Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

Pelosi ?????

Comments

32 comments

  • dheffley
    What's wrong with you? She's just trying to save the world from Bush! He's the real terrorist, remember?
    0
  • Jgreen
    DOES THIS CONSTITUE A GOP FLIP FLOP?

    On the April 1 edition of Fox Broadcasting Co.'s Fox News Sunday, Weekly Standard editor and Fox News contributor Bill Kristol repeated an attack by the White House on House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) for planning to go to Syria while her bipartisan delegation is traveling in the Middle East this week. But, as the weblog Think Progress reported on March 30, a Republican-led congressional delegation is also visiting Syria, a trip that the White House has apparently not criticized similarly. Kristol did not mention the reported Republican-led trip to Syria, much less the inconsistency in the White House's criticism of Pelosi's trip and its silence on the Republican-led trip.

    On April 1, the Associated Press reported that a delegation of House members including Reps. Frank Wolf (R-VA), Rep. Joe Pitts (R-PA), and Rep. Robert Aderholt (R-AL) had met with Syrian President Bashar Assad, two days before Pelosi's planned meeting.
    0
  • dakotashooter2
    I am starting to fear this woman as much as Hillary. I think she is looking toward the same goal.

    Part of the problem is women do not understand war and warfare and never will. It's a "male" thing.
    0
  • sig232
    quote:Originally posted by Jgreen
    DOES THIS CONSTITUE A GOP FLIP FLOP?

    On the April 1 edition of Fox Broadcasting Co.'s Fox News Sunday, Weekly Standard editor and Fox News contributor Bill Kristol repeated an attack by the White House on House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) for planning to go to Syria while her bipartisan delegation is traveling in the Middle East this week. But, as the weblog Think Progress reported on March 30, a Republican-led congressional delegation is also visiting Syria, a trip that the White House has apparently not criticized similarly. Kristol did not mention the reported Republican-led trip to Syria, much less the inconsistency in the White House's criticism of Pelosi's trip and its silence on the Republican-led trip.

    On April 1, the Associated Press reported that a delegation of House members including Reps. Frank Wolf (R-VA), Rep. Joe Pitts (R-PA), and Rep. Robert Aderholt (R-AL) had met with Syrian President Bashar Assad, two days before Pelosi's planned meeting.



    They had to go to clue the leader into the fact that Pelosi was a nutcase and just to nod your head, play along and send her on her merry way.
    0
  • COLT
    ...she's an arrognat pompous pig. All the known terrorist groups are praising her! he he, wonder why? BECAUSE they know she is a memeber of the "retreat & defeat" party! The terroist like that, it goes in their favor!!!

    ...Just as they threw their support behind 'ol Franken-Kerry!
    Must really bite to know your parties agenda is such that it SUPPORTS everything the terrorist support!!! It HAS to SUCK to be a Dim!!!!

    ...She is not a head of state, she has NO authority to do ANYTHING to further ANY truce, peace negotiations or anything else!

    The Syrian diaper head is using her bigtime, and she is so wrapped up in trying to furthe her (dims) agenda...she is too stupid to realize it, or just doesn't care.

    Surprise Putz Pelosi! It is all backfiring on you and the dims!
    Americans do not like terroists sympathizers like you and most of the dims! Ha Ha, boy did you dims read the last election results ALL wrong!!! The American people may not all be for the war, but they damn sure don't want to loose by retreating either!!

    ...I voted in Nov for one IN., one Dem (mistake) and the rest Repubs....after what these idiots (dims) have pulled since Jan (nothing actually except tax wasting money for bogus non binding resolutions, the BIGGEST tax hike in history!and in general NOTHING)
    I will NEVER vote for a DIM again!!! The brain dead dims make my skin crawl, and make me nauesous...[;)]


    ani-texas-flag-1.gif
    0
  • dheffley
    quote:Originally posted by Jgreen
    DOES THIS CONSTITUE A GOP FLIP FLOP?

