vector semi uzi
I have had bad luck with a norinco 320 semi auto. Curently considering a Vector semi auto uzi.. anyone have a good or bad word about these SEMI AUTO carbines?????
0
-
one thing I read about Vector uzi's (if that's the right co.) is that they got ahold of a bunch of pre-1986 uzi receivers that were supposed to be very good because Vector then heat treated them to last longer. now, if you're looking at semi receivers, that probably means they made them themselves, instead of surplus IDF receivers, but what that means to you is, they might have heat treated them also. check it out. if so, it's a plus. 0 -
oh yeah! they look cool too 0 -
My local class 3 has several Ingram Mac10 full autos for around $4000. I think they are mostly unfired condition. I've been considering getting one.
This is pretty nice - if I had the 10k...
http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewItem.asp?Item=633739170 -
quote:Originally posted by Duke Hogge
I have had bad luck with a norinco 320 semi auto. Curently considering a Vector semi auto uzi.. anyone have a good or bad word about these SEMI AUTO carbines?????
I have the same gun. It's is a piece of crap. My dad has worked on it more than a few times to try to get it to even function. For some reason my dad has a big interest in it.
Maybe we should start a support group for 320 owners.
Traci0 -
Certainly all the semi auto guns can not be so unreliable as the 320.......Can they?? So far I have not seen anyone saying how great there SA uzi works.....The function and durability of the open bolt FA is tried and true, without question. The closed bolt guns are a differant animal. Apparently still prized by collecters but do they function well or like so many outher 9mm carbines just for show??? 0
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Comments
5 comments