Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

Clerics must be taken out!

Comments

17 comments

  • nemesisenforcer
    "firebrand" or similar exciting and aggressive sounding adjective in front of "cleric" is media code-word for "terrorist" and "enemy."
    0
  • p3skyking
    Why stop at Iraq and why stop at Moslem?
    0
  • newtgingrich
    one of the biggest mistakes made in the iraq war was not killing Sadr from day one. now we and the iraqi people are paying dearly for it. i just cant understand why we havent killed him yet.
    0
  • mcaso
    Once again we are fighting a war without the intention to win. We still have not gammed the radio or TV stations that instigate terrorism. Stalin said with controll of the TV he could controll the hearts and minds of the people. That is how important it is. Terrorist are expressly not covered by the Geneuve Convention and can be killed or executed because they are terrorists, same goes for spys. The clerics get away with their acts because NO one stops them. Kill a few and they will get the message. This is a war of wills. And can only be fought on that level.
    0
  • ElMuertoMonkey
    The problem we face is that by not taking them out, we leave a hostile power intact within Iraq.

    If we DO take them out, we leave a void that will be filled by whom?

    Our lack of foresight in taking out Saddam led to Iran's ascendance within the Gulf region. Taking out Al Sadr, as good an idea as that may seem, may lead to some unforeseen and unintended consequences that could very well leave us in a worse position than we're in now. We cannot and should not assume that when they are removed that their places will be taken by someone sympathetic or friendly to our cause.

    Our desire to win must be matched with plans that are feasible and goals that are attainable. The results we get from winning must be as much of our own design as possible. To fight and to win for a result that can only be guessed at is a foolhardy gamble.

    Before we take Al Sadr out, we must ensure that there is someone else to fill his shoes and that individual is willing to do as we say.
    0
  • p3skyking
    quote:Originally posted by ElMuertoMonkey
    The problem we face is that by not taking them out, we leave a hostile power intact within Iraq.

    If we DO take them out, we leave a void that will be filled by whom?

    Our lack of foresight in taking out Saddam led to Iran's ascendance within the Gulf region. Taking out Al Sadr, as good an idea as that may seem, may lead to some unforeseen and unintended consequences that could very well leave us in a worse position than we're in now. We cannot and should not assume that when they are removed that their places will be taken by someone sympathetic or friendly to our cause.

    Our desire to win must be matched with plans that are feasible and goals that are attainable. The results we get from winning must be as much of our own design as possible. To fight and to win for a result that can only be guessed at is a foolhardy gamble.

    Before we take Al Sadr out, we must ensure that there is someone else to fill his shoes and that individual is willing to do as we say.


    Why wait? Could we get someone worse?
    0
  • ElMuertoMonkey
    p3skyking,
    quote:Why wait? Could we get someone worse?
    It is impossible to overestimate just how bad a situation can become.

    Mind you, I don't advocate waiting so much as I advocate thinking it out and acting accordingly.
    0
  • Cameroon
    al-Sadr wants the United States out of Iraq. If he can convince the
    Iraqi people to unite against the invaders i.e. the United States,
    we're really going to have a good time of it. We'll get just what
    President Bush wants, a country with people focused on living together
    without outside interference (United States). Democracy at its finest.
    0
  • kristov
    quote:Originally posted by Cameroon
    al-Sadr wants the United States out of Iraq. If he can convince the
    Iraqi people to unite against the invaders i.e. the United States,
    we're really going to have a good time of it. We'll get just what
    President Bush wants, a country with people focused on living together
    without outside interference (United States). Democracy at its finest.


    Good point. It will only be a matter of time before these extremists begin appealing to nationalists who believe that any government (no matter how bad) run by the people of Iraq is a better government than one forced onto them by the USA. If they read a few Gun Broker posts where our members are demanding that we take their oil as our own because it was paid for with the lives of Americans (we deserve $2 per gallon gasoline) that should do wonders to increase the level of hostility.
    0
  • Horse Plains Drifter
    Yep, that towel head needs to go collect his 72 virgins.
    0
  • Cameroon
    MT357 - Don't understand your reply. Wasn't the reason President Bush
    wanted to "surge" American troops to help the Iraqi government to take
    control of their own country? Now, al-Sadr wants to help by stoping
    sectarian/insurgent violence to show the Iraqi people can govern them-
    selves and you want him dead? If they can govern themselves, what's
    the big deal?
    0
  • allen griggs
    Among the 10 U.S. deaths announced Sunday were three soldiers killed by a roadside bomb while patrolling south of Baghdad; one killed in an attack south of the capital; and two who died of combat wounds sustained north of the capital, in Diyala and Salahuddin provinces. On Saturday, the military said, four U.S. soldiers were killed in an explosion near their vehicle in Diyala.



    South of Baghdad, a truck bomb exploded near the Mahmoudiya General Hospital, killing at least 18 people and wounding 23. The pickup truck loaded with artillery shells blew apart several buildings in a warren of auto repair shops.



    At least 47 people were killed or found dead in violence Sunday, including 17 execution victims dumped in the capital.



    Hours after the Mahmoudiya bombing, five charred bodies littered a courtyard. Most of the dead were mechanics in the repair shops, officials said. The hospital was slightly damaged by shrapnel. Many of the victims were in their homes at the time of the blast, 20 miles south of Baghdad.


    At least 62 bodies - execution victims who were tortured - were found in or near Baqouba last week alone.

    In a rural area just east of Baghdad, three mortar rounds crashed into houses and six people were taken to a hospital in Sadr City with breathing troubles from a possible chemical agent, police said.



    Looks like that surge is really working great.
    Thank you, Commander in Chief Bush.






    .
    0
  • sig232
    Our forces have needed to take the head off the snake from the time we first ran into Al Sadar! He is a trainer of young minds in the dicipline of hate for all other religions. Until these radical muslims are eliminated they will infect the whole of the middle east and insure that we will have to fight WWIII in their land in the not to distant future.

    Of course this will be a much higher level conflict, with nukes most likely and after they have extracted much from the West!
    0
  • Captplaid
    AlSadr has to die.
    0
  • Ray Boone
    AlSadr or anyone else is immaterial. what matters is that the citizens of Iraq agree that the US in NOT an invader, but a temporary support for the government elected by the majority of the people. Since the religious leaders are not into elections, they want the government to fail. As such the religious leaders are at war with the government and de facto with the US.

    the solution will be when the preponderance of the Iraqi citizens believe that they are better off with the elected government than with the theocracy. IF/when that happens there will be no place for the terrorists to hide and the fighting/bombings will soon stop.

    To kill someone even as despicable as some of the leaders, will do nothing but make a martyr of him and dead he will have many converts.
    0
  • mrseatle
    Although he was Orthodox, Mircea the Elder, the Prince of Wallachia, also participated with a contingent in the Crusading army. His principality now constituted the border between Christendom and Islam.

    siege%20of%20nicopolis.jpg

    Siege of Nicopolis shortly before the fall of Constantinople.

    Battle_of_Nicopol_aftermath_Thr_masacreofthecristians_revenge_for_rahova_massacre.jpg

    Dracula's Grandfather brought a small contingent of 10,000 men to this Crusade.

    MirceatheElder.jpg
    0
  • Colt Super
    Sig -

    Sounds like you have a pretty good plan.

    Should it be "III", "3", or "Three" ??

    Doug
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity

Didn’t find what you’re looking for?