Suddenly, Celebrity babes arn't so hot anymore....

March 20, 2007 06:34

Stars with/without their makeup

http://www.ebaumsworld.com/celeb.html

http://seehere.blogspot.com/2006/08/celebrities-without-makeup.html

Comments

20 comments

p3skyking

March 20, 2007 06:41
Wow, Goldie looks horrible.[xx(]
0
sig232

March 20, 2007 06:49
Its kind of sad, that we all age sooner or later! It is a shock to see someone in a movie and have an image of that person in your minds eye and then years later see that person in the flesh without makeup.[:0]
0
bobski

March 20, 2007 07:05
"beauty is vain, and charm is deceitful, but a woman that fears the LORD shall be praised."

bible, old testament[;)]
0
chollagardens

March 20, 2007 07:16
Some of the photos show how good they look after plastic surgery but before make up.[:0][B)]
0
p3skyking

March 20, 2007 10:13
quote:Originally posted by bobski
"beauty is vain, and charm is deceitful, but a woman that fears the LORD shall be praised."

bible, old testament[;)]

Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned.

Common sense[:p]
0
spanielsells

March 20, 2007 10:37
Being a little fair here...

Some of these "before" pictures are literally a decade old. People age.

Second of all, these "before" pictures are all staged. The "after" pictures are the few opportunities the paparrazi get and they wouldn't be flattering no matter how they were taken.

Third of all, some of these "after" pictures aren't bad. Halle Barry, Julia Roberts, and Charlize Theron aren't what I would classify as ugly in the pictures, they just look more average than not.
0
mateomasfeo

March 20, 2007 11:08
quote:Originally posted by p3skyking
Wow, Goldie looks horrible.[xx(]

Hell, she's about 100 ain't she?
0
JackBwr

March 20, 2007 14:58
Not to mention the lighting in the studio using a camera worth ten grand compared to natural day light in every before picture, most likely using a more average camera. Really not surprising.
0
Spider7115

March 20, 2007 16:49
quote:Originally posted by mateomasfeo
quote:Originally posted by p3skyking
Wow, Goldie looks horrible.[xx(]

Hell, she's about 100 ain't she?

Looks like someone finally socked it to her [xx(]
0
Ray Boone

March 20, 2007 22:17
That's why I decline to attend High School reunions. I recall a few of the girls that were real knockouts, and I prefer to have those memories remain intact.
0
jabronij3

March 20, 2007 23:37
quote:Originally posted by bobski
"beauty is vain, and charm is deceitful, but a woman that fears the LORD shall be praised."

bible, old testament[;)]
[:D]
0
320090T

March 21, 2007 03:25
I don't care! Diaz is still hot!!!!
0
Colonel Plink

March 21, 2007 03:56
I didn't see much difference between halle Berry's "before" and "after" pics. I'd stil hit it like a gypsy hit a tambourine.
0
shoff14

March 21, 2007 04:11
quote:Originally posted by Colonel Plink
I didn't see much difference between halle Berry's "before" and "after" pics. I'd stil hit it like a gypsy hit a tambourine.

same here
0
beantownshootah

March 21, 2007 05:32
quote:Originally posted by spanielsells
Being a little fair here...

Some of these "before" pictures are literally a decade old. People age.

Second of all, these "before" pictures are all staged. The "after" pictures are the few opportunities the paparrazi get and they wouldn't be flattering no matter how they were taken.

Third of all, some of these "after" pictures aren't bad. Halle Barry, Julia Roberts, and Charlize Theron aren't what I would classify as ugly in the pictures, they just look more average than not.

Agreed.

Its kind of nice to see this images from time to time to remind yourself that even the super elevated celebrities are still human (and how much they are primped to appear in front of the camera), but in the end this is a comparison of the best vs. the worst.

You're comparing a picture of someone at their prime, in full professional makeup, that has been selected (in some cases out of dozens of pictures) to make them look as good as possible, with a picture of them waking up first thing in the morning, with no makeup, bad hair, bad angle, bad lighting, etc.

In some of the cases (Cher, Michael Jackson, Hawn) there have plastic surgeries in between the pictures. In these and other cases, there are ten years (or more) between the pictures. Nobody is going to look as good at 40 as they did at 25.

You can take a picture of *anybody* and make them look bad, if that's what you are trying to do.

Likewise, with enough artifice, you can make almost anyone look decent.
0
He Dog

March 21, 2007 07:21
Personally I don't think Tom Cruise is more interesting in one photo than the other. Same with Penelope Cuze, she is just hard for me to look at.
0
The Ginral

March 21, 2007 08:41
He Dog:

About Penelope....did you word your comment wrong?? [:D] (Cuz I get hard lookin' at her). [:p][}:)]

I'm interested in what she CAN look like whether she looks that way all the time or not.
0
goldeneagle76

March 21, 2007 11:20
wow, they do get knocked down a few pegs with no makeup on. That's why I've always liked women that didn't need make-up. My wife included!!!
0
Kodiakk

March 21, 2007 13:32
They are taking those pictures at the worst possible moments. Several look as if the star were crying. Anyone women doesn't exactly look great when she is crying. Most of them that don't look like they are crying look as if they just woke up.
0
Odawgp

March 21, 2007 13:49
Goldie isn't the only one...
I saw a pic of Faith Hill without her face on and OMG [:0]
nothing worse than seeing what you thought to be a fine looking women, looking like the Crypt Keeper.[:0]

She's never looked the same.[:(!][V]
0