    On the April 1 edition of Fox Broadcasting Co.'s Fox News Sunday, Weekly Standard editor and Fox News contributor Bill Kristol repeated an attack by the White House on House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) for planning to go to Syria while her bipartisan delegation is traveling in the Middle East this week. But, as the weblog Think Progress reported on March 30, a Republican-led congressional delegation is also visiting Syria, a trip that the White House has apparently not criticized similarly. Kristol did not mention the reported Republican-led trip to Syria, much less the inconsistency in the White House's criticism of Pelosi's trip and its silence on the Republican-led trip.

    On April 1, the Associated Press reported that a delegation of House members including Reps. Frank Wolf (R-VA), Rep. Joe Pitts (R-PA), and Rep. Robert Aderholt (R-AL) had met with Syrian President Bashar Assad, two days before Pelosi's planned meeting.


    Did it ever dawn on you that the Whitehouse doesn't speak for us and whether they do or not, some of us think that none of them, republican or democrat, should be visiting Syria?

    Some folks just don't get it. They think you either have to agree with the republicans or the democrats 100%. Some folks aren't sheeple and have their own opinion.
    0
  • nord
    The comment about females not understanding war...

    Maybe we've forgotten Margaret Thatcher. That lady understood just about everything!
    0
  • BT3
    Big difference between the Speaker of the House and some 1st term Congressman fron Idaho or wherever ! They knew she was going to screw it up and that's why they ask her not to go. And yes, most people think neither party should go there. [}:)]
    0
  • Jgreen
    I'm no fan of syria, but you can't talk only to the people you like...
    0
  • dheffley
    quote:Originally posted by Jgreen
    I'm no fan of syria, but you can't talk only to the people you like...


    The talking needs to be done through the Secretary of State, not whoever wants to go talk politics like the GOP's or the Dem's. Kind of like the chain of command thing in the military. Pelosi is stepping out of line, and so were the republican senators.
    0
  • Jgreen
    Agreed, to a certain extent. To what extent, I can't say.

    I guess when we have who we have in positions like prez, vp, etc., perhaps we do need someone who is lower on the chain of command to take the bull by the horns. It's like knowing that if you are dealing with Judge so and so, forget him. His clerk or secretary is the one that knows what's going on....
    0
  • dolfan
    Too bad the Syrians didn't take her hostage.
    0
  • Colt Super
    How do you really feel, Heff ??

    Doug
    0
  • Rocklobster
    And people say George Bush is stupid.
    0
  • acdodd
    quote:Originally posted by dolfan
    Too bad the Syrians didn't take her hostage.



    Why would they take her hostage.
    She is on their side.
    0
  • nemesisenforcer
    quote:Originally posted by Jgreen
    DOES THIS CONSTITUE A GOP FLIP FLOP?

    On the April 1 edition of Fox Broadcasting Co.'s Fox News Sunday, Weekly Standard editor and Fox News contributor Bill Kristol repeated an attack by the White House on House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) for planning to go to Syria while her bipartisan delegation is traveling in the Middle East this week. But, as the weblog Think Progress reported on March 30, a Republican-led congressional delegation is also visiting Syria, a trip that the White House has apparently not criticized similarly. Kristol did not mention the reported Republican-led trip to Syria, much less the inconsistency in the White House's criticism of Pelosi's trip and its silence on the Republican-led trip.

    On April 1, the Associated Press reported that a delegation of House members including Reps. Frank Wolf (R-VA), Rep. Joe Pitts (R-PA), and Rep. Robert Aderholt (R-AL) had met with Syrian President Bashar Assad, two days before Pelosi's planned meeting.


    In all likelihood, probably not because the Republican delegation was probably carrying a message consistent with the administration's position if it had any message to begin with. Pelosi, on the other hand, is trying to undermine the president and his authority as spokesman and policy maker on foreign relations and trying to elevate herself into a policy maker, spokesman, secretary of state, and well wisher to our enemies. She's dangerous and her activity verges on treason, if you ask me.
    0
  • rdcinmn
    quote:In all likelihood, probably not because the Republican delegation was probably carrying a message consistent with the administration's position if it had any message to begin with. Pelosi, on the other hand, is trying to undermine the president and his authority as spokesman and policy maker on foreign relations and trying to elevate herself into a policy maker, spokesman, secretary of state, and well wisher to our enemies. She's dangerous and her activity verges on treason, if you ask me.

