Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

Romney Supports Ban on Weapons

Comments

19 comments

  • dolfan
    quote:Originally posted by FrancF
    We also should keep weapons of unusual lethality from being on the street... This is a very scary statement.
    Any firearm can be construed to be or legislated as "unusual lethality".
    0
  • 1911a1-fan
    quote:Originally posted by dolfan
    quote:Originally posted by FrancF
    We also should keep weapons of unusual lethality from being on the street... This is a very scary statement.
    Any firearm can be construed to be or legislated as "unusual lethality".



    yep as long as it kills you twice




    i think we're gonna be hard pressed to find any candidate that is truly pro gun
    0
  • FrancF
    quote:Originally posted by dolfan
    quote:Originally posted by FrancF
    We also should keep weapons of unusual lethality from being on the street... This is a very scary statement.
    Any firearm can be construed to be or legislated as "unusual lethality".



    Thats what got my attention-
    0
  • A J Christ
    Sounds to me like man speaking with forked tongue.
    0
  • Ramtinxxl
    He's a politician--and not to be trusted.
    0
  • medic07
    WTH is "unusual lethality"????

    Lethal means deadly. Dead is dead. Last I checked as an EMT, if a patient is dead, there are no levels to it.

    "Oh look Ron, this one is really dead." "Yeah Bob, but this one is only slightly dead...we can wait to bury him for a week or two."

    All guns are lethal...so are knives...so are baseball bats...and cars
    0
  • Captplaid
    Kiss of Death.

    No, it's not because he is a Mormon.
    0
  • Sperry
    He is setting up a complete ban on semi-auto 50 cal rifles.
    0
  • LesWVa
    Let's break it down..

    "... We also should keep weapons of unusual lethality from being on the street....

    but we should not interfere with the right of law-abiding citizens to own guns either..."


    Can someone tell me which side of his mouth he speaks from?

    I am guessing both.[V]
    0
  • CS8161
    Too much hair spray, it has penetrated his cranium and rendered him an idiot!
    0
  • Civil Rights
    anyone who can get elected in massachusets is NO CONSERVATIVE and most likely isnt really pro-gun.
    romney is okay but he isnt what this country needs.
    huckabee is the only one who looks solid and consistent on gun control.
    no way guiliani
    no way mcain
    0
  • barto
    See the moving lips?
    The SOB is lying.
    [:(!]barto[:(!]
    0
  • Permanently deleted user
    Anyone who isn't a zombie should have known this long ago. His record is clear, moving lips and NRA life-membership aside.
    0
  • ObiWan
    """Mr. Speaker, I rise to restore the right the founding fathers saw as the guarantee of every other right by introducing the Second Amendment Protection Act. This legislation reverses the steady erosion of the right to keep and bear arms by repealing unconstitutional laws that allow power-hungry federal bureaucrats to restrict the rights of law-abiding gun owners."""

    Ron Paul in the US House of Representatives, January 9, 2003.

    Read more here:

    www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul73.html
    0
  • buschmaster
    that, plus the 75% "yes" in the CNN poll the other day showing he's got a decent chance of winning, gives Ron Paul my vote.
    0
  • bobinwis
    Glad to see posting of Romney's views on firearms. Have not seen anything in the papers here or on local TV about his views on the subject. Seems like any one of them could win 'Dancing with the Stars' hands down.

    Is there anyone in the country that is qualified to be President that doesn't have a hidden axe to grind (or bury in your skull)?

    Let's try 4 years without someone in the White House, maybe just Hillary as cleaning lady. We all know that anyone in Congress is more than qualified to lead the pack (means that they know which pocket your money is in).

    Regards, Bob
    0
  • CA sucks
    quote:Is there anyone in the country that is qualified to be President that doesn't have a hidden axe to grind (or bury in your skull)?
    We all know that anyone in Congress is more than qualified to lead the pack (means that they know which pocket your money is in).

    Ron Paul, he gets his money not from rich people, but from 118,000 people averaging about $100 contributions.
    If the rich give them money (as most politicians get money from the rich), they will pander to the rich.
    Ron Paul gets his money from the people, so what does that tell you about who he will be trying to please?
    0
  • Cornflk1
    Thanks for the post; I had never really considered him for my vote, now I definately don't. Think he is full of Sh**, just another politico trying to be all things to all people.[:(]
    0
  • NOTPARS
    One thing I have learned over the years is that if a person's beliefs are grounded in certain principles, the 2nd Amendment guarantees and individual right to keep and bear arms for example, then their exposition of a political position should be clear, concise, and consistent because it is based on those principles. When they hem and haw, it would suggest that maybe their postion is not based upon clear and immutable principles but upon what is politically expedient. And, when it become expedient, perhaps Romney's new found love for the NRA and the 2nd Amendment will get tossed over board.
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity