Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

What kind of pantywaist military do we have now?

Comments

34 comments

  • Rack Ops
    What part of "International Airspace" don't you understand?
    0
  • MrOrange
    I beg to differ with your premise.

    Our military isn't pantywaist; they're handcuffed by our weak, beaten-wife mentality political leaders.
    0
  • Odawgp
    quote:Originally posted by Rack Ops
    What part of "International Airspace" don't you understand?


    I could be wrong but isn't an aircraft carrier considered US soil which would make the airspace around it ours?
    0
  • daveald
    Putin has decided that he needs a new cold war with us to boost his own image of strength at home, he knows we won't shoot the planes down because we know there just being a pain in the arze and don't actually intend to do anything. He has people like chavez in Venezuela, and Kim Jong of N/Korea on his side they all take turns rattling there sabers, just enough to keep us on our toes.
    I'm sure we do the same thing to them, look at the idea of putting long range missles in the former soviet states, talk about rattling sabers.
    0
  • Don McManus
    quote:Originally posted by Odawgp
    quote:Originally posted by Rack Ops
    What part of "International Airspace" don't you understand?


    I could be wrong but isn't an aircraft carrier considered US soil which would make the airspace around it ours?

    Only when it is within U.S. Territorial Waters.[:)]
    0
  • tobefree
    quote:Originally posted by MrOrange
    I beg to differ with your premise.

    Our military isn't pantywaist; they're handcuffed by our weak, beaten-wife mentality political leaders.





    Nicely put....
    0
  • Colonel Plink
    I can tell a bunch of you have never served in the military.

    I've seen it from the hangar deck of an American Aircraft Carrier. We never even went to General Quarters.

    It's simply not that big a damn thang.

    Of all the replies to this thread, daveald's comes closest to the truth.
    0
  • KSUmarksman
    Jesus H. Christ prangle!

    I'm glad that US and Russian military personnel are a heck of a lot more cool headed than your are, or we'd be in a nuclear wasteland by now.

    Flyovers in international waters are very common, the planes were tracked and escorted by US fighters every inch of the way once they got close enough to be a threat, the Russians know that a hostile move would mean getting shot down and war, our guys know that an unprovoked hostile move would mean war. Calm the f*** down already
    0
  • Colonel Plink
    Okay.

    Now KSUmarksman is the closest to the right answer[:D]
    0
  • 46270
    just think if they would have downed a russian aircraft.
    I dont think the aircraft was as close as everyone thinks
    the Skipper aint about the let his boat be undefended.
    I am not navy, But I spent 23 yrs in the Air Force
    I know that the ship has cap flying all the time.
    it was on radar along time before it got close.
    if the skipper said the word, we would be at a shooting
    war right now. so the skipper knew what was going on.
    0
  • p3skyking
    One of my duties on the plane was photographer when we rigged Pact and Chicom shipping. Overflys are very common at sea. We just can't open the bombbay doors or flush the honeybucket over them.
    0
  • Old-Colts
    quote:Originally posted by 46270
    just think if they would have downed a russian aircraft.
    I dont think the aircraft was as close as everyone thinks
    the Skipper aint about the let his boat be undefended.
    I am not navy, But I spent 23 yrs in the Air Force
    I know that the ship has cap flying all the time.
    it was on radar along time before it got close.
    if the skipper said the word, we would be at a shooting
    war right now. so the skipper knew what was going on.Actually, it depends on the state of alert, which depends on where you are (threat area) and what has been detected by the various sensors! It can range from sitting in your flight suit in the Ready Room, to sitting in your aircraft on the catapult, to sitting in your aircraft with the engines turning and ready to go to full power and launch, to doing as you say - in the air and on station. I've been through all of them, especially when we steamed between Hawaii and the Philippines in the early 70's.
    0
  • 11BravoCrunchie
    Dangle
    Strangle
    Mangle

    These are some things that rhyme with Prangle.
    0
  • FrancF
    quote:What kind of pantywaist military do we have now?
    You gotta ask?[:D][:o)][:I][;)]
    Gear_051104_MX8-1.jpg
    0
  • DancesWithSheep
    With such a splendid assortment of berets and complimenting camouflage uniforms, how can you possibly suggest our military is pantywaist? Some HumVees have only front air conditioning and one DVD player!
    0
  • FrancF
    quote:Originally posted by FrancF
    quote:What kind of pantywaist military do we have now?
    You gotta ask?[:D][:o)][:I][;)]
    Gear_051104_MX8-1.jpg


    U.N. Eco friendly plastic for the battle field[?][:D]
    0
  • KSUmarksman
    quote:Originally posted by FrancF
    quote:What kind of pantywaist military do we have now?
    You gotta ask?[:D][:o)][:I][;)]
    Gear_051104_MX8-1.jpg


    ensign, set, phasers, on, gay [:D]
    0
  • bobski
    any plane can fly over any u.s. military ship in any ocean.......but the bomb bay doors must be closed and they cant be locking on. its why we always intercept and escort them, just to make sure they behave.[;)]for you history buffs, just to show you how long this game has been played, heres the first F-14 intercept of a russian bear. my old sqd, VF-2. yes, im a pack rat.....[8D]
    143-4377_IMG.jpg

    143-4378_IMG.jpg

    as you can see, it became a routine cat and mouse game that still goes on today. no big deal.
    143-4381_IMG.jpg
    0
  • 11b6r
    Notice the position of the 23 mm cannon in the tail position on the Bear? Guns up, not aimed.
    0
  • bobski
    exactly.[;)]
    0
  • DancesWithSheep
    quote:Originally posted by 11b6r
    Notice the position of the 23 mm cannon in the tail position on the Bear? Guns up, not aimed.

    If it was a B-52 over North Korea it wouldn't matter. Splash one B-52.
    0
  • twin60s
    the kind that defends your right to bash it 24/7. why dont you stop complaining and go overseas and look for i.e.d.'s with your face.
    0
  • DancesWithSheep
    quote:Originally posted by twin60s
    the kind that defends your right to bash it 24/7. why dont you stop complaining and go overseas and look for i.e.d.'s with your face.

    Heavy flow day, Alice?
    0
  • victorlvlb
    Seems like nothings changed since 1962,(CVA 61 West Pact),and we did the same to the russian ships.
    0
  • mrseatle
    cartoon1775.jpg
    0
  • bobski
    [?][?][?]
    0
  • mrseatle
    Now faith is being sure of what we hope for and certain of what we do not see. This is what the ancients were commended for.
    0
  • PATBUZZARD
    The US military has generally been a cross section of the USA... Take that however you will. Personally I think that the military gets some of the best and brightest, but that's just my 2 cents.
    0
  • mrseatle
    quote:Originally posted by PATBUZZARD
    The US military has generally been a cross section of the USA...

    Yes, but... We were Here First. [}:)]

    reg_crest.gif

    It's still not too late to Join The Army of Arkadian Reparations.
    0
  • ElMuertoMonkey
    quote:Why are Russian bombers allowed to fly over one of aircraft carriers.Because they aren't a threat.

    We don't pitch a fit every time a seagull poops near one of our ships; it's the same thing. If one of those lumbering Cold War-era bombers got close, it's because our Navy let them.
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity