Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

8 MM for deer ?

Comments

14 comments

  • Huntingnerd33
    [:D][:D] Nice, probably a little too good.[:D]
    0
  • allen griggs
    This guy is an irresponsible hunter. You need to know what is behind your target, in case the bullet passes through. He didn't even know he had hit the other two deer, so he could have just as easily have blown their legs off, as killed them.
    0
  • Doc
    I agree it's sloppy hunting. Also suspect he was using FMJ Mil-Surp ammp to get that much penetration. Illegal just about everywhere, I think.
    0
  • sig232
    If you have a tag for one deer how do you deal with the Game Warden?? [;)][;)][:0][:0]
    0
  • Jacob2008
    I have an 8mm mauser, one my grandpa gave to me...

    I didnt think it could do that much though, 3 deer? Wow...

    Oh well, ill just shoot into a hill so its gonna stop [;)]
    0
  • select-fire
    I would believe two is possible to line up and shoot. 3 ? I would have had to been there and seen it.
    0
  • FEENIX
    quote:Originally posted by allen griggs
    This guy is an irresponsible hunter. You need to know what is behind your target, in case the bullet passes through. He didn't even know he had hit the other two deer, so he could have just as easily have blown their legs off, as killed them.


    DITT[V]!
    0
  • jabronij3
    several pessemists here huh?
    0
  • tr fox
    Lucky there was the third deer to stop the bullet. Otherwise the bullet may have continued on for a long ways and killed somebody. If I am going to shoot, and I think the back stop won't stop the bullet, I will not shoot.

    There was a German officer in WWII who, for fun, would line up 10 or so prisoners back-to-back and shoot the first one in the chest. The game was to see how many men he could kill with only one bullet. Highest he ever got was 8 men I believe. This might have been more common than I know about.
    0
  • matwor
    quote:Originally posted by select-fire
    I would believe two is possible to line up and shoot. 3 ? I would have had to been there and seen it.


    How many do you want to line up, 6, 8, 12, 15????

    deeryard.jpg
    0
  • Permanently deleted user
    He was hunting from a stand, so he, more than likely knew the bullet would impact the ground not too far behind the deer. This could have been a completely safe shot and some of you are jumping the gun here...no pun intended. You can easily take a 500 yard shot and still know where your bullet is going to impact...as a matter of fact, the longer the shot, the quicker that bullet is going to hit dirt after encountering it's intended target. All you really need to know is that the area behind the deer, in the bullets path, is clear from humans, livestock, etc. Remember...some of us hunt for meat and would consider ourselves darn lucky in his situation...even though he never intended to have that outcome.
    0
  • allen griggs
    Initially he did not know that he had hit the second and third deer. He was not trying to hit them. They were standing behind the deer he fired at, and he did not care whether the bullet was going to hit the other two deer. He could have easily made gut shots, or blown the jaw off of the second and third deer, and they would have gone off into the woods and suffered for days before they died. He did not care if this happened, as long as he got his shot at the first deer.
    0
  • elkoholic
    Sloppy and irresponsible, now if he had done it on purpose then it would just be unethical and irresponsible.
    0
  • jabronij3
    quote:Originally posted by elkoholic
    Sloppy and irresponsible, now if he had done it on purpose then it would just be unethical and irresponsible.
    nah it'd be economically sound, one shot three deer let's go home! oh yeah! hey dude got a rope? I gotta bullet!
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity

Didn’t find what you’re looking for?