NRA Nobody does it better
Got real tired of the NRA good or bad thread so I am starting my own. Please don't post long requotes make the thread hard to read.
I can't imagine a Pro-gun organization that would do a better job.
I rarely disagree with the NRA's activities.
Would like to join an NRA sanctioned club.
I agree that some weapons should be restricted, controlled, banned whatever you want to call it. ie. RPG's, Gernades, Morters, 20mm and up rifles, machine guns, etc. 50 bmg is very close the the line for me.
I don't really know what the second ammendment means but I would like to keep the guns I have and would like to get more. Don't try to tell me what the second ammendment means, I can read as well or better than you and I have read a lot of the supporting and historical presedents.
If you think the govenment feels threatened by gun owners you are confused. NO Major Power Can Be Over Turned Solely By The Use Of Small Arms. Civil Disobediance, General Strike By Majority Of Service Providers, Power, Transportation, Water Works, Trash Collection that is real power. Hell if you just pull the plug on cable and satelite TV you could bring the government to its knees. Small Arms are a weak offensive tool.
Politicians support gun control because in their districts it brings them more votes than support for gun ownership. Politicians are followers, ie. poles and the numbers. Leaders are people with original thoughts and prefers not to worry about the numbers.
George W. Bush actually was a leader, a somewhat misguided leader.
John McCain is a leader, follows his own drummer, does that scare you?
The NRA "Leadership" are Politicians and that is what they are susposed to be, we want them to listen to us and do what we want them to do.
In our government the Congressmen should be Politicians and should represent the views of the people in their district. The Senators should be our concience and good judgement and temper the rashness of the House of Rep. The executive "Pres." should, needs to be a Leader.
I can't imagine a Pro-gun organization that would do a better job.
I rarely disagree with the NRA's activities.
Would like to join an NRA sanctioned club.
I agree that some weapons should be restricted, controlled, banned whatever you want to call it. ie. RPG's, Gernades, Morters, 20mm and up rifles, machine guns, etc. 50 bmg is very close the the line for me.
I don't really know what the second ammendment means but I would like to keep the guns I have and would like to get more. Don't try to tell me what the second ammendment means, I can read as well or better than you and I have read a lot of the supporting and historical presedents.
If you think the govenment feels threatened by gun owners you are confused. NO Major Power Can Be Over Turned Solely By The Use Of Small Arms. Civil Disobediance, General Strike By Majority Of Service Providers, Power, Transportation, Water Works, Trash Collection that is real power. Hell if you just pull the plug on cable and satelite TV you could bring the government to its knees. Small Arms are a weak offensive tool.
Politicians support gun control because in their districts it brings them more votes than support for gun ownership. Politicians are followers, ie. poles and the numbers. Leaders are people with original thoughts and prefers not to worry about the numbers.
George W. Bush actually was a leader, a somewhat misguided leader.
John McCain is a leader, follows his own drummer, does that scare you?
The NRA "Leadership" are Politicians and that is what they are susposed to be, we want them to listen to us and do what we want them to do.
In our government the Congressmen should be Politicians and should represent the views of the people in their district. The Senators should be our concience and good judgement and temper the rashness of the House of Rep. The executive "Pres." should, needs to be a Leader.
0
-
quote:I don't really know what the second ammendment means
No kidding?!?
Pickenup, good call on the "first" response.[8D]0
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Comments
31 comments