantee of those rights is a matter of contract between the state and people of Montana and the United States as of the time that the compact with the United States was agreed upon and adopted by Montana and the United States in 1889.
(3) The regulation of intrastate commerce is vested in the states under the 9th and 10th amendments to the United States constitution, particularly if not expressly preempted by federal law. Congress has not expressly preempted state regulation of intrastate commerce pertaining to the manufacture on an intrastate basis of firearms, firearms accessories, and ammunition.
(4) The second amendment to the United States constitution reserves to the people the right to keep and bear arms as that right was understood at the time that Montana was admitted to statehood in 1889, and the guarantee of the right is a matter of contract between the state and people of Montana and the United States as of the time that the compact with the United States was agreed upon and adopted by Montana and the United States in 1889.
(5) Article II, section 12, of the Montana constitution clearly secures to Montana citizens, and prohibits government interference with, the right of individual Montana citizens to keep and bear arms. This constitutional protection is unchanged from the 1889 Montana constitution, which was approved by congress and the people of Montana, and the right exists as it was understood at the time that the compact with the United States was agreed upon and adopted by Montana and the United States in 1889.
NEW SECTION. Section 3. Definitions. As used in [sections 1 through 6], the following definitions apply:
(1) "Borders of Montana" means the boundaries of Montana described in Article I, section 1, of the 1889 Montana constitution.
(2) "Firearms accessories" means items that are used in conjunction with or mounted upon a firearm but are not essential to the basic function of a firearm, including but not limited to telescopic or laser sights, magazines, flash or sound suppressors, folding or aftermarket stocks and grips, speedloaders, ammunition carriers, and lights for target illumination.
(3) "Generic and insignificant parts" includes but is not limited to springs, screws, nuts, and pins.
(4) "Manufactured" means creating a firearm, a firearm accessory, or ammunition from basic materials for functional usefulness, including but not limited to forging, casting, machining, or other processes for working materials.
NEW SECTION. Section 4. Prohibition. A personal firearm, a firearm accessory, or ammunition that is manufactured commercially or privately in Montana and that remains within the borders of Montana is not subject to federal law or federal regulation, including registration, under the authority of congress to regulate interstate commerce. It is declared by the legislature that those items have not traveled in interstate commerce. This section applies to a firearm, a firearm accessory, or ammunition that is manufactured in Montana from basic materials and that can be manufactured without the inclusion of any significant parts imported from another state. Generic and insignificant parts that have other manufacturing or consumer product applications are not firearms, firearms accessories, or ammunition, and their importation into Montana and incorporation into a firearm, a firearm accessory, or ammunition manufactured in Montana does not subject the firearm, firearm accessory, or ammunition to federal regulation. It is declared by the legislature that basic materials, such as unmachined steel and unshaped wood, are not firearms, firearms accessories, or ammunition and are not subject to congressional authority to regulate firearms, firearms accessories, and ammunition under interstate commerce as if they were actually firearms, firearms accessories, or ammunition. The authority of congress to regulate interstate commerce in basic materials does not include authority to regulate firearms, firearms accessories, and ammunition made in Montana from those materials. Firearms accessories that are imported into Montana from another state and that are subject to federal regulation as being in interstate commerce do not subject a firearm to federal regulation under interstate commerce because they are attached to or used in conjunction with a firearm in Montana.
NEW SECTION. Section 5. Exceptions. [Section 4] does not apply to:
(1) a firearm that cannot be carried and used by one person;
(2) a firearm that has a bore diameter greater than 1 1/2 inches and that uses smokeless powder, not black powder, as a propellant;
(3) ammunition with a projectile that explodes using an explosion of chemical energy after the projectile leaves the firearm; or
(4) a firearm that discharges two or more projectiles with one activation of the trigger or other firing device.
NEW SECTION. Section 6. Marking of firearms. A firearm manufactured or sold in Montana under [sections 1 through 6] must have the words "Made in Montana" clearly stamped on a central metallic part, such as the receiver or frame.
NEW SECTION. Section 7. Codification instruction. [Sections 1 through 6] are intended to be codified as an integral part of Title 30, and the provisions of Title 30 apply to [sections 1 through 6].
http://www.bozemandailychronicle.co...5/news/anti.txt
Anti-federal bills move forward in House
Feb. 1, 2007
HELENA -- Lawmakers in the Montana House of Representatives collectively thumbed their noses at the federal government Monday by approving two bills exempting guns from federal regulations and driver's licenses from national standardization requirements.
