Romney Supports Ban on Weapons
(CNSNews.com) - Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney was asked about his "retreat" on gun control Sunday, just one of the issues raised in his appearance on NBC's "Meet the Press."
Host Tim Russert asked Romney about his earlier support for strong gun control laws, noting that in his 1994 Senate race againt Ted Kennedy, Romney backed two gun-control measures -- the Brady Bill with its waiting period on gun sales; and the renewal of a 1994 ban on "assault" weapons.
At the time, Romney said he didn't "line up with the NRA." But when he decided to run for president, Romney signed up for a lifetime membership in the National Rifle Association.
Romney on Sunday said that he did support the assault weapons ban. But he hedged on whether he's still for it: "Let me describe it," he said to Russert, as Russert pressed him to say whether he still supports the ban.
"I would have supported the original assault weapon ban," Romney said. "I signed an assault weapon ban as Massachusetts governor because it provided for a relaxation of licensing requirements for gun owners in Massachusetts, which was a big plus. And so both the pro-gun and the anti-gun lobby came together with a bill, and I signed that.
"And if there is determined to be, from time to time, a weapon of such lethality that it poses a grave risk to our law enforcement personnel, that's something I would consider signing. There's nothing of that nature that's being proposed today in Washington." But Romney said he "would look at weapons that pose extraordinary lethality."
Russert tried again: "So the assault ban that expired...because Congress didn't act on it, you would support?"
Romney noted that President Bush said he would have signed the bill if it came to his desk -- "and so would I."
In the next breath, Romney said he was "pleased to have the support of the NRA when I ran for governor. I sought it, I seek it now. I'd love to have their support. I believe in the right of Americans to bear arms."
(The National Rifle Association never endorsed Romney, the Washington Post reported on Monday. Romney's spokesman Kevin Madden told the newspaper, "Mitt Romney as a candidate received a respectable B grade rating from the NRA, and when he was governor he had the support of the NRA and the Gun Owners Action League in relaxing some of the state's burdensome licensing regulations." According to the Post, Madden's Democratic opponent in the 2002 governor's race had an "A" grade from the NRA.)
Romney said he supports background checks on gun buyers "to make sure that the crazies don't buy guns." But he said with today's technology, there's no need for long waiting periods.
"But my position is we should check on the backgrounds of people who are trying to purchase guns. We also should keep weapons of unusual lethality from being on the street. And finally, we should go after people who use guns in the commission of crimes or illegally, but we should not interfere with the right of law-abiding citizens to own guns either for their own personal protection or hunting or any other lawful purpose."
Host Tim Russert asked Romney about his earlier support for strong gun control laws, noting that in his 1994 Senate race againt Ted Kennedy, Romney backed two gun-control measures -- the Brady Bill with its waiting period on gun sales; and the renewal of a 1994 ban on "assault" weapons.
At the time, Romney said he didn't "line up with the NRA." But when he decided to run for president, Romney signed up for a lifetime membership in the National Rifle Association.
Romney on Sunday said that he did support the assault weapons ban. But he hedged on whether he's still for it: "Let me describe it," he said to Russert, as Russert pressed him to say whether he still supports the ban.
"I would have supported the original assault weapon ban," Romney said. "I signed an assault weapon ban as Massachusetts governor because it provided for a relaxation of licensing requirements for gun owners in Massachusetts, which was a big plus. And so both the pro-gun and the anti-gun lobby came together with a bill, and I signed that.
"And if there is determined to be, from time to time, a weapon of such lethality that it poses a grave risk to our law enforcement personnel, that's something I would consider signing. There's nothing of that nature that's being proposed today in Washington." But Romney said he "would look at weapons that pose extraordinary lethality."
Russert tried again: "So the assault ban that expired...because Congress didn't act on it, you would support?"
Romney noted that President Bush said he would have signed the bill if it came to his desk -- "and so would I."
In the next breath, Romney said he was "pleased to have the support of the NRA when I ran for governor. I sought it, I seek it now. I'd love to have their support. I believe in the right of Americans to bear arms."
(The National Rifle Association never endorsed Romney, the Washington Post reported on Monday. Romney's spokesman Kevin Madden told the newspaper, "Mitt Romney as a candidate received a respectable B grade rating from the NRA, and when he was governor he had the support of the NRA and the Gun Owners Action League in relaxing some of the state's burdensome licensing regulations." According to the Post, Madden's Democratic opponent in the 2002 governor's race had an "A" grade from the NRA.)
Romney said he supports background checks on gun buyers "to make sure that the crazies don't buy guns." But he said with today's technology, there's no need for long waiting periods.
"But my position is we should check on the backgrounds of people who are trying to purchase guns. We also should keep weapons of unusual lethality from being on the street. And finally, we should go after people who use guns in the commission of crimes or illegally, but we should not interfere with the right of law-abiding citizens to own guns either for their own personal protection or hunting or any other lawful purpose."
0
-
quote:Originally posted by FrancF
We also should keep weapons of unusual lethality from being on the street... This is a very scary statement.
Any firearm can be construed to be or legislated as "unusual lethality".0 -
quote:Originally posted by dolfan
quote:Originally posted by FrancF
We also should keep weapons of unusual lethality from being on the street... This is a very scary statement.
Any firearm can be construed to be or legislated as "unusual lethality".
yep as long as it kills you twice
i think we're gonna be hard pressed to find any candidate that is truly pro gun0 -
quote:Originally posted by dolfan
quote:Originally posted by FrancF
We also should keep weapons of unusual lethality from being on the street... This is a very scary statement.
Any firearm can be construed to be or legislated as "unusual lethality".
Thats what got my attention-0 -
Sounds to me like man speaking with forked tongue. 0 -
He's a politician--and not to be trusted. 0 -
WTH is "unusual lethality"????
Lethal means deadly. Dead is dead. Last I checked as an EMT, if a patient is dead, there are no levels to it.
"Oh look Ron, this one is really dead." "Yeah Bob, but this one is only slightly dead...we can wait to bury him for a week or two."
All guns are lethal...so are knives...so are baseball bats...and cars0 -
Kiss of Death.
No, it's not because he is a Mormon.0 -
He is setting up a complete ban on semi-auto 50 cal rifles. 0 -
Let's break it down..
"... We also should keep weapons of unusual lethality from being on the street....
but we should not interfere with the right of law-abiding citizens to own guns either..."
Can someone tell me which side of his mouth he speaks from?
I am guessing both.[V]0 -
Too much hair spray, it has penetrated his cranium and rendered him an idiot! 0 -
anyone who can get elected in massachusets is NO CONSERVATIVE and most likely isnt really pro-gun.
romney is okay but he isnt what this country needs.
huckabee is the only one who looks solid and consistent on gun control.
no way guiliani
no way mcain0 -
See the moving lips?
The SOB is lying.
[:(!]barto[:(!]0 -
Anyone who isn't a zombie should have known this long ago. His record is clear, moving lips and NRA life-membership aside. 0 -
"""Mr. Speaker, I rise to restore the right the founding fathers saw as the guarantee of every other right by introducing the Second Amendment Protection Act. This legislation reverses the steady erosion of the right to keep and bear arms by repealing unconstitutional laws that allow power-hungry federal bureaucrats to restrict the rights of law-abiding gun owners."""
Ron Paul in the US House of Representatives, January 9, 2003.
Read more here:
www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul73.html0 -
that, plus the 75% "yes" in the CNN poll the other day showing he's got a decent chance of winning, gives Ron Paul my vote. 0 -
Glad to see posting of Romney's views on firearms. Have not seen anything in the papers here or on local TV about his views on the subject. Seems like any one of them could win 'Dancing with the Stars' hands down.
Is there anyone in the country that is qualified to be President that doesn't have a hidden axe to grind (or bury in your skull)?
Let's try 4 years without someone in the White House, maybe just Hillary as cleaning lady. We all know that anyone in Congress is more than qualified to lead the pack (means that they know which pocket your money is in).
Regards, Bob0 -
quote:Is there anyone in the country that is qualified to be President that doesn't have a hidden axe to grind (or bury in your skull)?
We all know that anyone in Congress is more than qualified to lead the pack (means that they know which pocket your money is in).
Ron Paul, he gets his money not from rich people, but from 118,000 people averaging about $100 contributions.
If the rich give them money (as most politicians get money from the rich), they will pander to the rich.
Ron Paul gets his money from the people, so what does that tell you about who he will be trying to please?0 -
Thanks for the post; I had never really considered him for my vote, now I definately don't. Think he is full of Sh**, just another politico trying to be all things to all people.[:(] 0 -
One thing I have learned over the years is that if a person's beliefs are grounded in certain principles, the 2nd Amendment guarantees and individual right to keep and bear arms for example, then their exposition of a political position should be clear, concise, and consistent because it is based on those principles. When they hem and haw, it would suggest that maybe their postion is not based upon clear and immutable principles but upon what is politically expedient. And, when it become expedient, perhaps Romney's new found love for the NRA and the 2nd Amendment will get tossed over board. 0
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Comments
19 comments