Black Snake Moan
was lame.
the story was a good idea, and samuel l. jackson was the right person to do it with, but whoever made that movie was just coming from somewhere else. samuel l. jackson couldn't put the mojo on them to do it any different, so it looked like he was just there to collect a paycheck. they all were, really. lame-o.
I didn't even get to the part where he chains the chick to the refrigetrator or whatever, I just left.
the story was a good idea, and samuel l. jackson was the right person to do it with, but whoever made that movie was just coming from somewhere else. samuel l. jackson couldn't put the mojo on them to do it any different, so it looked like he was just there to collect a paycheck. they all were, really. lame-o.
I didn't even get to the part where he chains the chick to the refrigetrator or whatever, I just left.
0
-
I don't understand your post but notice the three main points are:
A chick chained to a refridgetrator.
Samual L. Jackson
Reference to "Black Snake"
What would Freud have to say about that? [}:)][:0]0 -
quote:Originally posted by p3skyking
I don't understand your post but notice the three main points are:
A chick chained to a refridgetrator.
Samual L. Jackson
Reference to "Black Snake"
What would Freud have to say about that? [}:)][:0]
You forgot the "white girl" part. No, wait. That wasn't in the post. Never mind.0 -
my bag! it's a movie, I went to go see it. it's about an old blues man (samuel l. jackson) who finds a girl on the side of the road left for dead, she turns out to be a nymphomaniac, so he chains her up for a while to make her not a nymphomaniac.
well, it sounded good.0 -
quote:Originally posted by buschmaster
my bag! it's a movie, I went to go see it. it's about an old blues man (samuel l. jackson) who finds a girl on the side of the road left for dead, she turns out to be a nymphomaniac, so he chains her up for a while to make her not a nymphomaniac.
well, it sounded good.
Is this a musical?0 -
Looks interesting. Harkens back to the sexploitation films of the '60s and '70s. At any rate, it's different from most of the rest of the predictable and pointless tripe that Hollywood usually churns out (though there have been some good movies recently and some more on the way hopefully) so if for no other reason than that, I'll probably support it. 0 -
"Sticks and Stones
May break my bones-
But whips and chains
Excite me!" [:p]0 -
quote:Originally posted by nemesisenforcer
Looks interesting. Harkens back to the sexploitation films of the '60s and '70s. At any rate, it's different from most of the rest of the predictable and pointless tripe that Hollywood usually churns out (though there have been some good movies recently and some more on the way hopefully) so if for no other reason than that, I'll probably support it.dude... it was predictable and pointless tripe.0 -
quote:Originally posted by buschmaster
quote:Originally posted by nemesisenforcer
Looks interesting. Harkens back to the sexploitation films of the '60s and '70s. At any rate, it's different from most of the rest of the predictable and pointless tripe that Hollywood usually churns out (though there have been some good movies recently and some more on the way hopefully) so if for no other reason than that, I'll probably support it.dude... it was predictable and pointless tripe.
yea, but it's got Christina Ricci in panties. . .
What other movie has that?0 -
dunno... she's got the body of Halle Berry, but the face of Lars Ulrich. yecch.
she runs around all over in her panties. there's this one shot where she's laying on the bed, and if that's what you like to see... you'll definitely get it! it's like a scratch-n-sniff.0
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Comments
9 comments