Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

THE TRUE STORY - BLACKWATER FIRED FIRST ??

Comments

22 comments

  • moonshine
    so what they are in a war zone...

    quote:BLACKWATER FIRED FIRST ??
    0
  • BarkingDog
    quote:Originally posted by moonshine
    so what they are in a war zone...

    quote:BLACKWATER FIRED FIRST ??


    yeah but you have to remember (according to EMM) that blackwater guys are just highly paid killers. you also have to remember that serve no purpose except to act like cowboys.
    you also have to remember that enlisted american military troops never break any rules and they never make mistakes. you also have to remember that enlisted american troops work for free, they dont get huge pay checks like the "mercenaries" at blackwater.
    0
  • Laredo Lefty
    I believe about 5% of what the Washington Post prints.
    0
  • nemesisenforcer
    More to the point: who the hell cares? Some people got shot. In a war zone. Truly astounding. My mind is boggling as we speak. They got shot by Americans with guns hired by the US govt. to perform services which sometimes require violence and danger. How does this qualify as news?
    0
  • Fatstrat
    The story as I understood it from earlier reports was that the Iraqi vehicle was in a restricted area and advancing on the Blackwater Group.
    No mention of any shots fired from the vehicle. I'd imagine the primary Blackwater fear was of a car bomb.
    0
  • allen griggs
    Going to be hard to win the hearts and minds of the Iraqi people when Americans are machine gunning innocent civilians.
    0
  • Jgreen
    Why is it that no one will believe the military when the military reports bad news?

    I have a friend who has sued military contractors before, and indeed, even the army. He tells me that the Army, even when 100% in the wrong, is 100% honorable to deal with.
    0
  • dolfan
    If true, this is not good news for BW.
    0
  • 1911a1-fan
    quote:Tarsa said they found no evidence to indicate that the Blackwater guards were provoked or entered into a confrontation. "I did not see anything that indicated they were fired upon," said Tarsa

    he must be real good to asses all that after the fact, maybe when he gets back to the states he can clear up who shot first at the o.k. corral
    0
  • gunnut505
    The question should be; why was another convoy inbound as backup if they weren't needed to help suppress fire?
    I'm certain that nobody was seen during the 30 minute lull in shooting, policing brass or arranging bodies; heck, that would be UNcivil!
    That a drone flew by an hour afterwards is irrelevant, even the "goodwill" payments to traumatized onlookers are spurious; the story is about 17 sheetheads that got waxed doing the wrong thing in an unsecured area occupied temporarily by PSGs doing the right thing.
    0
  • ObiWan
    http://edition.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/meast/10/03/iraq.contractors/index.html

    ""Another incident raised at Tuesday's session of the House Oversight and Governmental Affairs Committee involved a drunken Blackwater employee allegedly shooting and killing a bodyguard to Iraqi Vice President Adel Abdul Mahdi. Prince said the man was fined, fired and flown home from Iraq, and the company later paid $20,000 in compensation to the victim's family.""

    LOL. Now that's funny.
    0
  • mrseatle
    quote:Originally posted by Laredo Lefty
    I believe about 5% of what the Washington Post prints.


    [8D]
    0
  • nemesisenforcer
    quote:Originally posted by allen griggs
    Going to be hard to win the hearts and minds of the Iraqi people when Americans are machine gunning innocent civilians.


    As opposed to when we killed literally millions of Japanese and German civilians with bombing raids?
    0
  • Jgreen
    Did we win their hearts or minds in Germany or Japan?
    0
  • ElMuertoMonkey
    In a war zone you fire when fired upon or are presented with a credible threat - last I checked it is NOT carte blanche to open fire upon civilians when you feel like it.

    The bombings of Japan and Germany? Civilian casualties were, for the most part, collateral damage. For the most part the Allies were seeking to take out Axis war-making potential, not inflict civilian casualties (Dresden and Tokyo are two notable exceptions).

    With Blackwater, this was NOT the case. Had these civilians been shot during the course of a firefight, hey, bad things happen in a war zone. However, as the U.S. Army found "no evidence that Iraqis had fired weapons", this is obviously not the case. This was not collateral damage, this was not self-defense. This was a case of a couple of hopped-up cowboys that panicked and open fired on civlians for no good reason.

    So much for their spec-ops Delta SEAL Green Air Service training... Tell me, if I go through Blackwater super elite black ops wetworks training, can I too lose my cool and open fire on a bunch of people who can't shoot back?
    0
  • Jake_S-83
    Iraqis don't like shooting at us. They like blowing us up. They know what CF vehicles look like and 99% of them know to stay the hell away from them. I don't have much sympathy for someone who knowingly drives toward a convoy and gets lit up. Its a war. Unpleasant things happen.
    0
  • allen griggs
    "Did we win their hearts or minds in Germany or Japan?"

    No.
    Winning the hearts and minds was a big part of the Vietnam War. We didn't win the hearts and minds in Vietnam, either.
    Iraq is looking a lot more like Vietnam than WW2.
    0
  • Highball
    What truly boggles the mind is..who the hell died and made you boys God ?
    Shooting civilians (yawn)..whats on t.v., anyway ?
    PAX AMERICANA !!!

    Those that refuse to learn fron history are doomed to repeat it.

    The REAL pisser is..they drag intelligent people down the same commode WITH them...as their greedy grasp drains the life-blood of a nation.
    0
  • v35
    Somehow, I feel the Blackwater guys had a nose for a bad situation and saw one shaping up. Who fired first Hoyles rules are BS.
    0
  • nemesisenforcer
    quote:Originally posted by allen griggs
    "Did we win their hearts or minds in Germany or Japan?"

    No.
    Winning the hearts and minds was a big part of the Vietnam War. We didn't win the hearts and minds in Vietnam, either.
    Iraq is looking a lot more like Vietnam than WW2.


    spoken like a true defeatist.
    0
  • nemesisenforcer
    quote:Originally posted by v35
    Somehow, I feel the Blackwater guys had a nose for a bad situation and saw one shaping up. Who fired first Hoyles rules are BS.


    Amen. If I'm them or in any remotely similar situation, the LAST thing I'm gonna do is wait for the OTHER guy to fire.

    If this all plays out like the media and the anti-americans and terror apologists on this board want it to, they Blackwater guys will be nothing more than sacrificial lambs.
    0
  • 180A
    Those Blackwater guys are tough.

    You have to be tough in that environment to survive.

    How many civilians that they were guarding have been killed?

    I'll bet the answer is none.
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity