Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

Carbine in 45/70 vs one in .454

Comments

6 comments

  • guntech59
    I'd go with the Marlin just because I'm more familiar with them and the ammo would probably be more widely available.
    0
  • Nwcid
    I am a 45/70 fan. I know the standard 300-400gr loads are not bad to shoot. It is a big heavy slow kick. Keep in mind a standard 405gr 45/70 rd is only going about 1800fps, you can almost watch it like a golf ball [:D].

    Advantages to the .454 is there are common pistols chamberd in them too. Yes I know there are 45/70 pistols too. I dont know about the .454 rifle but I know in the pistols you can shoot .45 long Colt for cheeper shooting.
    0
  • tsavo303
    45-70
    light cowboy loads all the way to 500 solids!
    0
  • wtroper
    454 in a revolver is a "hoss." In a rifle it is very mild -- at least it was in my Browning 78. Not very impressive performance for me. I sold it. The 45-70 is much much more gun.
    0
  • Sig220_Ruger77
    I tossed around the idea of getting the Puma .454 Casull a while back, but elected to go with the 45/70 instead. The Pumas' are nice rifles, but they don't even compare to the Marlins'. You will find that the 45/70 has a much smoother action and the rifle is built like a "tank". Add in the fact that you can shoot a great deal of different bullet weights as compared to the .454 and I think that it is clear which is the better caliber. However(as mentioned before), I would consider the .454 if I were pairing it with a sidearm in the same caliber.

    Jon
    0
  • SCorvers
    Maybe if the .454 was offered in the Marlin. Marlin makes a better riffle hands down.
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity