Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

Rommy on the 2nd

46270
I still dont trust him.
0

Comments

21 comments

Date Votes
  • Sav99
    Just heard it too. I thought for a moment that perhaps he would say it.
    He hesitated, but just couldn't seem to say the words.
    0
  • dongizmo
    quote:Originally posted by 46270
    I still dont trust him.


    Uhh, did you read this?
    http://forums.gunbroker.com/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=284357
    What was there to trust to begin with?
    0
  • ladams
    He is a great big NO from me.... too bad too because he has a decent stance on a lot of other issues.....
    0
  • Rack Ops
    I missed it....what did he say?
    0
  • ladams
    Signed a permanent AWB in Mass. SAid guns were only needed for protection and hunting, and that "assault weapons" were only used to kill people.
    0
  • Rack Ops
    He just said that in the debate?
    0
  • sarge_3ad
    Romney reminds me of a crooked used car salesman.
    0
  • dheffley
    quote:Originally posted by 46270
    I still dont trust him.



    Do you trust him more than Hillery or Obama? How about McCain or Giuliani?

    The man I trusted was Hunter, but he dropped out. The next was Paul and Thompson, but one dropped out and the other wants to be an isolationist.

    I'm getting backed into a real corner on who I can support.
    0
  • 46270
    no, but he flip flop.
    we know he signed a ban in his state, but Huckabee ask him straight.
    He would look you in the eye and take your ar.
    0
  • 46270
    no, but he flip flop.
    we know he signed a ban in his state, but Huckabee ask him straight.
    He would look you in the eye and take your ar.
    0
  • sarge_3ad
    Hef, where do you get that Paul is a isolationist. Could you show me a link or something. Just curious.
    0
  • dheffley
    quote:Originally posted by sarge_3ad
    Hef, where do you get that Paul is a isolationist. Could you show me a link or something. Just curious.


    Listening to his speeches about when we should be involved in military action. His stance was, unless they attack us here, we shouldn't go into any other country looking for them or trying to stop them, and we shouldn't put pressure on any other government to find and stop terrorist, that the other governments should do as they wish.

    I don't want to wait for another attack, I want a President who will actively preempt an attack off of our soil. I also want a President who will hold other governments accountable for what they allow to go on inside their borders. Lastly, I don't want a President who sits back only watching the domestic front while everyone else globalizes into a world without our consideration, input or influence. He thinks if we try to influence anyone else, we are intruding in their sovereignty.

    If I have a neighbor who's going to start raising pigs, I'm going to try to influence them not to do it next to my property line, not just wait until the pig pen is under my kitchen window.

    He's a great constitutionalist, but a poor world leader. America can't survive the "Great Wall of America" mentality.
    0
  • zipperzap
    Some of you are going to have a rude awakening when it's only him vs. the hildabeast - and that's the way it's gunna shake out - like it or not.
    [8D]
    0
  • Rack Ops
    quote:Originally posted by zipperzap
    Some of you are going to have a rude awakening when it's only him vs. the hildabeast - and that's the way it's gunna shake out - like it or not.
    [8D]



    I think the "rude awakening" will be had by the GOP.

    Romney will be crushed by whatever canidate the Dems run
    0
  • dongizmo
    quote:Originally posted by Rack Ops
    quote:Originally posted by zipperzap
    Some of you are going to have a rude awakening when it's only him vs. the hildabeast - and that's the way it's gunna shake out - like it or not.
    [8D]



    I think the "rude awakening" will be had by the GOP.

    Romney will be crushed by whatever canidate the Dems run

    Yep, I am starting to think a democrat is what it will take to get the zumbo's out to the polls and vote for the man who will stick to the constitution.
    0
  • zipperzap
    Yep
    0
  • jhimco
    If he wins the Republican primary then I guess I will not be voting this time around.
    0
  • Mossbergboogie
    If you dont vote you can not complain.
    0
  • tysonagreen
    Its been said before, but South Park had it dead on. It always come down to a choice between a giant douche and a turd sandwich. If it comes down to it I guess I would vote for him but I'd rather not have a giant douche or a turd sandwich for president (you can decide who is what).
    0
  • Wulfmann
    Frankly I do not like any after Thompson departed.

    I would vote for the Huckstir for only one reason. IMO, the 2nd amendment trumps everything else good or bad as without that we have nothing.

    I am less concerned with economic prosperity than I am in having real freedom and without the 2nd we will not have that.
    So, that leave the Huck or Paul who will virtually destroy the country single handedly, IMO.
    He is not an isolationist he is a run for the hills.

    Fortunately every time he opens his mouth he sounds like he will have his 2nd amendment rights revoke on a section 8.

    Wulfmann
    0
  • kimi
    quote:Originally posted by Rack Ops
    quote:Originally posted by zipperzap
    Some of you are going to have a rude awakening when it's only him vs. the hildabeast - and that's the way it's gunna shake out - like it or not.
    [8D]



    I think the "rude awakening" will be had by the GOP.

    Romney will be crushed by whatever canidate the Dems run


    Americans lose either way.
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity