Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

effects of a nuclear blast

Comments

23 comments

  • Blackguns
    [xx(][xx(][xx(]
    0
  • reloader44mag
    shoulda killed those 30,000 chickens with one of those
    0
  • tccox
    Damn good info
    ! Who do we use it on first, China or Russia? I think common sense dictates that before we are wiped out, we must retialiate with as much firepower as we can bring to bear. Tom
    0
  • 11b6r
    An interesting book (in paperback) to add to your SHTF library- "Pulling Through" by Dean Ing. Out of print, but you should be able to find a copy for a dollar or so. And for my fellow paranoids- you can still pick up Civil Defense Surplus radiation meters for a few dollars over on Ebay. Use one D cell battery, several different models available. Of course, the primary defense against attack with a nuclear eapon is to be somewhere that allows you to say "Did you hear something?"[:p]
    0
  • cahas
    In service we were taught this-In case of a nuclear bomb attack,hit the ground, head toward the blast{because of your mighty helmet}rifle under you,so the blast won,t blow it away,face in dirt,arms flat to the side.At 18 this sounded bleak,still does.
    0
  • daveald
    in case of a N-blast you may as well try to see if you can lick your own______ and have a little fun.
    0
  • charliemeyer007
    Did we ever solve the deep mine gap? And what was the final lucky male to female ratio? 1 to 30
    0
  • steeltoe1978
    The scary thing is... this is based off of a 1 megaton nuclear blast. That is child's play in this day and age.
    0
  • 11b6r
    Steeltoe- actually, as guidance systems improved, the size (yield) of nukes has DECLINED. Nowadays, a 150 Kiloton weapon is a large one. However, damage is not a direct correlation to weapon yield (200 kt is not twice as destructive as a 100 kt, etc)
    0
  • Captplaid
    Bring it on!


    Oh wait, that was my response to another posting. Well some carp say Biblical prophecy does not indicate the United States of America will exist.

    You know, I find it interesting a carp will predict Armageddon when Jews are still looking for a Messiah. It would seem that the Messiah must come before the end of the world.
    0
  • bobski
    yawn, every human growing up in the cold war era knows all of this by heart....[:I]
    0
  • Txs
    "Sir, we must not allow a mineshaft gap!"
    -Gen. Buck Turgidson

    bradley-clock-talking-strangelove.jpg
    0
  • D1
    quote:Originally posted by Captplaid
    Bring it on!


    Oh wait, that was my response to another posting. Well some carp say Biblical prophecy does not indicate the United States of America will exist.

    You know, I find it interesting a carp will predict Armageddon when Jews are still looking for a Messiah. It would seem that the Messiah must come before the end of the world.




    someone please tell me what the meaning of "carp" is here and in other postings i've seen
    0
  • allen griggs
    Countries around the world spend their national treasure, and get their best and brightest scholars to create these bombs.
    The human race is insane.
    0
  • mcaso
    Who is this R.D. Hoffman and what is the date of this. Over the years there has been a lot of misleading info. "...one multi-warhead nuclear missile can destroy more cities..." The last word I heard about multi-headed nukes was that when the first one of the multi-head goes off it will probably destroy the others(it's brothers). "...especially genetic damage to succeeding generations." Records of birth defects in the two Japaness cities show no more birth defects after the bombings than before.
    0
  • buschmaster
    quote:Originally posted by drjew
    quote:Originally posted by Captplaid
    ... Oh wait, that was my response to another posting. Well some carp say Biblical prophecy does not indicate the United States of America will exist.

    You know, I find it interesting a carp will predict Armageddon when Jews are still looking for a Messiah. It would seem that the Messiah must come before the end of the world.someone please tell me what the meaning of "carp" is here and in other postings i've seen
    I think he's referring to one of these http://forums.gunbroker.com/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=280086
    0
  • bigtire
    I say go ahead and use them in the middle east. Even though it is more humane than they deserve![:(!][:(!][:(!]

    Nerve gas would work much better. Leaves structures intact but kills the people, disipates quickly. Problem is I don't think we have enough in stock to kill every muslim on the face of the planet.[:(]
    0
  • ammo guy
    I suspect this is largely Anti- nuke propaganda. I know for a fact that the statement about the increase of the "fire storm" going from 100 sq miles to 2500 from a one Megaton to a 20 meg. war head it pure bunk. A 20 meg. warhead is only 2-3 times more powerful than a one meg. one. This is why none were ever fielded. I have a copy of the US Military's "Effects of Nuclear Weapons" that was published in the mid -60's. It has the actual details(effects) of the two bombs dropped on Japan as well as the various tests done in the late 40's and early 50's of the Thermo-nuclear tests conducted in the west and pacific. In reality other than the radioactive aspects of the explosion, the EMP and heat the effects, they are not all that different from a standard detonation, just on at larger scale. In military terms most nuke's would be detonated as an air burst so residual radiation would not be a major problem. In the case of a terrorist situation that would change. The major problem would be in the "down wind" zone and the immediate area of the detonation. Sadly there is a great deal of false and misleading info being put out on this subject.
    0
  • FrancF
    quote:Originally posted by Txs
    "Sir, we must not allow a mineshaft gap!"
    -Gen. Buck Turgidson

    bradley-clock-talking-strangelove.jpg


    [:D] I watched Dr. Strangelove not to long ago!
    0
  • select-fire
    The Japanese bombs were Atomic. Today's warheads are hydrogen. Hydrogen are around 100 times more powerfull.Worry about the surface winds being like a hurricane...IF the firestorm don't get you. Go deep.. real real deep.. The atomic drop will be like nothing compared to a Hydrogen Thermonuclear blast.. read below..

    http://www.answers.com/topic/hydrogen-bomb?cat=technology
    0
  • PATBUZZARD
    quote:Originally posted by cahas
    In service we were taught this-In case of a nuclear bomb attack,hit the ground, head toward the blast{because of your mighty helmet}rifle under you,so the blast won,t blow it away,face in dirt,arms flat to the side.

    Don't forget the all important plug your ears so you won't have your ear drums blown out!!
    0
  • mateomasfeo
    I love that story!
    0
  • select-fire
    Comparing an atomic bomb to a H bomb is like shooting a BB gun and a .50 BMG.

    http://www.jaysnet.com/666nuke.html
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity