Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

Texas' answer to active shooters

Comments

15 comments

  • Txs
    I didn't spot that one before posting the full text.

    I'm also not with Perry on MANY things he does, but he's on the money with this.
    0
  • garanch
    I think it is crazy that a person with a CHL cannot carry in a public school especially. Where I live we have a police officer on campus at the middle school. That one officer is supposed to be able to cover the whole campus. Over 1000 students. He has told me that he agrees. There are 11 teachers who hold a CHL on that particular campus but they cannot carry in the school. The officer has stated to me "Why can't I rely on these people for help if a situation were to come up".
    As we all know, if someone wanted to come on to the campus and start shooting people, I do not think that they will register with the front office like any visitor is supposed to. I also think that if the "crazies" knew that there was a good chance of some of the teachers being armed, they might think twice before doing something.
    0
  • mrseatle
    hand-gun-shaped-grill.jpg
    handgun-shaped grill,
    0
  • Permanently deleted user
    ...sounds like the intent of the 2nd Amendment to me...
    0
  • Kodiakk
    Hope this happens. It's logical.
    0
  • Horse Plains Drifter
    Wasn't there a post on here a while back that was something about you couldn't even have a handgun in your car in Texas? I mean it was something just unbelieveable for a place like Texas should be. It was something like Kalifornicate would do.
    0
  • JackBwr
    quote:Originally posted by MT357
    Wasn't there a post on here a while back that was something about you couldn't even have a handgun in your car in Texas? I mean it was something just unbelieveable for a place like Texas should be. It was something like Kalifornicate would do.


    That might have been a major metrapolitan area? I don't know. I've always thought of Texas as being the most pro-concealed carry state in the nation.

    Love the sound of that article. I think I'll turn the computer off on that note so I don't have to read something else that pi$$es me off.
    0
  • Warbirds
    quote:vess1 Posted - 05/01/2007 : 11:00:24 PM

    quote:
    Originally posted by MT357

    Wasn't there a post on here a while back that was something about you couldn't even have a handgun in your car in Texas? I mean it was something just unbelieveable for a place like Texas should be. It was something like Kalifornicate would do.




    That might have been a major metrapolitan area? I don't know. I've always thought of Texas as being the most pro-concealed carry state in the nation.

    Love the sound of that article. I think I'll turn the computer off on that note so I don't have to read something else that pi$$es me off.

    I don't think you're correct, TX specifically allows a firearm in your vehicle, and they also honor a large number of other states concealed carry permits.

    They are not "the most pro-concealed carry state in the nation" however. Vermont does not require a permit, they recognize the second amendment. Florida also has "better" concealed carry laws than TX. My definition of better is the florida law-makers have hit the other states so the Florida permit is valid in nearly 40 states these days, and the dozen or so it's not honored, don't issue permits to thier own citizens.

    I would consider Texas probably in the top five or ten, but not number one.
    0
  • Smokeeater 38
    quote:Originally posted by Kodiakk
    Hope this happens. It's logical.


    It needs to be Nation, if not world wide.
    0
  • Kodiakk
    quote:Originally posted by vess1
    quote:Originally posted by MT357
    Wasn't there a post on here a while back that was something about you couldn't even have a handgun in your car in Texas? I mean it was something just unbelieveable for a place like Texas should be. It was something like Kalifornicate would do.


    That might have been a major metrapolitan area? I don't know. I've always thought of Texas as being the most pro-concealed carry state in the nation.

    Love the sound of that article. I think I'll turn the computer off on that note so I don't have to read something else that pi$$es me off.


    Texas had a deal about carring while traveling without a permit. The burden of proof was always on the person. The law just changed to lay the burden of proof on the state instead of the person. In other words they would have to prove you're not traveling.

    Houston and a few other cities decided to arrest people regardless even if it was a no brainer they were traveling and let the courts work it out. This sucks due to you having to go to jail,court, and get a lawyer equaling all kinds of expense of money and reputation. I hope the major citys still arresting travelers for their gun get a big lawsuit or hit very hard some way for screwing over the average joe. This pisses me off if you haven't noticed.
    0
  • bobski
    what if the person who has a ccw goes nuts later on?
    sane today doesnt mean sane tomorrow. this is the MAIN ARGUEMENT the dems have against us. we need to be able to answer that.
    0
  • Wrangler
    quote:Originally posted by Kodiakk
    quote:Originally posted by vess1
    quote:Originally posted by MT357
    Wasn't there a post on here a while back that was something about you couldn't even have a handgun in your car in Texas? I mean it was something just unbelieveable for a place like Texas should be. It was something like Kalifornicate would do.


    That might have been a major metrapolitan area? I don't know. I've always thought of Texas as being the most pro-concealed carry state in the nation.

    Love the sound of that article. I think I'll turn the computer off on that note so I don't have to read something else that pi$$es me off.


    Texas had a deal about carring while traveling without a permit. The burden of proof was always on the person. The law just changed to lay the burden of proof on the state instead of the person. In other words they would have to prove you're not traveling.

    Houston and a few other cities decided to arrest people regardless even if it was a no brainer they were traveling and let the courts work it out. This sucks due to you having to go to jail,court, and get a lawyer equaling all kinds of expense of money and reputation. I hope the major citys still arresting travelers for their gun get a big lawsuit or hit very hard some way for screwing over the average joe. This pisses me off if you haven't noticed.




    It's not just the major cities, my county does it too. If you have any doubts about how they are handling similar situations where you live, then you need to call the District Attorney's office and find out how they handle the cases in your county.
    0
  • dakotashooter2
    quote:what if the person who has a ccw goes nuts later on?

    It is pure paranoia to run around making decisions based on WHAT IF. You CAN NOT prepare 100% for every contingency. The chances of a LAW ABIDING citizen going nuts is probably no more than some nutjob walking into a school armed. FWIW cops and security gaurds are no more imune to "going nut" than the rest of us yet we continue to arm and use them.

    I'm afraid congress is going to take away my 1st and 2nd amendment rights but that doesn't mean I think we should disolve congress (just vote out the bad reps)!
    0
  • tr fox
    quote:Originally posted by bobski
    what if the person who has a ccw goes nuts later on?
    sane today doesnt mean sane tomorrow. this is the MAIN ARGUEMENT the dems have against us. we need to be able to answer that.


    Simple answer. If you are truly going to have a free country, and allow as much freedom to the citizens as you possible can, then you have to accept that sometimes that freedom will be misused and/or deliver unhappy results to us.

    That is one price of freedom since freedom is not free.
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity

Didn’t find what you’re looking for?