Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

No Bail For OJ.

Comments

26 comments

  • Jeepgod2002
    Darn, I wanted to see the white Bronco again!!
    0
  • zipperzap
    OJ_Simpson.jpg

    Ha ha ha!
    [:D]
    0
  • elkoholic
    What an idiot.
    0
  • cce1302
    I'm waiting for the "he was framed" and "he's a victim of society" like when he allegedly didn't murder his ex wife.
    0
  • Zebra
    We are OD'd on OJ! He will win his case though!
    0
  • spanielsells
    Maybe they can call in Grisom and all the other CSIs to solve this case.
    0
  • Talented
    Spooky bout Vegas.
    0
  • Permanently deleted user
    Remember, what goes around comes around!!
    0
  • pogybate
    Johnny won't be here with the Gloves this time[^]
    0
  • mateomasfeo
    They stole his caca man...
    0
  • andersk
    Boy, his life has gone down the toilet ... I sure hope they pin this one on him. And I hope he like the Big House!
    0
  • slipgate
    His son owes him a big one for OJ taking the murder charge for him, so maybe his son will take the fall for this one and return the favor.
    0
  • fishkiller41
    quote:Originally posted by slipgate
    His son owes him a big one for OJ taking the murder charge for him, so maybe his son will take the fall for this one and return the favor.

    WHAT???
    U mean OJ's SON did the wakk-job on Nichole & Ron??[:0]



    Jeff
    0
  • slipgate
    quote:Originally posted by fishkiller41
    quote:Originally posted by slipgate
    His son owes him a big one for OJ taking the murder charge for him, so maybe his son will take the fall for this one and return the favor.

    WHAT???
    U mean OJ's SON did the wakk-job on Nichole & Ron??[:0]



    Jeff


    I've seen a lot of evidence that convinces me that there is a good chance this is what happened. There is a book called, "OJ is guilty, but not of murder" that supports this theory.
    0
  • Ray Boone
    Being an experienced football player he'd be immediately signed to the prison team. He'd start as a tight-end, but after a few tackles by Bubba, he'd become a wide-receiver.
    0
  • select-fire
    Mark Fuhrman planted that evidence ...[:o)][:o)]
    0
  • allen griggs
    "On Saturday, the memorabilia dealer who notified police of the incident, Alfred Beardsley, of Burbank, Calif., indicated that he was not interested in pursuing the case.

    "I have no desire to fly back and forth to Las Vegas to prosecute this," he told The Associated Press. "How are they going to have a witness who's on O.J.'s side?"

    Beardsley said he called police only because the items were valuable and if he had not reported them as stolen he would be "held accountable for all the stuff."


    Drudge had a report on this case on his radio show last night.
    He had a reporter on, who said that it is completely untrue that Beardsley had recanted his original accusation, but that this was "made up" by an AP reporterette who is "very sympathetic to OJ."
    Drudge reported that Beardsley is, in fact, ready to testify against OJ and has not recanted.

    As to what goes around, comes around. Drudge said that this memorabilia comes from the civil suit filed by survivors of OJ's murderous rampage. Having lost the suit, OJ was ordered to turn all his property, except for his pension, over to the plaintiffs.
    OJ, not wanting to go by the rules, concealed a lot of his memorabilia, some of which was valuable. He gave this stuff to his agent. Then, there was a payment dispute with the agent, and the agent just kept the stuff, and eventually sold it to some collectors, and the agent kept the money.
    So, OJ has been trying to recover this property for a decade. He didn't go to the police, because had they recovered the memorabilia, it would have been returned to the Brown and Goldman families.
    So, OJ got the bright idea, of recovering "his" property by means of armed robbery.
    0
  • bpost
    quote:Originally posted by Dennis Smith
    quote:reporterette
    [:D]

    O.K. I'm the slowest person here, someone explain it to me...
    OJ was found not guilty in the murder trial...how is it he was found guilty in the civil case and has to pay millions to his wife's survivors?


    Lesser burden of proof;
    A criminal trial requires beyond a reasonable doubt.

    A civil trial requires the preponderance of the evidence.

    Aside from that the prosecution in the criminal trial was way over their heads and the jury was a group of dumb-asses.
    0
  • sig232
    Lets hope this charge sticks![:0]
    0
  • Permanently deleted user
    Putting aside the feelings about his part in the murder of his wife (acquitted) lets concentrate on the rest of the sleazy stuff this guy has been into (drugs at his home, violations of court orders, assaults on other citizens,) ETC,ETC If this was ordinary Joe Blow (forget the fact he is black) Joe blow would have been incarcerated years ago and still been there.

    Its about time this POS who thinks he is above the law gets whats coming to him..[:(!]

    Also in the murder trial there were fears of MOB reprisal if he got convicted. By that there were threats of violence upon the City , riots and such.. And the fact of BIG MONEY maybe had a hand in that case..

    As I stated above. forget the murder case and take this case along with the others at their own merit
    0
  • Colt Super
    +

    D.
    0
  • dheffley
    Think he'll offer a reward to "find the real burglers".[}:)][:D][;)][^]
    0
  • slipgate
    quote:Originally posted by dheffley
    Think he'll offer a reward to "find the real burglers".[}:)][:D][;)][^]


    ROFL!!!
    0
  • gruntled
    quote:Originally posted by dheffley
    Think he'll offer a reward to "find the real burglers".[}:)][:D][;)][^]


    +1[:D]
    0
  • njretcop
    OJ will walk!!! [:(!]
    0
  • tobefree
    I hear he could get 35 years for this, if convicted!!! That would be about enough to satisfy me. He would be 95 when he got out!!! And he still couldn't get a seat at Ruby's..that rocks!!!!
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity