Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

Comments

3 comments

Date Votes
  • Permanently deleted user
    quote:Originally posted by meunke
    And here I thought Liberals were totally against 'shredding the constitution.'

    http://www.ispu.us/pages/articles/2914/articleDetailPB.html
    "In the Fight Against Terrorism, Some Rights Must Be Repealed"

    Why do I post this? Because it goes hand in hand with this:
    http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h110-1022


    This type thinking and this type legislation is rapidly becoming more and more accepted.

    The day will come when the Fed takes the big step to banning private ownership, or possession of firearms/demanding turn in under threat of draconian prison sentence/confiscation.

    What are the collective "we", as in American gun owners, going to do about it?

    I don't think we could gain a consensus about it being daytime, or nighttime. We can't even reach a consensus about the absolute right to keep and bear arms. Many think that certain "infringements" are justified and allowable.

    Someday, it will be time to "man up". Unfortunately that will probable mean standing alone and standing on the principals of freedom and rugged individualism.

    While we continue to quibble about the details of each of these unconstitutional steps, the big gov't/one-world crowd continues to spoon feed and/or force them down our collective throats.
    0
  • Horse Plains Drifter
    Articles like that are EXACTLY why we(militia aka people) need up to date military arms.
    0
  • pickenup
    With this statement....
    quote:The framers of the Constitution saw the right to bear and use arms as a check against an unruly government. That state of affairs no longer exists.
    .......any credibility goes right out the window.
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity

Didn’t find what you’re looking for?