Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

Anti-Gunner gets arrested for possessing gun in CA

Comments

9 comments

  • fastcarsgofast
    [:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:p][:p][:p][:p][:p]
    I hate hypocrites.
    0
  • tr fox
    I also hate hypocrits. Kinda like back in the 1960's. There was a black national newspaper editorial writer who was extremely against firearm ownership. Handguns at least. I can't remember his name, (Rowan, yeah. I think it was Carl Rowan. I could be wrong)but he lived in Washington, D.C., one of the most anti-gun cities in the USA. And also one of the cities with the highest rate of gun crime in the USA. Anyway, one night some teenagers invaded his outside swimming pool for an illegal swim. Apparently one of the teenagers came to or even tried Rowan's patio door on his house. At this point Rowan opend the door and threatened the teenager with a .22 handgun. Police were called and Rowan was caught for having the handgun in a city that totally outlaws civilian possession of handguns.

    So for a guy who makes a living writing anti-gun ownership editorials for newspapers all across the USA, one would think that he would have gone to prison like anyone of us would have for having the handgun. But here is the weaseally way he got out of it and the weaseally way the D.C. justice system let him get out of it.

    Rowan said that the handgun belonged to his son who was an F.B.I. agent. So Rowan thought it was legal for him to have it in his house.

    This story was published in the newspapers and I am not making it up or even exageratting.

    What a load of crap.
    0
  • Slow_Hand
    For a lot of holier-than-thou folks, it's all about "Do as I say and not as I do".
    0
  • RunForest
    I guess its the same as Rosie ODonell and Diane Feinstien who have armed body guards.....
    0
  • A J Christ
    quote:Originally posted by tr fox
    I also hate hypocrits. Kinda like back in the 1960's. There was a black national newspaper editorial writer who was extremely against firearm ownership. Handguns at least. I can't remember his name, (Rowan, yeah. I think it was Carl Rowan. I could be wrong)but he lived in Washington, D.C., one of the most anti-gun cities in the USA. And also one of the cities with the highest rate of gun crime in the USA. Anyway, one night some teenagers invaded his outside swimming pool for an illegal swim. Apparently one of the teenagers came to or even tried Rowan's patio door on his house. At this point Rowan opend the door and threatened the teenager with a .22 handgun. Police were called and Rowan was caught for having the handgun in a city that totally outlaws civilian possession of handguns.

    So for a guy who makes a living writing anti-gun ownership editorials for newspapers all across the USA, one would think that he would have gone to prison like anyone of us would have for having the handgun. But here is the weaseally way he got out of it and the weaseally way the D.C. justice system let him get out of it.

    Rowan said that the handgun belonged to his son who was an F.B.I. agent. So Rowan thought it was legal for him to have it in his house.

    This story was published in the newspapers and I am not making it up or even exageratting.

    What a load of crap.

    Yup.
    Remember reading about that, got himself a good liar and got out of being sent to the joint where he shoul dhave gone. More for being a hypocrite than anything else.
    Think your memory of the time frame might be off a little but you got the basic facts right.
    0
  • Laredo Lefty
    Maybe Mr. Sr. should have spent less time on the "No Guns" program and more time being a father and his kid might not have ended up like his old man.
    0
  • dongizmo
    quote:Originally posted by tr fox
    I also hate hypocrits. Kinda like back in the 1960's. There was a black national newspaper editorial writer who was extremely against firearm ownership. Handguns at least. I can't remember his name, (Rowan, yeah. I think it was Carl Rowan. I could be wrong)but he lived in Washington, D.C., one of the most anti-gun cities in the USA. And also one of the cities with the highest rate of gun crime in the USA. Anyway, one night some teenagers invaded his outside swimming pool for an illegal swim. Apparently one of the teenagers came to or even tried Rowan's patio door on his house. At this point Rowan opend the door and threatened the teenager with a .22 handgun. Police were called and Rowan was caught for having the handgun in a city that totally outlaws civilian possession of handguns.

    So for a guy who makes a living writing anti-gun ownership editorials for newspapers all across the USA, one would think that he would have gone to prison like anyone of us would have for having the handgun. But here is the weaseally way he got out of it and the weaseally way the D.C. justice system let him get out of it.

    Rowan said that the handgun belonged to his son who was an F.B.I. agent. So Rowan thought it was legal for him to have it in his house.

    This story was published in the newspapers and I am not making it up or even exageratting.

    What a load of crap.

    He shot the kid.
    quote:Rowan gained public notoriety on June 14, 1988, when he shot a teenage tresspasser, Neil Smith, who was taking a dip in Rowan's swimming pool in Washington, D.C.. Rowan used an unregistered .22 LR pistol. Critics charged hypocrisy, since Rowan was a strict gun control advocate. In a 1981 column, he advocated " a law that says anyone found in possession of a handgun except a legitimate officer of the law goes to jail -- period." In 1985, he called for "A complete and universal federal ban on the sale, manufacture, importation and possession of handguns (except for authorized police and military personnel).
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Rowan
    0
  • tr fox
    quote:Originally posted by dongizmo
    quote:Originally posted by tr fox
    I also hate hypocrits. Kinda like back in the 1960's. There was a black national newspaper editorial writer who was extremely against firearm ownership. Handguns at least. I can't remember his name, (Rowan, yeah. I think it was Carl Rowan. I could be wrong)but he lived in Washington, D.C., one of the most anti-gun cities in the USA. And also one of the cities with the highest rate of gun crime in the USA. Anyway, one night some teenagers invaded his outside swimming pool for an illegal swim. Apparently one of the teenagers came to or even tried Rowan's patio door on his house. At this point Rowan opend the door and threatened the teenager with a .22 handgun. Police were called and Rowan was caught for having the handgun in a city that totally outlaws civilian possession of handguns.

    So for a guy who makes a living writing anti-gun ownership editorials for newspapers all across the USA, one would think that he would have gone to prison like anyone of us would have for having the handgun. But here is the weaseally way he got out of it and the weaseally way the D.C. justice system let him get out of it.

    Rowan said that the handgun belonged to his son who was an F.B.I. agent. So Rowan thought it was legal for him to have it in his house.

    This story was published in the newspapers and I am not making it up or even exageratting.

    What a load of crap.

    He shot the kid.
    quote:Rowan gained public notoriety on June 14, 1988, when he shot a teenage tresspasser, Neil Smith, who was taking a dip in Rowan's swimming pool in Washington, D.C.. Rowan used an unregistered .22 LR pistol. Critics charged hypocrisy, since Rowan was a strict gun control advocate. In a 1981 column, he advocated " a law that says anyone found in possession of a handgun except a legitimate officer of the law goes to jail -- period." In 1985, he called for "A complete and universal federal ban on the sale, manufacture, importation and possession of handguns (except for authorized police and military personnel).
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Rowan


    I believe that he did not shoot the kid. I remember reading the newspaper article soon after it event actually happened and I am sure there was no shooting. Plus, don't forget that Rowan hide behind his son's job (FBI Agent) and played stupid by saying Rowan thought it was OK for him to have the gun in his house since it belong to his FBI son. (if indeed it even did).
    0
  • wipala
    quote:Originally posted by fastcarsgofast
    [:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:p][:p][:p][:p][:p]
    I hate hypocrites.
    It's possible it's his kids gun but who knows
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity

Didn’t find what you’re looking for?