Global Warming test
0
-
8/10 0 -
10/10
These "tests" are so stupid as to be laughable. Here's one of the "facts" it cites
"Over 17,000 scientists have signed the Global Warming Petition to express their view that "there is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gasses is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere and disruption of the Earth's climate." The Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine"
Hilarious0 -
quote:Originally posted by Rack Ops
10/10
These "tests" are so stupid as to be laughable. Here's one of the "facts" it cites
"Over 17,000 scientists have signed the Global Warming Petition to express their view that "there is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gasses is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere and disruption of the Earth's climate." The Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine"
Hilarious
what's so laughable? That statement is true. Over half of published scientists don't think that the evidence supports the proposition that global warming, if it exists at all, is a man-made phenomenon.0 -
quote:Originally posted by nemesisenforcer
what's so laughable? That statement is true. Over half of published scientists don't think that the evidence supports the proposition that global warming, if it exists at all, is a man-made phenomenon.
I was going to bed. Now I think I'll stay up for a bit and wait on the citation.0 -
quote:Originally posted by Rack Ops
quote:Originally posted by nemesisenforcer
what's so laughable? That statement is true. Over half of published scientists don't think that the evidence supports the proposition that global warming, if it exists at all, is a man-made phenomenon.
I was going to bed. Now I think I'll stay up for a bit and wait on the citation.
OK.
http://www.oism.org/pproject/s33p357.htm
That's the actual petition, signatory names and credentials and all.
here's one report on the "less than half of published scientists" remark I made:
http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.Blogs&ContentRecord_id=B35C36A3-802A-23AD-46EC-6880767E7966
you can google the rest for yourself.0 -
Regarding the petition: You do realize that the "Oregon Petition" was exposed as a fraud years ago, right?
Regarding the "half of all published scientists" claim: It was based on a survey conducted by a Dr. Klaus-Martin Schulte. I was unable to find out any un-biased information about his survey, so I sent him an email asking about his findings.
Here is his reply:
quote:
Dear Mr. York - I have submitted a paper for peer-review, but I have not sought publicity for it. However, through those who were consulted during the drafting, a somewhat inaccurate account of it has leaked out.
Sincerely yours,
Klaus-Martin Schulte
You can google the rest for yourself0 -
8/10 0
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Comments
7 comments