Supporting the troops?
Feb 13, 2007
Bush budget plan cuts veterans health care
Cutbacks aimed to take effect after next president is in office
By Andrew Taylor THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
COMMENT BY HAIRY: Supporting the troops is not just yelling, "hooray hooray" when they come home. Where will all those people be who came out for Mr. Gray's homecoming be a year from now? He'll still be in the same condition, unfortunately, and lacking even more support than he has today.
WASHINGTON- The Bush administration plans to cut funding for veterans' health care two years from now - even as badly wounded troops returning from Iraq could overwhelm the system.
Bush is using the cuts, critics say, to help fulfill his pledge to balance the budget by 2012.
After an increase sought for next year, the Bush budget would turn current trends on their head. Even though the cost of providing medical care to veterans has been growing rapidly - by more than 10 percent in many years - White House budget documents assume consecutive cutbacks in 2009 and 2010 and a freeze thereafter.
The proposed cuts are unrealistic in light of recent VA budget trends - its medical care budget has risen every year for two decades and 83 percent in the six years since Bush took office - sowing suspicion that the White House is simply making them up to make its long-term deficit figures look better.
"Either the administration is willingly proposing massive cuts in VA health care," said U.S. Rep. Thomas C. Edwards, D-Texas, chairman of the panel overseeing the VA's budget. "Or its promise of a balanced budget by 2012 is based on completely unrealistic assumptions."
Edwards said that a more realistic estimate of veterans costs is $16 billion higher than the Bush estimate for 2012.
In fact, even the White House doesn't seem serious about the numbers. It says the long-term budget numbers don't represent actual administration policies. Similar cuts assumed in earlier budgets have been reversed.
The veterans cuts, said White House budget office spokesman Sean Kevelighan, "don't reflect any policy decisions. We'll revisit them when we do the (future) budgets."
The number of veterans coming into the VA health care system has been rising by about 5 percent a year as the number of people returning from Iraq with illnesses or injuries keep rising. Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans represent almost 5 percent of the VA's patient caseload, and many are returning from battle with grievous injuries requiring costly care, such as traumatic brain injuries.
All told, the VA expects to treat about 5.8 million patients next year, including 263,000 veterans from Iraq and Afghanistan.
The White House budget office, however, assumes that the veterans' medical services budget - up 83 percent since Bush took office and winning a big increase in Bush's proposed 2008 budget - can absorb a 2 percent cut the following year and remain essentially frozen for three years in a row after that.
"It's implausible," U.S. Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., said of the budget projections.
The White House made virtually identical assumptions last year - a big increase in the first year of the budget and cuts for every year thereafter to veterans medical care. Now, the White House estimate for 2008 is more than $4 billion higher than Bush figured last year.
Bush budget plan cuts veterans health care
Cutbacks aimed to take effect after next president is in office
By Andrew Taylor THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
COMMENT BY HAIRY: Supporting the troops is not just yelling, "hooray hooray" when they come home. Where will all those people be who came out for Mr. Gray's homecoming be a year from now? He'll still be in the same condition, unfortunately, and lacking even more support than he has today.
WASHINGTON- The Bush administration plans to cut funding for veterans' health care two years from now - even as badly wounded troops returning from Iraq could overwhelm the system.
Bush is using the cuts, critics say, to help fulfill his pledge to balance the budget by 2012.
After an increase sought for next year, the Bush budget would turn current trends on their head. Even though the cost of providing medical care to veterans has been growing rapidly - by more than 10 percent in many years - White House budget documents assume consecutive cutbacks in 2009 and 2010 and a freeze thereafter.
The proposed cuts are unrealistic in light of recent VA budget trends - its medical care budget has risen every year for two decades and 83 percent in the six years since Bush took office - sowing suspicion that the White House is simply making them up to make its long-term deficit figures look better.
"Either the administration is willingly proposing massive cuts in VA health care," said U.S. Rep. Thomas C. Edwards, D-Texas, chairman of the panel overseeing the VA's budget. "Or its promise of a balanced budget by 2012 is based on completely unrealistic assumptions."
Edwards said that a more realistic estimate of veterans costs is $16 billion higher than the Bush estimate for 2012.
In fact, even the White House doesn't seem serious about the numbers. It says the long-term budget numbers don't represent actual administration policies. Similar cuts assumed in earlier budgets have been reversed.
The veterans cuts, said White House budget office spokesman Sean Kevelighan, "don't reflect any policy decisions. We'll revisit them when we do the (future) budgets."
The number of veterans coming into the VA health care system has been rising by about 5 percent a year as the number of people returning from Iraq with illnesses or injuries keep rising. Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans represent almost 5 percent of the VA's patient caseload, and many are returning from battle with grievous injuries requiring costly care, such as traumatic brain injuries.
All told, the VA expects to treat about 5.8 million patients next year, including 263,000 veterans from Iraq and Afghanistan.
The White House budget office, however, assumes that the veterans' medical services budget - up 83 percent since Bush took office and winning a big increase in Bush's proposed 2008 budget - can absorb a 2 percent cut the following year and remain essentially frozen for three years in a row after that.
"It's implausible," U.S. Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., said of the budget projections.
The White House made virtually identical assumptions last year - a big increase in the first year of the budget and cuts for every year thereafter to veterans medical care. Now, the White House estimate for 2008 is more than $4 billion higher than Bush figured last year.
0
-
I'll tell you where Maine people will be a year from now and 20 years from now. They will still be remembering and supporting the Grays. Nobody said that the folks who were honoring this man and his family were showing support for the war or Bush.
You are perfectly justified in pointing out that the Bush administration is cutting VA funds, but, to somehow imply that this reflects on the people here is just plain wrong.0 -
2 years from now ! Wonder who will be President ? You might want to check the increases for the last 7 years then check the previous admins budget as it applies to the VA system, although never enough, we will continue to support our vets and do whatever it takes to insure they are taken care of. As a matter of fact, I will be in DC next month to meet with Indiana's reps on just such issues. 0
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Comments
2 comments