Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

A Tale of Two Houses

Comments

8 comments

  • kristov
    I have no use for Mr. Gore but speaking only as an idiot engineer I can tell you that geothermal heating and cooling are great...in suitable locations. Site geology, soil types and Hydrology; ground or surface water availability, also play a huge part in deciding to go this route. There are factors like depth (drilling 300 feet is fine but drill 3000 feet? It is not going to happen), volume (you don't want to drain the aquifier), and water quality (if you use an open loop system there will be discharge issues) to consider and just because GW's home site in Crawford is suitable does not mean that Al's Nashville estate would have identical conditions.
    0
  • Colt Super
    I think you missed the point.

    But, I will say that you think like a nganeer.

    D.
    0
  • Ray Boone
    The point seems to be that Mr Gore has fallen in the "Do as I say, Not as I do" trap; the same one that seems to infect just about everyone ever elected of office in washington DC.
    0
  • buschmaster
    bingo
    0
  • Txs
    quote:Originally posted by kimi
    HOUSE # 2:

    The house contains only 4,000 square feet (4 bedrooms) and is nestled on arid high prairie in the American southwest.I'm not sure of textbook definitions for those terms, but that region of Texas is about 700 ft. above sea level and gets around 40in. of rainfall annually.
    0
  • JamesRK
    Yeah, but Algore's house really is ecologically friendly 'cause he bought some kind of eco credits or something.
    0
  • ElMuertoMonkey
    Maybe now the right-wing fist-thumpers will get over themselves and stop being so hostile to the notion that being environmentally friendly is such a horrible thing.
    0
  • JamesRK
    quote:Originally posted by ElMuertoMonkey
    Maybe now the right-wing fist-thumpers will get over themselves and stop being so hostile to the notion that being environmentally friendly is such a horrible thing.

    Monkey, I don't think many people are "hostile to the notion that being environmentally friendly is such a horrible thing."

    I'm hostile to some of the wacko notions some of the environmentally friendly lunatic fringe come up with. Some of these brilliant thinkers now want to put reflectors in space to prevent some of the sun's rays from reaching Earth to reverse "global warming".

    One example of the well thought out measures of the environmentally friendly do-gooders is the plastic/paper bag controversy. There had been a pretty good balance between the pulpwood industry, the paper industry and demand for paper products for well over a century. Without even rudimentary research we jerked a knee and went to plastic to save a tree. All the research necessary would have been go to a tree farmer and ask "how does it work?". Now the tree huggers see the results of knee jerk actions so they want to jerk the other knee.

    If economic forces are allowed to work naturally, the economy will lead people do doing environmentally friendly things. Recycled aluminum and most other metals are cheaper than "new" metals. That's why a lot or metal is recycled. You can't pay a recycler to take paper. Why? Because "new" paper is cheaper than recycled paper. When pulpwood starts to be in short supply, the situation will reverse itself.

    Say I own a house with an average electricity bill of $250.00 per month. Say for an investment of $25,000 to $30,000, I could reduce that bill to $200 per month. I think I'll hold off on that investment. When electricity gets more scarce and the bill goes to $2,500 per month, I'll rethink my position.

    I'm not out to destroy the Earth. I just don't want to jump on every bandwagon which rolls down the road.
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity

Didn’t find what you’re looking for?