Cafferty on Ron Paul.. best footage yet!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xXe7cOsWjwkwooohhoooo I love Ron Paul.
btw, heres a nice article about Fred Thompson:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/04/us/politics/04thompson.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
0
-
Ron Paul... isn't that the guy that sells Ginsu Knives and chicken cookers on TV at three in the morning? 0 -
Great video. I love that they added he'd been married so long. 0 -
ron pauls solution to foreign policy.....do nothing and the world will be fine. sounds to me like mr paul never went beyond 1938. oh well, at least no one is voting for him. 0 -
quote:Originally posted by BarkingDog
ron pauls solution to foreign policy.....do nothing and the world will be fine. sounds to me like mr paul never went beyond 1938. oh well, at least no one is voting for him.
You're mistaken turd.0 -
I believe your response belongs in the "Politics" forum.
Isn't that where they do all the name calling like children?0 -
quote:Originally posted by Alpine
I believe your response belongs in the "Politics" forum.
Isn't that where they do all the name calling like children?
You really should think out your posts better.0 -
Speaking of turd...here's the famous Turd Ferguson. This bit makes me cry every time I see it.[:D]
http://www.metacafe.com/watch/191156/snl_celebrity_jeopardy/0 -
quote:ron pauls solution to foreign policy.....do nothing and the world will be fine. sounds to me like mr paul never went beyond 1938. oh well, at least no one is voting for him.
No, it is a non-interventionist policy, the CORRECT policy. We have no business messing in the internal politics of another sovereign nation.
Please people, it's the presidency, educate yourselves. Research is NOT sitting and listening to political pundits. They really don't give a whit about you.0 -
quote:Originally posted by jpwolf
Please people, it's the presidency, educate yourselves. Research is NOT sitting and listening to political pundits. They really don't give a whit about you.
Turd Ferguson cares about you. Vote for Turd Ferguson.[:D]0 -
Ron just raised 5 million in the last quarter. He's slowly gaining ground but it won't be enough. 0 -
A nation of people suckling on the Beasts teat.
Unable or unwilling to think for themselves..personal responsibility being meaningless to them..limits on a governments powers and reach is totally foreign to them.
The Constitution is DEAD..so anybody talking about it is a freak amd 'nutjob'..they have been taught by careful propaganda that whatever the government wants to do..is right and just.
Ignorance is bliss.
They will cry and cry and curse God when the Elites collapse it all around their ears..they will NEVER blame the Elite..or THEMSELVES.0 -
I agree with alot Ron Paul has to say,I disagree with alot of it too,the main problem with him is the fact he just cannot win the election,if he gets the repub nod,Hilary will be your next president without a doubt,atleast Fred has a chance of beating her,if we get that damned Yankee from New York City or that old liberial Idiot from Arizona I just want vote 0 -
I don't know what is going on in your head, but Ron Paul is the only one in the running for the GOP nomination that has a chance of beating Hillary.
In fact, I think he would absolutely crush Hillary once the media is forced to focus on Ron Paul vs Hillary.0 -
Let me be quite clear about this.
The savagely angry part of me HOPES you get your Globalists..the freds or the Guleonies.
You deserve the degradations they wish to bring upon you.
You deserve them because you refuse to stand for America...you deserve them because you refuse to THINK.
The coldly rational part of me still hopes there is enough bedrock people left in this country for the Republic to continue to stand.
Are you all such cowards as to continue to vote for GARBAGE..because you really think Hillary is so much 'worse' ? Afraid to buckle down and resist every move she might make..while smugly watching T.V. as your man sells you out quietly..just as the man in power today does ?0 -
quote:Originally posted by CA sucks
I don't know what is going on in your head, but Ron Paul is the only one in the running for the GOP nomination that has a chance of beating Hillary.
In fact, I think he would absolutely crush Hillary once the media is forced to focus on Ron Paul vs Hillary.
100% I will vote for Ron if he is nominated. But I disagree about Guliani. I think he is the ONLY candidate that has a chance if the Dims are dumb enough to nominate Hillary. I think Rudy would make a good president and I will vote for him if nominated.0 -
Wow. A gunowner who will vote for Giuliani. That's hard to believe.
