Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

Planting food plots or a plant or two for deer ...

Comments

14 comments

  • Radar
    Not realy crazy, crazy is where you continue to plant a veg. garden every year only to have deer eat everything. That would be me !
    0
  • Odawgp
    I believe most states have laws against baiting on public lands.

    I know with all the greenies DOW officers running around here I would not want to be caught planting anything.
    0
  • wartiger
    It being public land, I don't know legalities of food plots or planting a food source. My advice is to contact the local "possum police", aka, Game and Fish, and ask. If it's ok, try this stuff called "Throw and Grow". No land or soil prep, just throw the seed mix on the ground and watch it grow. I've used it on a small 60 acre tract in middle Georgia and the deer love it.
    0
  • andersk
    This stuff called "Throw and Grow" sounds exactly like what I have in mind. I'll have to check out the legalities.
    0
  • callktulu
    I don't know about other states, but in GA, growing a plant that deer might eat is NOT baiting, and is perfectly legal. Throwing a non-living plant (such as corn, acorns, nuts, etc.) IS illegal, and considered baiting.

    Alive = OK
    harvested = illegal (baiting)
    0
  • diver-rig
    quote:Originally posted by callktulu
    I don't know about other states, but in GA, growing a plant that deer might eat is NOT baiting, and is perfectly legal. Throwing a non-living plant (such as corn, acorns, nuts, etc.) IS illegal, and considered baiting.

    Alive = OK
    harvested = illegal (baiting)


    Same in Iowa and Minnesota
    0
  • andersk
    Now that sounds more like it!
    0
  • zr700
    I say go for it![;)] Its illegal in Pa to Bait, but 2 years ago they decided to allow a few counties that had high deer counts to bait.[:0][V] The rest of us that see a few deer a year are not allowed to![B)] BS... we all buy a hunting tag in the same state, if they can do it so can I![}:)] Whats next different bag limits for buck in different counties?
    0
  • FWAddit
    "Whats next different bag limits in different counties?"

    You mean you don't already have that in PA? Wisconsin is divided into dozens of Deer Management Units so that game biologists can recommend harvest quotas to maintain desirable deer population levels in different parts of the state. In overpopulated units, hunters can buy extra tags for antlerless deer. In recent years, some units have had so many deer that hunters are required to shoot an antlerless deer first, to earn the right to shoot a buck. Frustrating for hunters who see a buck first and have to hold their fire, but there's logic behind the rule.

    In my home state of Arkansas, years ago, it was legal in the southeastern counties to hunt deer with dogs. In the northwest, not legal. This actually had less to do with conservation, more with cultural patterns. Down in the flatlands people hunted like southern gentry; we hillbillies in the Ozarks hunted like--well, hillbillies.

    Game departments need to consider many factors in setting seasons and limits, and it seems reasonable to count social and ecological conditions at the local level among those factors.
    0
  • He Dog
    quote:we all buy a hunting tag in the same state, if they can do it so can I! Whats next different bag limits in different counties?


    New Mexico also has managment areas with differing numbers of permits deawn for different areas depending upon size and deer populations. That is the same as different bag limits for different counties and (if it works) is sound management. You have no reasonable expectation that regulations will be the same in all areas, because the managed resource is not the same in all areas. You can however hunt in those areas that allow baiting.
    0
  • zr700
    quote:Originally posted by FWAddit
    "Whats next different bag limits in different counties?"

    You mean you don't already have that in PA? Wisconsin is divided into dozens of Deer Management Units so that game biologists can recommend harvest quotas to maintain desirable deer population levels in different parts of the state. In overpopulated units, hunters can buy extra tags for antlerless deer. In recent years, some units have had so many deer that hunters are required to shoot an antlerless deer first, to earn the right to shoot a buck. Frustrating for hunters who see a buck first and have to hold their fire, but there's logic behind the rule.

    In my home state of Arkansas, years ago, it was legal in the southeastern counties to hunt deer with dogs. In the northwest, not legal. This actually had less to do with conservation, more with cultural patterns. Down in the flatlands people hunted like southern gentry; we hillbillies in the Ozarks hunted like--well, hillbillies.

    Game departments need to consider many factors in setting seasons and limits, and it seems reasonable to count social and ecological conditions at the local level among those factors.






    Yes we have the same thing with doe tags and different units. We don't have the earn a buck program
    0
  • andersk
    How about if I just move a weed to the right spot? [:p]
    0
  • Jacob2008
    My view of baiting is that liquid stuff that makes deer come to it, and the "deer crack" or whatever, acorns, corn, etc.

    If you just wanna feed their little tummies closer to your stand, so be it [:D][:D][:D][:D][:D]
    0
  • andersk
    How about feeding their big tummies!
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity