zipperzap and ecc
Did I miss something??? maybe I am just not thinking right...but who ever asked the question about DNR and starving,I didnt understand.
Because In the entire discussion I didnt see anything wrong.JUST someone who had a question and there is no such thing as a dumb question..And it really doesnt matter what is going on.
So no apoligies are needed just a thank you for thinking about my family and myself and for all the prayers....
Thanks again[:)][:)][:)][^]
Because In the entire discussion I didnt see anything wrong.JUST someone who had a question and there is no such thing as a dumb question..And it really doesnt matter what is going on.
So no apoligies are needed just a thank you for thinking about my family and myself and for all the prayers....
Thanks again[:)][:)][:)][^]
0
-
Prayers will continue Dawnie. I asked the original question and it was whether or not DNR really meant that they could keep food from someone who was capable of surviving otherwise??? In other words, if I had a "Do not resusitate" order, would that allow my caregivers to withhold food from me if I was capable of surviving with it?
Zipper got into the middle of things and tried to start a whole new topic debating about whether or not it was ethical to "starve" someone who was capable of surviving otherwise. I thought his comments were inappropriate in David's thread and told him to start a new topic if he wanted to discuss the matter further.
My prayers will continue...[:)]0 -
ECC- A DNR is not consent to assisted suicide. A DNR means if you have a heart attack or a stroke, and were in need of immediate medical attention to survive. The DNR if on Hand and signed by a M.D. would legally mean that the EMT's would not attempt rescue. I sure hope if you do have a DNR, the physician signing it has done a better job explaining it than that. 0 -
quote:Zipper got into the middle of things and tried to start a whole new topic debating about whether or not it was ethical to "starve" someone who was capable of surviving otherwise. I thought his comments were inappropriate in David's thread and told him to start a new topic if he wanted to discuss the matter further.
One man's perception is another man's exception. No offense perceived here. It's my experience to note that those who pontificate get a little touchy sometimes. I'll accept that and move on. I have no need for a soapbox or to offend anyone ... nor even to direct someone to butt out of a thread started by someone other than himself. ... really, it ain't nothin to get hung about.[:D]0
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Comments
3 comments