    And if that wasn't enough she also falsly represented herself as a meadator(sp?) for Isreal[xx(]
    0
  • nemesisenforcer
    quote:Originally posted by rdcinmn
    quote:In all likelihood, probably not because the Republican delegation was probably carrying a message consistent with the administration's position if it had any message to begin with. Pelosi, on the other hand, is trying to undermine the president and his authority as spokesman and policy maker on foreign relations and trying to elevate herself into a policy maker, spokesman, secretary of state, and well wisher to our enemies. She's dangerous and her activity verges on treason, if you ask me.

    And if that wasn't enough she also falsly represented herself as a meadator(sp?) for Isreal[xx(]


    M E D I A T O R

    What gall. I'm sure this was news to Israel.
    0
  • dheffley
    quote:Originally posted by Jgreen
    Agreed, to a certain extent. To what extent, I can't say.

    I guess when we have who we have in positions like prez, vp, etc., perhaps we do need someone who is lower on the chain of command to take the bull by the horns. It's like knowing that if you are dealing with Judge so and so, forget him. His clerk or secretary is the one that knows what's going on....


    He's the Commander in Chief. She MUST recognize her position and his position, and honor them. I don't care who sits in the White house, if we allow the opponents to "take the bull by the horns", democracy is finished! Have you ever seen a Lieutenant decide a Captain wasn't doing right and "take the bull by the horns"? It's not a pretty sight, at least in the Corps.
    0
  • Slow_Hand
    If you're a Conservative, then this is EXACTLY what you want to see leading up to the 2008 elections. Democratic Party arrogance, hubris, haughtiness, and kow-towing to the likes of Syria. I hope more Dems take these trips, just to piss off and disenchant as many voting Americans as is possible. Maybe Nacncy will meet with Hugo Chavez next or the greasy little twerp from Iran. The Conservatives need as much fodder as they can lay their hands upon between now and then. Or, we are DOOMED!
    0
  • warriorsfan
    quote:Originally posted by COLT
    ...She is not a head of state, she has NO authority to do ANYTHING to further ANY truce, peace negotiations or anything else!


    Do you feel the same way about the Republican-led Congressional delegations that travelled to North Korea once in 2003 and twice in 2005 to negotiate and ease international tensions, or the two Congressional delegations that went to Libya in 2004 for the same purpose? Or is it only bad if a Democrat does it? You guys do realize that you look like total hypocrites, right?
    0
  • TRAP55
    07.gif
    0
  • mrseatle
    puppet
    0
  • EVILDR235
    Biting her tongue or Nancy's ?
    If they took her(Nancy) hostage,they would return her in less than 24 hours.Ever see the movie RANSOM FOR RED CHIEF ? She (Nancy) can't be married to a man can she ?
    XXXXXX
    0
  • aramisvi
    hasn't been laid in 40+ years
    0
  • RobatHrly
    Given the traditional view of Middle Eastern people towards women, why would they take anything she said seriously anyway?
    0
  • nemesisenforcer
    quote:Originally posted by RobatHrly
    Given the traditional view of Middle Eastern people towards women, why would they take anything she said seriously anyway?


    precisely because she's "anti-bush" and anti-american, whether she admits it or not.
    0
  • stankemp
    The new "Jane"
    0
  • zipperzap
    Ha ha - beat me to it - was going to comment that it sure
    looks like a 'Fonda stunt', to me![:D]
    0
  • Captplaid
    Jane Pelosi's actions is rather insulting, childish and very foolish. She is not speaking for America. She was not representing Israel either when she claimed they were ready to negotiate. Perhaps, she should let the state department do their job!

    Is Condi Rice going to start writing legislation next? Is General Petraious going to lead the reformation of welfare?

    Maybe Pelosi should worry more about doing her own job before she loses her majority.
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity

Didn’t find what you’re looking for?