Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

WHO'S WORSE ??

TexasVet
Who's worse, Hanoi Jane Fonda OR Hillary "Dogface" Clinton? (no insult meant towards dogs).

IMHO: Hanoi Jane is bad for what she has done --

Hillary Dogface is worse for what's she's done
and what she could do if America is dumb enough to give her the job.

What do you think?
0

Comments

19 comments

Date Votes
  • El Kabong
    quote:Originally posted by TexasVet
    Who's worse, Hanoi Jane Fonda OR Hillary "Dogface" Clinton? (no insult meant towards dogs).

    IMHO: Hanoi Jane is bad for what she has done --

    Hillary Dogface is worse for what's she's done
    and what she could do if America is dumb enough to give her the job.

    What do you think?


    As much as I despise the Klinton Klan, Hanoi Jane did commit treason. Bill and Hillary did not, by the letter of the law.

    Who is the greater threat? Hillary by far...remember almost half the country voted for Kerry, another "hero"[V]. Never underestimate the gullibility and stupidity of the American voter
    0
  • andersk
    ANYBODY , but Hillary!
    0
  • williamprynn
    Dogface. She has a lot of damage left in her. Hanoi jane can only run her pie hole.
    0
  • 11BravoCrunchie
    quote:Originally posted by williamprynn
    Dogface. She has a lot of damage left in her. Hanoi jane can only run her pie hole.


    Dogface.

    Some of you know what it used to say. That's enough for me.
    0
  • WinM70
    quote:Originally posted by williamprynn
    Dogface. She has a lot of damage left in her. Hanoi jane can only run her pie hole.

    I agree.
    0
  • dongizmo
    quote:Originally posted by Zulu7
    quote:Originally posted by williamprynn
    Dogface. She has a lot of damage left in her. Hanoi jane can only run her pie hole.


    Dogface.

    Zulu,
    While I sympathize, you really should edit your post[:0][xx(][;)]
    Don
    0
  • wanted man
    I have to agree that Dogface has the potential to be much more damaging, in more ways, than that other traitorous B$tch![}:)]
    0
  • victorlvlb
    I'm surprised that more of you are not taking Hillary, serious.If the G.O.P. can't find anyone to run against her and win,what would that say about the G.O.P. and thier gene pool?I think Hillary has enough dirt on most of the Dems to ruin them.Just for a good horror story lets say it comes down to Hillary and the mayor of New York.The gov from my state is running, he's pro gun,( has accw lic), but thats all that I know about him so far.In other words I don't know what he has on his agenda, if he would win.
    0
  • TexasVet
    The purpose of this post was to see if most of us agreed that Hillary and Fonda are not well liked.

    I sure take her serious as a candidate. I imagine she's lined up Soros and all kinds of money to help her try and win. I only hope that she's exposed as who she truly is and the voters see through her smokescreen.
    0
  • victorlvlb
    What scares me is all the womans tv channels that think Hillary's the best thing since sliced bread.
    0
  • frankcastle13
    guns and ammo answered this for me, hillary all the way
    0
  • spanielsells
    quote:Originally posted by TexasVet
    Who's worse, Hanoi Jane Fonda OR Hillary "Dogface" Clinton? (no insult meant towards dogs).

    IMHO: Hanoi Jane is bad for what she has done --

    Hillary Dogface is worse for what's she's done
    and what she could do if America is dumb enough to give her the job.

    What do you think?
    Jane isn't running for office and, despite her past, she's still fairly easy on the eyes.

    Hillary, OTOH, has wet dreams of Marxist rule in this country. And, she stands a half-baked chance on getting that. Plus, if I have to look at her on the tube for five years (four in office plus one year prior for candidacy), the only good thing that will come of it is I'll lose the weight I've been wanting to lose due to the fact that I'll always be nauseous.

    So, you be the judge.
    0
  • Permanently deleted user
    Hilda-Beast is worse, due to her position of influence.

    Commie-Fonda is irrelevant, except for being a tiny lightning-rod for lefties, and needing to be hung in the village square for being a traitor.

    Both are ridiculous caricatures of good Americans IMHO. Both are entitled to their dangerous opinions of course, but both are dangerous to America in their own way.
    0
  • dongizmo
    Al long as those sucking on the goverment teat can be rounded up to vote for more freebes, the hillarys will continue to pose a threat to America.
    [V][:(]
    Don
    0
  • Odawgp
    Anyone just not Billary.... i don't think this country is ready for a women president. although many are capable of doing the job, we just arent ready.
    0
  • ElMuertoMonkey
    Hillary - Jane Fonda was not, is not, and will never be in a position to dictate policy.

    Hillary just might and that scares the living hell outta me.
    0
  • chollagardens
    El Kabong said..."As much as I despise the Klinton Klan, Hanoi Jane did commit treason. Bill and Hillary did not, by the letter of the law."

    I think both(and Bill) have commited treason but have not been convicted. Hillery is worse because few people realize it and she may have the power to do it again.
    0
  • dheffley
    Well, it's kind of like saying, which is worse, jumping off a building or jumping off a cliff? One is just as bad as the other, so I'm not going worry about it. Both are on my "don't like" list![^]
    0
  • Colt Super
    What Heff said.

    D.
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity

Didn’t find what you’re looking for?