Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

ANOTHER INCONVENIENT TRUTH

Comments

8 comments

  • A J Christ
    Says a lot about our news media doesn't it?
    0
  • woodshermit
    What is the breakdown between combat fatalities and death from accident, disease, etc. Your statistics have no real meaning without this information. Also, there are thousands of maimed and disabled military personnel as a result of Iraq and Afghanistan. You state that the media would have us believe that minorities are being killed at a disproportionate rate. I don't recall reading or hearing that statement being made by any journalist of consequence. What we do hear is that children of privilege often do not serve while the working class provides the bodies.

    Is it your point that the 3,000 plus fatalities (you ignore the 20,000 plus wounded) is really no big deal?

    As to your question regarding why the MSM doesn't print statistics like this: What good are they and what does it mean? Most of the MSM are toadies for the rich and powerful.
    0
  • kristov
    ANOTHER INCONVENIENT TRUTH:
    The number of US combat deaths in Vietnam in 2007: 0, 2006: 0, 2005: 0, 2004: 0, 2003: 0, 2002: 0, 2001: 0, 2000: 0.....

    Notice the trend since we came to our senses and left Vietnam? The biased media also did a wonderful job of ignoring the massive protests here in the streets of America when it was announced that we were leaving Southeast Asia, the marches deamnding that we go back to finish the job, as well as the tens of thousands of US troops who had to physically forced onto outbound aircraft as they screamed "We have to stay to finish the job we started" and "President Nixon, don't pull us out now, we are too close to victory"!
    0
  • jma2006
    rqx3eq.jpg
    0
  • dakotashooter2
    I agree that those numbers don't have as much meaning without some specifics on what types of deaths were involved.

    However, I do think it indicates something. The public tend to think there are NO military deaths when we are not at war. That is a false assumption.We lose many military personel each year during training exersises, on duty accidents and other related causes. I for one consider those meaningless deaths. Those are the real tragedy. At least in wartime some value (though many may debate that)can be attributed to a death. If a certain percentage of our soldiers are going to die I'd rather see it happen on the battlefield, where it has meaning, than on base. Of course the true tragedy isn't even the deaths but the wounded and injured if the opponents of the war and news media had a clue they would be emphasizing the number of injured instead of the number of dead.
    0
  • Rack Ops
    Your message would be better received if you would actually tell the truth....

    US Military Deaths 2005: 1942
    US Military Deaths 2006: 1858

    http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/RL32492.pdf
    0
  • Permanently deleted user
    ANOTHER TRUTH: The US military has been in IRAQ longer than they were in WWII..Longer than Korea, And approaching the VietNam mark..
    0
  • lpaalp
    "These figures indicate that many of our Media & Politicians will pick and choose. They present only those 'facts' which support their
    agenda-driven reporting. Why do so many of them march in lock-step to
    twist the truth."

    "Our Mainstream Print and TV media, and many Politicians like to
    slant;..."

    These are excellent points. Not sure I can support the conclusions, but these are excellent points.
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity