Institution of new Thirty Rule.
[:D] Thirty reads without comment and I dump it.[:D]
See, Thomas - how's that for 'efficiency in bandwidth?'
Dumped three already this morning.
[:D]
See, Thomas - how's that for 'efficiency in bandwidth?'
Dumped three already this morning.
[:D]
0
-
Sounds good. If I get that many reads and no comment I usually dump them too.
Mike0 -
I don't have to, anywhere else but here, but I work too hard on some of them
to waste my time posting here much anymore. ie. Today 30 Viet Nam firebase
photos, taken while there, and the last 30 of my wife's grandfather's photos
taken down on the Tex/Mex border/1914&1915. Elsewhere, I usually have
about 3-5 comments per/20-30 read.
LOL ... it's just a matter of time economics/just don't have the time, anymore
I suppose if I had a bad case of [:D]crotch rot[:D] to complain about, I wouldn't
have to whine or worry. LOL
[:D][:D][:D]0 -
Looks like your read count is up now. 0 -
I am sorry but I did not get the memo where your post were so important. Will try to do better. Don 0 -
Some of us have to do some work during the day........... 0 -
I just figured I would get rid of mine because nothing I post is of any significance anyway!![:D]
Mike0 -
quote:dcon12:
I am sorry but I did not get the memo where your post were so important. Will try to do better. Don
I post in the Peanut Grower's Monthly Journal - sorry you missed it, Don.
[:D]0 -
quote:Originally posted by zipperzap
quote:dcon12:
I am sorry but I did not get the memo where your post were so important. Will try to do better. Don
I post in the Peanut Grower's Monthly Journal - sorry you missed it, Don.
[:D]
What is a peanut? Is that someone who really enjoys urinating? Don0 -
Institution of new Thirty Rule. zipperzap 7 1785 01/11/2008 4:14:15 PM
by: zipperzap
PS ... let's see, 3 per 30 .... 1785 divided by 30 = 59.5 .... WHERE are my 178.5 replies?
See ....? LOL
[:D][:D][:D]0 -
As I see it alot of people open a thread, to see what its all about
and find they have no interest or no coment for it. I do the same
thing![:D] As for the bandwidth,good for you![:D]0 -
quote:SG_Niner:
As I see it alot of people open a thread, to see what its all about
and find they have no interest or no coment for it.
As for the bandwidth,good for you!
I agree 100%.
I agree 100%.
It's no biggie, but I've been getting e-mail lately from other
forum friends - who are here and elsewhere - asking why I
don't post 'the good stuff' (whatever that is) here anymore -
asking me if I'm 'mad' at GB ... and I'm not. I've just noticed
there seems to be no/little interest here and more interest
out there.
I dunno why and I don't really care to dwell on it ... it's just an
interesting phenomenon they've/I've noticed. I read GB most
every morning, when I'm here, and still get a kick out of some
it's whacked out 'inmates' and rants - especially the 'night
crawlers.'
I just figured that this would be an economical way to answer a
bunch of inquiring e-mails ... I'm way behind on my 'net social
obligations,' too!
[:D]0 -
quote:Originally posted by zipperzap
[I dunno why and I don't really care to dwell on it
BS. Don0 -
[:D] 0
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Comments
13 comments