Power from salt water
0
-
Funny thing bout the headline....I wrote power from salt water...and the headline magically changed to this above....
Weird !0 -
you have to make salt water two words it pick up the last letter in the first word and the first 3 letters in the second word and makes it a bad word. 0 -
Impractical, inefficient, and consumes more energy than it generates.
A very bad idea[:(!][:(!]
0 -
Did'nt some guy here make a calculation and estimated it to give out twice the energy it consumes...
[:)]0 -
If some one did, they were WRONG!!! 0 -
++++++++
D.0 -
One of the articles about the process said it was, at best, about 76% efficient at the current time. That may change in the future, and it's worth the research effort to try, but it is presently a net energy loser. That doesn't make it a bad thing, since nearly all breakthrough type discoveries improve over time, but don't hold your breath for $1 gas to result from this by next weekend. 0 -
Years ago A guy from these parts made a unit thast bomdarded electricity with Rf waves and he did produce a nice flame from it.
Wonder what happened to that?0 -
quote:Originally posted by alledan
Years ago A guy from these parts made a unit thast bomdarded electricity with Rf waves and he did produce a nice flame from it.
Wonder what happened to that?
Old Fool talked to him. See his post above0 -
quote:Originally posted by Old Fool
Impractical, inefficient, and consumes more energy than it generates.A very bad idea[:(!][:(!]
+10 -
+1 0 -
Why + 1 ?.Dont u hope for cheap energy that could push our world into a gigaecconomic superturbo stage...and just think what i could do to our stockportfolios [;)] 0 -
I agree that it won't get far, but that 76% efficiency, if accurate, sounds pretty darn good to me, compared to most energy sources. 0
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Comments
13 comments