Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

Tiger attack at the San Franciso zoo

Comments

54 comments

  • 11b6r
    There ya have it- PROOF- Guns don't kill people- TIGERS kill people. Expect San Fran to enact a ban on tigers weighing more than 7 pounds, and implement a waiting period to buy kitty litter.
    0
  • helicopter_pilot
    What do you want for Christmas?

    Oh, I don't know. As long as I'm not eaten by a tiger! Heh.

    D'OH!!!


    Of course what the tiger wanted for Christmas was Manburger Helper.

    The tiger was killed. The eulogy stated she was a great humanitarian. (Hey, if vegetarians eat vegetables... *chuff, chuff* Hello? Is this thing on?)

    No, seriously. She was a humanitarian. She only wanted to serve man!

    That guy who was killed was worried. No, really. His friend said, 'What's eating you?'

    THANK YOU! I'll be here all week. Try the veal! And be sure to tip your waitress.
    0
  • MVP
    quote:Originally posted by 11b6r
    There ya have it- PROOF- Guns don't kill people- TIGERS kill people. Expect San Fran to enact a ban on tigers weighing more than 7 pounds, and implement a waiting period to buy kitty litter.

    Just ban Zoos all together.
    0
  • buschmaster
    300 pounds is teeny for a siberian tiger. deep bite marks and claw marks? waah. if it would have been a normal 600-800 lbs, they would have crushed bones for sure and probably all 3 mauled to death.

    it's weird, you see one up close and in person and you see how them things are not to be messed with. but in a picture they just look like a big kitty.
    0
  • He Dog
    quote:Originally posted by MVP
    quote:Originally posted by 11b6r
    There ya have it- PROOF- Guns don't kill people- TIGERS kill people. Expect San Fran to enact a ban on tigers weighing more than 7 pounds, and implement a waiting period to buy kitty litter.

    Just ban Zoos all together.



    That sounds like the same logic as get all guns out of citizen hands. I hope that was sarcasm!
    0
  • MVP
    quote:Originally posted by He Dog
    quote:Originally posted by MVP
    quote:Originally posted by 11b6r
    There ya have it- PROOF- Guns don't kill people- TIGERS kill people. Expect San Fran to enact a ban on tigers weighing more than 7 pounds, and implement a waiting period to buy kitty litter.

    Just ban Zoos all together.



    That sounds like the same logic as get all guns out of citizen hands. I hope that was sarcasm!

    Heavy Sarcasm.
    I was playing along with 11b6r and his sarcasm.
    0
  • He Dog
    Whew, that is what I do for a living.
    0
  • MVP
    I love zoos.

    My biggest dissapointment in a zoo though was San Diego Zoo.

    It seemed like every other pen had the same miniature African deer in it.
    The Monkey exhibit was great though.

    I guess I have been spoiled by the Woodland Park zoo in Seattle and the Point Defiance Zoo in Tacoma.
    2 World Class Zoos.
    0
  • He Dog
    at that time the General Curator at San Diego was building the largest collection of deer in the world. And he was a bird guy, go figger. Woodland Park is indeed a very fine zoo, I have old and dear friends there in reptiles and invertebrates. Have not seen Point Defiance. If you travel, among my favorites are St. Louis (my first zoo employer and one of the top three in the country in my view) and Tennessee Aquarium. It is generally considered that San Diego and Bronx zoo along with Lincoln Park in Chicago are the top three, at least they have the top three budgets, but my picks would be otherwise.
    0
  • Sav99
    I just read a report that said that the tiger mauled the other two, in an attempt to bite them to get the taste of a San Fran Liberal out of his mouth.
    0
  • Colt Super
    "feeding shoot" ??

    What a dolt.