In fact amazing.[V]0 -
quote:Originally posted by slipgate
quote:Originally posted by CA sucks
I don't know what is going on in your head, but Ron Paul is the only one in the running for the GOP nomination that has a chance of beating Hillary.
In fact, I think he would absolutely crush Hillary once the media is forced to focus on Ron Paul vs Hillary.
100% I will vote for Ron if he is nominated. But I disagree about Guliani. I think he is the ONLY candidate that has a chance if the Dims are dumb enough to nominate Hillary. I think Rudy would make a good president and I will vote for him if nominated.
No disrespect, but an absolutely PERFECT illustration of the problem.
The old standby position, "well at least our turd is better than the other sides turd".
**The following rant is not personal to you slipgate, but to the position and the general voter who takes such a position you espouse.
**Begin rant**Forget your own principals, integrity and ethics. Forget the future of America. Ignore the clear and easily tracked past political history of the "lesser of two evils". Forget voting for someone who would "do the right thing" and follow the constitution. Vote for a globalist/socialist/massive fed supporting/entitlement giving/big-gov neo-con, out of fear of the "other turd" getting elected. **End rant**
The two party fed system has an absolute lock on the American Populace.[V]0 -
hmm.. I don't understand. I like Ron Paul the best and will vote for him in the primarys. If he loses (which is likely) and Rudy Guiliani gets the nomination, I will happily vote for him in the election next year. I think that Rudy has a real chance against Hillary due to him being a "Liberal Republican". The other candidates like McCain don't have much of a chance against any Democrat.
I voted for Ross Perot for President as well knowing full well he had no chance of winning.0 -
quote:Originally posted by slipgate
hmm.. I don't understand. I like Ron Paul the best and will vote for him in the primarys. If he loses (which is likely) and Rudy Guiliani gets the nomination, I will happily vote for him in the election next year. I think that Rudy has a real chance against Hillary due to him being a "Liberal Republican". The other candidates like McCain don't have much of a chance against any Democrat.
I voted for Ross Perot for President as well knowing full well he had no chance of winning.
I respect any person that honestly believes his actions are in the best interests of the country. Personally, I would prefer a Clinton Presidency than supporting yet another big-government Republican. If we tell the Republican leadership that we will vote for anyone so long as there is something about them to the right of the Democrat, we have lost our party and frankly, our country.
Unless Paul is nominated, I will not be voting for the Republican Party come November '08. I will never again support an organization that his hell-bent upon increasing Government at the expense of my Rights, Freedoms, and Bank Account. The only way I can see to change the course of the Party (which is the goal) is to withhold that upon which they depend to survive.0 -
Only 30% of america supports continuing the war.
Any candidate running on a pro war platform, is doomed.
Therefore Gulliani is doomed.
Even if he wins, do you really want another politician that thinks they have the right to spy on you, the right to take your guns, etc?
Gulliani is worse than Hillary, will be exposed as a flip flopped (guns, abortion, etc). If it gets down to Hill vs Guli, Hills campaign will destroy Gulliani, who won't even have support from some typical repub groups like the NRA voters or some christian orgs.
Ron Paul on the other hand, can easily speak about what she has said about the war, compared to her voting record on the war, without being a hypocrit. He can expose her for the lieing sack of feces she is, while preaching integrity and limits for our government, and people will believe him, because his voting record proves it.
Ron Paul is the only option I see where my vote won't be going to support someone who is going to actively destroy our country.0 -
+1 0 -
quote:Originally posted by slipgate
I voted for Ross Perot for President as well knowing full well he had no chance of winning.
Thanks for giving us Clinton...
Three times!![V]0 -
quote:Originally posted by ripley16
quote:Originally posted by slipgate
I voted for Ross Perot for President as well knowing full well he had no chance of winning.
Thanks for giving us Clinton...
Three times!![V]
lol! Don't blame me, blame people that voted their party because they, "didn't want to throw their vote away". If Ross had gotten in, we'd be the richest and best nation in the world again!0
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Comments
23 comments