The bills by Reps. Diane Rice, R-Harrison, and Roger Koopman, R-Bozeman, do different things but are driven by the same concern: the erosion of personal liberties by the federal government.
Koopman said Monday his gun bill, House Bill 366, would inspire a home-grown industry of gun-makers who produce firearms to be sold in Montana. It also sends a message reaffirming states' rights. "In that regard, this bill really has positive consequences, I believe, beyond the firearms industry itself," he said.
NATIONAL STANDARDS FOR DRIVERS LICENSES
Rice is sponsoring HB 304, which would prevent the state from cooperating with the federal government in establishing nationwide standards for noncommercial driver's licenses.
Federal standards, she said, amount to a national ID card. Critics fear that such standards will lead to the government tracking its citizens.
There was virtually no debate about the bill before lawmakers voted 94-6 to pass it, with a third and final vote expected today.
It also makes it illegal to issue driver's licenses to illegal aliens, which currently isn't prohibited under state law.
FEDERAL GUN CONTROL LAWS
Koopman's HB 366 would exempt guns made in Montana from federal regulation under the commerce clause of the U.S. Constitution, as long as the guns remain inside the state.
Rep. Tim Dowell, D-Kalispell, criticized it as aiding terrorism. He noted that law enforcement officers used gun regulations to link the Washington D.C.-area sniper shootings.
Terrorists "can come to Montana, they can buy one of these weapons, go on a reign of terror, and there would be no way to track them down," he said.
He also questioned the logic of the state exempting itself from federal law.
"That's pretty cool, maybe we should say we aren't subject to the income tax," he said.
Dowell's complaints were dismissed as "crazy emotionalism" by Rep. Ed Butcher, R-Winifred. In the end, 73 lawmakers voted to move the bill forward, and afterward there was scattered applause on the House floor.
A third and final vote is expect today. If both bills pass their third vote, then they will move on to the Senate.
A BILL FOR AN ACT ENTITLED: "AN ACT EXEMPTING FROM REGULATION UNDER THE COMMERCE CLAUSE OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES A FIREARM, A FIREARM ACCESSORY, OR AMMUNITION MANUFACTURED AND RETAINED IN MONTANA."
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MONTANA:
NEW SECTION. Section 1. Short title. [Sections 1 through 6] may be cited as the "Montana Firearms Freedom Act".
NEW SECTION. Section 2. Legislative declarations of authority. The legislature declares that the authority for [sections 1 through 6] is the following:
(1) The 10th amendment to the United States constitution guarantees to the states and their people all powers not granted to the federal government elsewhere in the constitution and reserves to the state and people of Montana certain powers as they were understood at the time that Montana was admitted to statehood in 1889. The guarantee of those powers is a matter of contract between the state and people of Montana and the United States as of the time that the compact with the United States was agreed upon and adopted by Montana and the United States in 1889.
(2) The ninth amendment to the United States constitution guarantees to the people rights not granted in the constitution and reserves to the people of Montana certain rights as they were understood at the time that Montana was admitted to statehood in 1889. The guarantee of those rights is a matter of contract between the state and people of Montana and the United States as of the time that the compact with the United States was agreed upon and adopted by Montana and the United States in 1889.
(3) The regulation of intrastate commerce is vested in the states under the 9th and 10th amendments to the United States constitution, particularly if not expressly preempted by federal law. Congress has not expressly preempted state regulation of intrastate commerce pertaining to the manufacture on an intrastate basis of firearms, firearms accessories, and ammunition.
(4) The second amendment to the United States constitution reserves to the people the right to keep and bear arms as that right was understood at the time that Montana was admitted to statehood in 1889, and the guarantee of the right is a matter of contract between the state and people of Montana and the United States as of the time that the compact with the United States was agreed upon and adopted by Montana and the United States in 1889.
(5) Article II, section 12, of the Montana constitution clearly secures to Montana citizens, and prohibits government interference with, the right of individual Montana citizens to keep and bear arms. This constitutional protection is unchanged from the 1889 Montana constitution, which was approved by congress and the people of Montana, and the right exists as it was understood at the time that the compact with the United States was agreed upon and adopted by Montana and the United States in 1889.
NEW SECTION. Section 3. Definitions. As used in [sections 1 through 6], the following definitions apply:
(1) "Borders of Montana" means the boundaries of Montana described in Article I, section 1, of the 1889 Montana constitution.
(2) "Firearms accessories" means items that are used in conjunction with or mounted upon a firearm but are not essential to the basic function of a firearm, including but not limited to telescopic or laser sights, magazines, flash or sound suppressors, folding or aftermarket stocks and grips, speedloaders, ammunition carriers, and lights for target illumination.
(3) "Generic and insignificant parts" includes but is not limited to springs, screws, nuts, and pins.
(4) "Manufactured" means creating a firearm, a firearm accessory, or ammunition from basic materials for functional usefulness, including but not limited to forging, casting, machining, or other processes for working materials.
NEW SECTION. Section 4. Prohibition. A personal firearm, a firearm accessory, or ammunition that is manufactured commercially or privately in Montana and that remains within the borders of Montana is not subject to federal law or federal regulation, including registration, under the authority of congress to regulate interstate commerce. It is declared by the legislature that those items have not traveled in interstate commerce. This section applies to a firearm, a firearm accessory, or ammunition that is manufactured in Montana from basic materials and that can be manufactured without the inclusion of any significant parts imported from another state. Generic and insignificant parts that have other manufacturing or consumer product applications are not firearms, firearms accessories, or ammunition, and their importation into Montana and incorporation into a firearm, a firearm accessory, or ammunition manufactured in Montana does not subject the firearm, firearm accessory, or ammunition to federal regulation. It is declared by the legislature that basic materials, such as unmachined steel and unshaped wood, are not firearms, firearms accessories, or ammunition and are not subject to congressional authority to regulate firearms, firearms accessories, and ammunition under interstate commerce as if they were actually firearms, firearms accessories, or ammunition. The authority of congress to regulate interstate commerce in basic materials does not include authority to regulate firearms, firearms accessories, and ammunition made in Montana from those materials. Firearms accessories that are imported into Montana from another state and that are subject to federal regulation as being in interstate commerce do not subject a firearm to federal regulation under interstate commerce because they are attached to or used in conjunction with a firearm in Montana.
NEW SECTION. Section 5. Exceptions. [Section 4] does not apply to:
(1) a firearm that cannot be carried and used by one person;
(2) a firearm that has a bore diameter greater than 1 1/2 inches and that uses smokeless powder, not black powder, as a propellant;
(3) ammunition with a projectile that explodes using an explosion of chemical energy after the projectile leaves the firearm; or
(4) a firearm that discharges two or more projectiles with one activation of the trigger or other firing device.
NEW SECTION. Section 6. Marking of firearms. A firearm manufactured or sold in Montana under [sections 1 through 6] must have the words "Made in Montana" clearly stamped on a central metallic part, such as the receiver or frame.
NEW SECTION. Section 7. Codification instruction. [Sections 1 through 6] are intended to be codified as an integral part of Title 30, and the provisions of Title 30 apply to [sections 1 through 6].
http://www.bozemandailychronicle.co...5/news/anti.txt
0
-
Go Montana! 0 -
Great idea, it would be nice if Missouri followed suit. The "enemy" here in Saint Louis and in Kansas City would shoot this down. 0 -
RIGHT ON MONTANA !!!!! Finally a state is showing some balls. 0 -
More states need to do this.
Despite my differing views on who "won" the civil war, and who started the civil war, I am 100% behind states rights.0 -
the only thing that concerns me is the part about giving drivers licenses to illegal aliens. did i read that correctly ? 0 -
I'M MOVEING TO MONTANA!! GOOO SHOW THE FEDS!
and no he said it would then be ILLEGAL to give licenses to illegal immigrants which as of right now is not a law.0 -
Good thing to see. I'm surprised with Texas history and the overall love of guns here they haven't decided to do the same. 0 -
quote:Originally posted by RunForest
the only thing that concerns me is the part about giving drivers licenses to illegal aliens. did i read that correctly ?
No
It also makes it illegal to issue driver's licenses to illegal aliens, which currently isn't prohibited under state law.0 -
quote:Originally posted by acdodd
quote:Originally posted by RunForest
the only thing that concerns me is the part about giving drivers licenses to illegal aliens. did i read that correctly ?
No
It also makes it illegal to issue driver's licenses to illegal aliens, which currently isn't prohibited under state law.
in that case i support them 100%0 -
That's pretty cool, maybe we should say we aren't subject to the income tax," he said.
I love it when an idiot get's it right.Especially when they don't have a clue[8D].GO MT0 -
[:D][:D][:D] 0 -
I have to imagine the feds are going to counter this somehow...
Montana can't evict federal law enforcement officers from the state, can they? These guns will still be be subject to federal firearms laws.
CA has "legal" medical pot.....but the feds have raided places that sell it0 -
quote:Originally posted by Dak To 68
Great idea, it would be nice if Missouri followed suit. The "enemy" here in Saint Louis and in Kansas City would shoot this down.
Yep, wish MO. had the balls MT does.0 -
I hope PA will follow suit as well... thats if they haven't already made their decision, haven't heard anything about it.
But PA is a pretty gun friendly state, we shall have to see.0 -
quote:Originally posted by HighVolumeOfFire
Montana can't evict federal law enforcement officers from the state, can they? These guns will still be be subject to federal firearms laws.
I seem to remember about 10 years, a western state Sheriff threw all federal agents out of his county. IIRC, he could do it because an elected sheriff is the CLEO (Chief Law Enforcement Officer) of the county, so constitutionally he trumps all other law enforcement, including feds. Anyone remember the details?0 -
I might have to move a few miles down the road...across the state line. WTG MT!!! 0 -
If the hippies in San Fran can say yes to pot, I don't see why the folks in Montana can say the same to firearms. 0 -
Maybe I should move to montana. [^] 0 -
If only this type action would take hold in more states, the Fed would be put back into its proper place. Amen Montana! 0 -
Section 5(4) would seem to exclude shotguns since they fire multiple projectiles with one pull of the trigger (firing device)
Other than that, way cool. I've been saying for ages that the 10th amendment has been overlooked in the battle for preserving the 2nd.0 -
quote:Originally posted by Henry0Reilly
Section 5(4) would seem to exclude shotguns since they fire multiple projectiles with one pull of the trigger (firing device)
Other than that, way cool. I've been saying for ages that the 10th amendment has been overlooked in the battle for preserving the 2nd.
maybe they should re-state it as a weapon that fires off more than one cartridge at a time.0 -
*PACKS HIS BAGS FOR MONTANA* 0 -
Way to go Montana! I sure hope this sets the precedence for more states to follow. 0 -
G[:p]TTA L[^]VE IT! ....................... from Great Falls, MT. 0 -
I would join the rebels, Montana is entirely within its constitutional rights to do this, assuming the feds tried to take issue with it.
FIring on the feds first, is a diff story in my opinion, I am inherently biased towards the side that does not fire the first shots, but rather, under fire, decides to defend itself (the iraw war being a grey area where I tend to think we cant consider them to be sthe same group that "fired the first shots", I remain unconvicned the Iraqi govet had anything to do with 9-11, and Have seen no hard evidence but only jinogisitic rumor to the contrary)
If the feds tried to take command through martial practices against montanta, I would back montana, no If ands or Buts. My loyalty lies in the reason for fighting, not the organization doing the fighting.0 -
Ahh ... for a minute I thought full-auto was included ...
quote:(4) a firearm that discharges two or more projectiles with one activation of the trigger or other firing device.0 -
quote:Originally posted by HighVolumeOfFire
I have to imagine the feds are going to counter this somehow...
Montana can't evict federal law enforcement officers from the state, can they? These guns will still be be subject to federal firearms laws.
CA has "legal" medical pot.....but the feds have raided places that sell it
I'm sure they will. Remember the last time a State or group of States tried to buck the system in the name of State's rights they got invaded.0 -
One warning on the drivers license. I believe it is the feds that require the states to honor each others drivers licenses. If Montana chooses not to participate in a standardized DL it is possible their DL could be invalid outside Montana.
A for firearms, while I see some merit, I could forsee some residents migrating out of the state getting in some pretty serious trouble with the feds. I also question the viability of a home grown gun making businesses because of the limited market.Due to low volume guns would likely be "hand made" and expensive.0 -
quote:Originally posted by ElMuertoMonkey
If the hippies in San Fran can say yes to pot, I don't see why the folks in Montana can say the same to firearms.
San Fran said yes to pot, and the feds said "no." Same with Oregon and assisted suicide. This current Administration seems to care nothing for state's rights or the will of the people, it will be no different in Montana.0 -
Who makes guns in Montana?
It only applies to guns made and kept in the state. Paper tiger?0
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Comments
36 comments