Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

Go John Glenn! Is this all true?

Comments

16 comments

  • soop
    We haven`t "taken" Iraq yet.
    0
  • HeavyBarrel
    I am preety sure George Carlin said all those things....
    0
  • warriorsfan
    Not true. Whenever ANYTHING like this is attributed to a celebrity, it is ALWAYS false. Please check Snopes.
    0
  • jonk
    One thing I get sick of hearing is "Germany didn't attack us." Let's ignore the Reuben James and similar incidents; Germany declared war on the US on December 11th, 1941. FDR responded by asking the Congress to declare war on Germany. Ergo, Germany declared war on US first.
    0
  • ripley16
    quote:Originally posted by warriorsfan
    Not true. Whenever ANYTHING like this is attributed to a celebrity, it is ALWAYS false. Please check Snopes.



    Glenn was long gone from the Senate in 2004. Never said anything worthwhile. He got his payback from Clinton and left town...the coward. He turned from hero to zero in my book.
    0
  • Colt Super
    +

    D.
    0
  • allen griggs
    Thank you, jonk.
    I have seen this bit of right wing drivel four or five times on this forum alone. They count on the readers having no knowledge of history.
    When Hitler declared war on you, you had better take him seriously.

    "In the years since terrorists attacked us, President Bush
    has liberated two countries"

    What bs. Who in their right mind considers Iraq to be a liberated state?
    Many think that Iraq was better off under Saddam than the tender mercies of the simpleton Bush.
    0
  • Mossbergboogie
    Well we sunk a U boat in the Gulf of Mexico before any troops even reached germany.
    0
  • woodshermit
    There were 39 combat related killings in Iraq in January.
    In the fair city of Detroit there were 35 murders in the
    month of January. That's just one American city,
    about as deadly as the entire war-torn country of Iraq

    Hey, that's great. Apparently no Iraqis died in January.
    0
  • p3skyking
    quote:Originally posted by jonk
    One thing I get sick of hearing is "Germany didn't attack us." Let's ignore the Reuben James and similar incidents; Germany declared war on the US on December 11th, 1941. FDR responded by asking the Congress to declare war on Germany. Ergo, Germany declared war on US first.


    Jonk,
    The neutrality policy of the United States was a sham. You speak of the Reuben James. It was on patrol in the North Atlantic covering the gap in British air coverage over convoys. This was while the US was still neutral. The U-boat promply put a torpedo into Reuben James.
    Hitler had given the Kriegsmarine specific orders to avoid contact with US forces. Roosevelt gave the Navy Department exactly the opposite orders.
    This is why Hitler promply declared war on the US, simply to end the charade.

    Here's a very good history:

    http://www.reuben-james.net/

    This is a particulary interesting paragraph from it:

    Americans were so angered by the attack, that Congress passed a bill allowing armed American merchant ships to sail into combat zones. President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed it. Although the United States was not officially at war with Germany, the German government did not apologize for the sinking. Instead, the Germans issued a statement which read: "Anybody walking along the railroad track at night should not be surprised if he gets run over by an express train." What went unmentioned, was that since October 1939, American warships had been actively pursuing U-Boats. A crewman from the U.S.S. Jouett (DD-396) writes; "On October 1, 1939 we, U.S.S. Jouett, started the first North Atlantic patrol. There were two destroyers and two of the large Coast Guard cutters assigned. I can't remember the Coast Guard ship names at this time. We patrolled, one cutter and one destroyer, an area that extended from Boston, straight east to directly south of Iceland. Then north to the same latitude as the top of the Grand Banks off of Newfoundland and then straight West to the Grand Banks. Then southwest to Boston. This took about 30 very stormy days. This was the beginning of Mr. Roosevelt's Private war, which terminated with Pearl Harbor. We made unprovoked attacks on many German and Italian subs under direct orders from the White House. During this time, we were not legally at war. We had positive kills of at least two U-Boats. You will find no record of this in Navy Records - our logs were purged and all message traffic was removed from the ship by order of the White House about three days after the Pearl Harbor attack."
    0
  • COLT
    ...will one of you mensa IQ folks please tell me just how long a war should last/take?

    ...Also please tell me where one finds victory in cutting and running/leaving? I can't seem to find victory anywhere in that scenario.

    ...of course you cant answer either question so you will just blather away with BS nonsense trying to justify your defeatist attitude...while providing great fodder to the terrorist, telling them just what they want to hear...[xx(]


    ani-texas-flag-1.gif
    0
  • woodshermit
    If it is shown that the reasons stated for starting the war were false and misleading and the reasons for continuing the war change as the war progresses, then, is it not reasonable to bring that war to an end as quickly as possible?
    0
  • warriorsfan
    quote:Originally posted by woodshermit
    There were 39 combat related killings in Iraq in January.
    In the fair city of Detroit there were 35 murders in the
    month of January. That's just one American city,
    about as deadly as the entire war-torn country of Iraq

    Hey, that's great. Apparently no Iraqis died in January.


    39 soldiers died in Iraq in January? Not quite, 83 American soldiers died in Iraq in the month of January. Now you guys are resorting to bald-face LIES in order to make the war look good?
    0
  • warriorsfan
    quote:Originally posted by allen griggs
    What bs. Who in their right mind considers Iraq to be a liberated state?
    Many think that Iraq was better off under Saddam than the tender mercies of the simpleton Bush.


    About 50,000 Iraqis are "liberated" from their bodies each year, does that count? F**k, the body count in Iraq is piling up faster since we "liberated" them than it was under Saddam.
    0
  • ripley16
    quote:Originally posted by allen griggs

    What bs. Who in their right mind considers Iraq to be a liberated state?
    Many think that Iraq was better off under Saddam than the tender mercies of the simpleton Bush.



    Who thinks that? Ted Kennedy? John Kerry? Mrs. Saddam? You read and believe way too much liberal media puke. How many Iraqis did you survey for this particular bit of information?

    You my friend have been snookered by the vast left wing conspiracy...and you don't even know it. Try to think for yourself next time.
    0
  • bigtire
    quote:Originally posted by allen griggs
    Who in their right mind considers Iraq to be a liberated state?
    Many think that Iraq was better off under Saddam than the tender mercies of the simpleton Bush.


    Ask the Kurds in Halabja.












    Oh... nevermind, They were all gassed to death,
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity

Didn’t find what you’re looking for?