aside from being twice the cost of a P3AT...
if you had a choice for a pocket gun, would you choose the P3AT or the Kahr PM9 and why? I've held both but have not been able to shoot either one yet. The PM9 is not that much bigger and I like the idea of 9mm over a 380. Pocket holsters can be bought for either.
0
-
No experience with the PM9, but I love my P3AT. Use a leather wallet holster in my back pocket. Jeans or shorts, it doesn't matter. Very light.
I've also used to carry a Kel-Tec P-11. Use a holster in my front pocket, but I found it to be too heavy.0 -
I carry a PM9. Cost is not a factor in reliability. Kahr eats anything and is fairly accurate. 0 -
It is entirely a matter of personal preference. I actually like the .380 for a concealable and controlable pocket gun, and for many/most personal defense scenarios IN MY AREA this is adequate because a comfortable carry gun rarely gets left home. The 9mm has more punch, but then so does a 12 gauge shotgun. 0 -
Have never held or shot either, however, here is a comparison chart for your consideration:
http://www.mouseguns.com/PocketAutoComparison.pdf0 -
Kahr eats anything and is VERY accurate.
I have a P3AT, but carry a Kahr P45.
I love em both, but the Kahr reigns supreme.0 -
between the two the Kahr and before the Kel Tec I would go with the firestorm or the Bersa 0 -
quote:Originally posted by Polite Psycho
Have never held or shot either, however, here is a comparison chart for your consideration:
http://www.mouseguns.com/PocketAutoComparison.pdf
thanks for the link, I was looking for it earlier and could not remember the name. added it to my "favorites" online now.0
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Comments
7 comments