Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

Noah's Ark found long ago

Comments

39 comments

  • 65gto389
    Dont some really ancient maps actually show antartica as a land mass and not ice covered?

    It could be possible that the great flood covered the land mass and simply froze over.
    0
  • givette
    I'm not a biblical scholar. At least I admit it. Cant address if, or if not events happened.

    But the discovery of the carbon-decay constant (carbon dating) sure as hell throws the biblical time-line out the window. Joe
    0
  • bigtire
    Titanium rivits!

    I'll bet Bat Boy forged them!

    78529007.jpg
    0
  • COLT
    ...The wood that was recovered from an earlier expedition and then again in 87 and later carbon dated, was tested again in the last few years with more advanced dating technology and that test showed the original date was wrong; the wood was not nearly old enough to have come from the ark...[;)]

    ani-texas-flag-1.gif
    0
  • Permanently deleted user
    I have no idea if this is Noah's Ark, but I do believe in a literal interpretation of the Bible. I also believe in the inerrancy (sp?) of Scripture. Some of you guys are attacking RJ here over things that you cannot possibly prove are wrong. Just as much as RJ is going on faith that some of these things are correct, you are going on faith that they are incorrect...like how old Noah lived to be. It's an issue of faith. You have yours and he has his.

    RJ can be out there some times, but whether or not he believes in the inerrancy of Scripture is no reason to attack him personally. All true Christians believe the same...or at least all Christians who've grown and matured in their faith. There is a slight possibility that someone who was just saved, might not completely grasp and understand that truth yet.
    0
  • Oklahoma223
    quote:Originally posted by ECC
    I have no idea if this is Noah's Ark, but I do believe in a literal interpretation of the Bible. I also believe in the inerrancy (sp?) of Scripture. Some of you guys are attacking RJ here over things that you cannot possibly prove are wrong. Just as much as RJ is going on faith that some of these things are correct, you are going on faith that they are incorrect...like how old Noah lived to be. It's an issue of faith. You have yours and he has his.

    RJ can be out there some times, but whether or not he believes in the inerrancy of Scripture is no reason to attack him personally. All true Christians believe the same...or at least all Christians who've grown and matured in their faith. There is a slight possibility that someone who was just saved, might not completely grasp and understand that truth yet.


    What he said.
    0
  • Sav99
    I certainly do believe that the literal flood occured. And I also believe that the ark came to rest somewhere on the mountains of Ararat. I am scepticle however, as this seems to be headed up by the Turkish tourism bureau and has not previously been made public. Further more, I dought that GOD would provide such "proof" where by effectively eliminating faith (Blessed is he who believes but has not seen). Proof is in direct oppostion to faith. We have all the proof we need in the person of the living Christ. Just my 2 cents.
    0
  • mateomasfeo
    Do the V.I.N. numbers match?
    0
  • buschmaster
    hhmm... if they do find what they think is noah's ark, it would be interesting to see if there is hair, teeth, dung, claw marks, etc. anywhere on it or nearby from all the animals that were supposedly on it.

    anybody think of that? or is there just "a" peice of wood to go by, that they are calling "noah's ark".
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity