Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

U.S. Troops Died After, Not In, Sneak Attack

Comments

18 comments

  • woodshermit
    We've heard about England, Tilden, Abu Ghraib. Why does the military keep doing this sort of thing unless they have something to hide? It can't be politics since the military is non-political. Right?
    0
  • Dak To 68
    quote:Originally posted by woodshermit
    We've heard about England, Tilden, Abu Ghraib. Why does the military keep doing this sort of thing unless they have something to hide? It can't be politics since the military is non-political. Right?


    The military ceased being non political no later than the removal of Mac Arthur as Commander of the forces in the Korean War.. Probably long before, remember when they attacked the WW1 Veterans in the early '30s. I think Mac Arthur may have been the Commander there.
    0
  • nemesisenforcer
    It's bush's fault.
    0
  • woodshermit
    MacArthur was the commander.
    0
  • allen griggs
    This is a disquieting report. The insurgents had to pass guard positions manned by Iraqi Army troops. They were let right on through.
    Either the Iraqis are inept, or else they were in collaboration with the insurgents.
    The insurgents went to a lot of trouble to acquire American uniforms and the SUVs that Americans normally use. They spoke English, and the leader was allegedly blond. This tells of an increasing sophistication in the insurgent's tactics.
    They attacked a meeting of U.S. and Iraqis who were planning security for an upcoming religious holiday. The irony of this is not lost on the Iraqi people, and is not lost on the insurgents.
    The entire raid sounds like something that Francis Marion "The Swamp Fox" would have pulled off during the Revolution.

    Immediately after the attack, the Pentagon announced that no soldiers had been kidnapped, and "all U.S. troops were accounted for."
    This is now shown to be a lie.
    The Pentagon is good at it, they lied routinely during Vietnam.
    0
  • mlincoln
    Is there any chance that perhaps somebody, trying to figure out what the heck happened in a very confusing situation, made an honest mistake. Ever hear of the fog of war? Yeah, they got the details wrong, but a day or two later after they had time to figure everything out they got the details right.

    And think about this: what if those Iraqi guards hadn't chased after the vehicles and forced the insurgents to kill the troops and flee? Can you imagine what would have been done to them? I've got to say that a bullet in the head would be vastly preferable to whatever sickness those guys had planned.

    Good God, why don't we bring those guys home now? Here it is four years after the invasion and we've finally decided that it's OK to shoot the Iranians who've been supplying training and weapons. It took FOUR f
    years for somebody to decide that it's OK to shoot them. Before now, it was SOP to hold them for three or four days and release them. Oh, hey, you've got caught bringing portable SAMs into the country? Well, it's going to be three days in jail and a tongue lashing for you! This has got to be the most idiotically run war our country has ever fought.
    0
  • woodshermit
    Not likely to be an honest mistake. It's happened too many times. There is no genuine accountability. The grunts (and it seems everyone is a grunt in this war) pay the ultimate price and their families will suffer a lifetime of heartache.
    0
  • allen griggs
    "Is there any chance that perhaps somebody, trying to figure out what the heck happened in a very confusing situation, made an honest mistake. Ever hear of the fog of war? Yeah, they got the details wrong, but a day or two later after they had time to figure everything out they got the details right."

    Immediately after the attack the Pentagon said that no soldiers had been kidnapped. Now we know that they were kidnapped, and found some thirty miles away. It looks like a lie to me.
    It is naive to give the Pentagon the benefit of the doubt in these cases. They deliberately lied about the Pat Tillman death. They even lied to his own family, and they held to their lies for weeks, until so much of the truth finally came out that they were forced to admit that it was "friendly fire" that killed Tillman.
    That skinny little girl from West Virginia was characterized by the Pentagon as a hero, was given medals for valor, when the truth was she did nothing more than get knocked out in a car wreck. She never even fired her weapon.
    The Pentagon had many weeks to check out the story, there were many witnesses, but they stuck with their lie because they wanted a cute female hero in the newspapers.
    0
  • Lowrider
    They capture our guys and execute them. We capture their guys and give them lawyers. What's wrong with this picture?
    0
  • rcrxmike_2
    Eactly the problem over there......we have to fight by rules. If thier govt woud have caught then would they be court martialed?
    0
  • dheffley
    quote:Originally posted by Lowrider
    They capture our guys and execute them. We capture their guys and give them lawyers. What's wrong with this picture?


    Lowrider,

    You know something? You wouldn't make a very good democrat![:D]
    0
  • RunForest
    quote:Originally posted by Lowrider
    They capture our guys and execute them. We capture their guys and give them lawyers. What's wrong with this picture?


    exactly
    0
  • Cubslover
    quote:Originally posted by woodshermit
    We've heard about England, Tilden, Abu Ghraib. Why does the military keep doing this sort of thing unless they have something to hide? It can't be politics since the military is non-political. Right?



    HA. It's not supposed to be.

    The military in this case is the right hand of a certian individual's ego.
    0
  • Rack Ops
    quote:Originally posted by allen griggs

    The entire raid sounds like something that Francis Marion "The Swamp Fox" would have pulled off during the Revolution.


    That's the worst thing about this whole affair, IMHO. Not only did we lose 4 soldiers, we lost them in a way that is sure to be a propaganda coup for the insurgancy.

    When the insurgancy has a no-s**t spec ops team wrecking havoc inside "secure" zones we have a serious problem.
    0
  • warriorsfan
    quote:Originally posted by rcrxmike_2
    Eactly the problem over there......we have to fight by rules. If thier govt woud have caught then would they be court martialed?


    Rules are what makes us better than them. We didn't sacrafice our morals and rules when we fought the Nazis and the Japanese and lost far more men than in the current war. The Japanese would kill American wounded and execute American POWs, we would give captured Japanese good treatment as prisoners of war. Same with the Germans. That's what made us better than them, we did not sink to their level.


    If you really want American troops to rape and pillage, then this war becomes nothing more than two barbarians fighting it out to see who can be more barbaric. Remember, WE started this war, not the Iraqis. Let's not compound that mistake by tossing out the UCMJ and any semblance of civility.
    0
  • Rack Ops
    quote:Originally posted by warriorsfan
    That's what made us better than them, we did not sink to their level.



    I beg to differ. It was cold, imhuman cruelty that defeated the Germans and Japs. One only has to look at the great firebombing raids on Tokyo and Dresden to see that.

    While captured Axis soldiers were usually treated well, their families in urban areas were being incinerated by the thousands

    The surrender of Japan is directly connected to the (arguably) single greatest acts of inhumanity in the history of the world, the nuclear destruction of two cities.

    Think about it.....for an instant, the ground temperature of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were equal to the surface of the sun. Incredible if you think about it.

    It sure is nice to know we gave German POWs smokes if they wanted 'em....


    Back to the main point....the only way we win this war is to get the point across that we care FAR more about U.S servicemen than the citizens of combatant nations. We don't try to limit "collatoral damage", we seek to increase it. They draw their strength from Allah, so we actively seek to destroy their faith in him.

    It won't happen though......we might as well be pissing in the wind
    0
  • allen griggs
    "the Japanese would kill American wounded and execute American POWs, we would give captured Japanese good treatment as prisoners of war."

    Marines in the Pacific theatre routinely executed Japanese prisoners. I saw a two hour documentary on the Pacific War. They interviewed at least five Marines who said that they themselves had shot Japanese wounded.
    After a battle Marines would patrol the battleground. Any Jap who moved, or groaned, was given a shot to the head.
    0
  • Rack Ops
    quote:Originally posted by allen griggs
    Marines in the Pacific theatre routinely executed Japanese prisoners. I saw a two hour documentary on the Pacific War. They interviewed at least five Marines who said that they themselves had shot Japanese wounded.
    After a battle Marines would patrol the battleground. Any Jap who moved, or groaned, was given a shot to the head.


    Chesty Puller mentioned bayoneting wounded japs in his autobiography.
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity

Didn’t find what you’re looking for?