    Doug
    0
  • GuvamintCheese
    Not much you can do once those big cats get ahold of you. ...... Siegfried
    0
  • He Dog
    That would be feeding shute.
    0
  • GuvamintCheese
    quote:Originally posted by He Dog
    That would be feeding shute.
    or chute.
    0
  • He Dog
    Yeah, that too.[:I]
    0
  • buschmaster
    maybe, if the cops would have tried to corral the thing or keep it cornered until they could get a tranquilizer gun, it would have got loose took off and mauled some more people. so I hate to say it, but maybe it's a good thing it turned out the way it did.
    0
  • He Dog
    Actually Most larger zoos have a response team to deal with such escapes and have at least one shooter on duty each day. On Christmas likely the staff on hand was minimal, and likely getting a tranquilizer gun to the scene with enough staff to capture the animal would have been unlikely. With humans already attacked and being attacked, I think any zoo would have chosen people over the tiger. They are almost gone in the wild, but not uncommon in captivity. It is unlikely that many will ever be returned to the wild.
    0
  • slinger
    That tiger was better off in Africa where they should have left it.
    0
  • Colonel Plink
    quote:Originally posted by slinger
    That tiger was better off in Africa where they should have left it.


    Who's gonna be the first to tell slinger about tigers?
    0
  • He Dog
    Siberian tigers don't come from africa. Neither do Sumatran, Indian, or Bornean tigers, so leaving one in Africa is probably not the best plan. This tiger was born in captivity at the Denver zoo. It has never been in the wild, and would have no idea how to make a living.

    Before you get too nostalgic over the wonderfull life in the wild it is missing out on, reflect that Siberian tigers are endangered, and on the verge of extinction because they have been shot.
    0
  • helicopter_pilot
    PAKENHAM-WALSH: A tiger... in Africa?

    AINSWORTH: Hm?

    PAKENHAM-WALSH: A tiger in Africa?!

    AINSWORTH: W-- Ah, well, it, uh,-- it has probably escaped from a zoo. Mhm.

    PAKENHAM-WALSH: Doesn't sound very likely to me.

    AINSWORTH: Stumm. Stumm. Stumm.



    And of course, the YouTube video link. [:D]

    'Don't shoot! Don't shoot! We're not a tiger!' [;)]
    0
  • slinger
    I sure showed my ignorance in a rush there, boys. I was just trying to make a quick point about leaving this beast in the wild. Then I find out it was from Denver. Ha. My neighbor told me it was a Detroit Tiger on steroids.[:D]
    0
  • Colonel Plink
    quote:Originally posted by slinger
    I sure showed my ignorance in a rush there, boys. I was just trying to make a quick point about leaving this beast in the wild. Then I find out it was from Denver. Ha. My neighbor told me it was a Detroit Tiger on steroids.[:D]


    [:D]

    You won't believe what all you can learn here on GunBroker.

    And you shouldn't believe half of what you're told.

    Except about tigers.

    That part is true.
    0
  • Queen of Swords
    I've never been to the San Francisco Zoo so I do not know the layout, but why would it be inconcievable to think that a cat of that size could not leap/swim (yes, they can swim) across a 15 foot moat, or scale a 20 foot fence (unless it is electric)?
    Your average house cat can easilly broad leap or high jump that to their own scale of body size.
    0
  • LaidbackDan
    I guess I should have a shirt made that says
    Here Kitty,Kitty,Kitty!
    for the next time I go there.
    0
  • He Dog
    The mote is not a water mote, but simply a large concrete "ditch" theoretically too deep and wide to jump. Usually the visitor side of the mote is higher than the cat side to add to the difficulty. That exhibit has been holding that cat for over a year, and other cats longer, so why it was able to escape is a head scratcher. The fence is actually stone, not chain link or something easily climbed.
    0
  • helicopter_pilot
    quote:Originally posted by LaidbackDan
    I guess I should have a shirt made that says
    Here Kitty,Kitty,Kitty!
    for the next time I go there.



    Isn't that the shirt Lyle and Eric Menedez were wearing?





    [}:)]
    0
  • helicopter_pilot
    quote:Originally posted by He Dog
    The mote is not a water mote, but simply a large concrete "ditch" theoretically too deep and wide to jump. Usually the visitor side of the mote is higher than the cat side to add to the difficulty. That exhibit has been holding that cat for over a year, and other cats longer, so why it was able to escape is a head scratcher. The fence is actually stone, not chain link or something easily climbed.


    Actually it's very easy to jump over a mote. [:D] [:o)]
    0
  • Spider7115
    I just heard on the news that the men may have been taunting the tiger relentlessly and they think the tiger hunted them down when he got out.
    0
  • buschmaster
    typical monkeys.
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity