Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

ZUMBOMANIA: David E. Petzal?s take

Comments

14 comments

  • Gunners762
    Sorry if its already been posted... Here's a nice field and stream article: Looks like Field and stream is catching some heat. http://fieldandstream.blogs.com/gunnut/2007/02/zumbomania_davi.html
    0
  • Permanently deleted user
    Petzal is just like Zumbo, he just fails to get to the core of why Zumbo got "Zumbo'd".

    It is about the 2nd Amendment NUMBNUTS.

    Zumbo said what he said, meant what he said and never apologized for his failure to support and lack of understanding of the 2nd Amendment.

    Geeez, what a bunch of clueless f*ckers.
    0
  • Gunners762
    quote:Originally posted by lt496

    Petzal is just like Zumbo, he just fails to get to the core of why Zumbo got "Zumbo'd".

    It is about the 2nd Amendment NUMBNUTS.

    Zumbo said what he said, meant what he said and never apologized for his failure to support and lack of understanding of the 2nd Amendment.

    Geeez, what a bunch of clueless f*ckers.


    If you check out the blog you would see this Petzal guy is getting pounded hard.
    0
  • mlincoln
    I think about what this man did and knowing that I am totally perfect, that I have never done anything wrong nor will I ever, I am totally content to ignore his apologies and to make sure that he loses his job. In fact, I feel great about it.
    0
  • Gunners762
    Petzal wrote this back in 1994: Gun owners -- all gun owners -- pay a heavy price for having to defend the availability of these weapons ... and the American public -- and the gun-owning public; especially the gun-owning public -- would be better off without the hardcore military arms, which puts the average sportsman in a real dilemma."

    -- Column by David Petzal, "Endangered Tradition" column in Field and Stream, June 1994.
    0
  • Horse Plains Drifter
    quote:Originally posted by Gunners762
    Petzal wrote this back in 1994: Gun owners -- all gun owners -- pay a heavy price for having to defend the availability of these weapons ... and the American public -- and the gun-owning public; especially the gun-owning public -- would be better off without the hardcore military arms, which puts the average sportsman in a real dilemma."

    -- Column by David Petzal, "Endangered Tradition" column in Field and Stream, June 1994.


    I knew there was a reason I don't subscribe to any of the "Outdoor" rags.
    0
  • Permanently deleted user
    My post on Petzal's blog
    __________________________________

    Sir,

    In reading your comments, it became clear to me that you are a lot like Mr. Zumbo, you just don't get it.

    It isn't that he apologized and "we" failed to forgive him. He said what he said, he meant what he said and he subsequently apologized (using the term loosely) for everything but what the crux of the controversy was.

    The core issue, is his ignorance of Amendment II of the US Constitution.

    It "aint about hunting" Sir. It is about the right of the people to keep and bear arms, not keep and bear "sporting arms".

    I see that you don't seem to get it either.

    You guys seem to be part of the problem, not the solution.

    Please do me a favor and don't purport to represent gun owners, you obviously do not.

    Mr. Jeff XXXX
    Arizona Resident and Peace Officer
    0
  • elkoholic
    I posted to each of his articles"

    Post#1
    Petzal, you are no better then Zumbo. You just don't get it...this has nothing to do with hunting and what is and what is not appropriate to hunt with. This is ALL about our 2nd amendment rights and figuring out who supports the rights of the people. You, like Zumbo, are no friend of the 2nd amendment.

    Post#2
    What is wrong with these writers? How can they be so out of touch with the reality of the assault on our rights? I don't want an apology from this idiot, I just want him to go away and quit dividing gun owners into competing factions.
    0
  • Warpig883
    Who in the hell is David E. Petzal. And why does he think we should be interested or influenced by what he says?
    0
  • JamesRK
    Field & Stream and Outdoor Life are not and never have been "pro-gun". Both have been owned by Time, Inc. for years and are being sold to some outfit in Sweden.

    http://tinyurl.com/3x4o9x

    Of course Misters Zumbo and Petzal are entitled to their opinions just as Mrs. Brady, but it's a bit unreasonable for them to get ill with me for my failure to support them in their efforts to destroy the remnants of freedom in this country.
    0
  • Highball
    Once again, the woods are FULL of people that own guns..and are ANTI-GUN...in the finest traditions of that word..they walk in the shadow of Shumer/Kennedy/Fiendstein/Sen. Dodd....

    Able to remain quietly anti-gun because others do their dirty work FOR them....
    0
  • allen griggs
    Dear Mrs. Brady:
    I would like to treat ol Zumbo like the Shawnee Indians treated white captives. Tie him to the stake, and put a circle of firewood around him ten feet away from him.
    Take about four hours to roast him alive.
    From my cold dead fingers, Yowsuh!
    0
  • Captplaid
    quote:Originally posted by JamesRK
    Field & Stream and Outdoor Life are not and never have been "pro-gun". Both have been owned by Time, Inc. for years and are being sold to some outfit in Sweden.

    http://tinyurl.com/3x4o9x

    Of course Misters Zumbo and Petzal are entitled to their opinions just as Mrs. Brady, but it's a bit unreasonable for them to get ill with me for my failure to support them in their efforts to destroy the remnants of freedom in this country.


    I'm not surprised. Those mags are about as lame as Time. They write for morons. Most of the articles are puff piece reviews of new crap I can't afford and don't need. Never read an article that was critical or called something overpriced crap.

    TimeWarnerCommieCrap.
    0
  • grdad45
    Quote by Captplaid
    "I'm not surprised. Those mags are about as lame as Time. They write for morons. Most of the articles are puff piece reviews of new crap I can't afford and don't need. Never read an article that was critical or called something overpriced crap."

    You don't think they'd accept a gratuity for praising to the max a piece of that c___, do you?[;)]
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity

Didn’t find what you’re looking for?