how many would support
that on all ballots
NONE OF THE ABOVE
the rules are simple if none of the above wins the peoples that lost can NEVER run for office again (even for dog catcher)
would this put some fear in to the azz wipes who DONT do what the people want
NONE OF THE ABOVE
the rules are simple if none of the above wins the peoples that lost can NEVER run for office again (even for dog catcher)
would this put some fear in to the azz wipes who DONT do what the people want
0
-
+1 0 -
[:)] 0 -
Never work, look how many went for juan mcpain..... 0 -
Sounds like a good starting point.[:)] 0 -
[:)][:)][:)][:)][:o)][:o)][:o)][:o)] 0 -
+1 0 -
Oh yeah!! 0 -
I would support it if it stated that the incumbent remained in office until another election could be held, and that election had to be held within 90 days, and the original candidates could not rerun for the office in question until someone else had been elected to it first. I say this because it would put and end to voting against a candidate, and there are some folks who would learn and change, so I wouldn't want to bar them for life. 0 -
I'd go for that in a second! 0 -
sounds sound[:D] 0 -
That would get my vote
in many cases.
mijelo0 -
i would support this 0 -
I'm sure we will get the leaders we deserve[}:)] 0
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Comments
13 comments