Bush- that pro gun president

salzo

January 25, 2008 05:43

http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB120096108857304967-lMyQjAxMDI4MDIwNTkyNjUxWj.html

0

• 

  pickenup

  January 25, 2008 07:27

  The Bush administration has shown their true colors.
  This comes as NO surprise to "some" of us.

  0
• 

  gunphreak

  January 25, 2008 12:13

  The traitors have revealed themselves!!!!
  
  

  0
• 

  Highball

  January 25, 2008 12:37

  Most amusing.
  Remember when so many called bush 'pro-second Amendment'..? Ain't it hell to be right..when the government is wrong ?
  
  
  quote:More ominously, if Mr. Clement's balancing test were adopted by the High Court, it would be an open invitation to judges nationwide to essentially legislate what is or isn't proper regulation. The beauty of Judge Silberman's standard is that it carved out wide Constitutional protections for arms -- such as "most" hand guns and hunting rifles -- that Americans now own and that might reasonably have been anticipated by the Founders. The Bush Justice Department is instead inviting the Supreme Court to uphold an individual right to bear arms in principle but then allow politicians and judges to gut it in practice.

  0
• 

  chaoslodge

  January 25, 2008 13:45

  What did anyone expect. This falls right into line with the rest of this administrations behavior. They have betrayed thier entire base. I feel angry for all of them and I did not come anywhere near voting for this charlatan puppet.
  
  Welcome back from wonderland. I am looking forward to having real debates with conservatives now that the koolaid is wearing off.

  0
• 

  gunphreak

  January 27, 2008 06:28

  quote:Originally posted by Highball
  Most amusing.
  Remember when so many called bush 'pro-second Amendment'..? Ain't it hell to be right..when the government is wrong ?
  
  
  quote:More ominously, if Mr. Clement's balancing test were adopted by the High Court, it would be an open invitation to judges nationwide to essentially legislate what is or isn't proper regulation. The beauty of Judge Silberman's standard is that it carved out wide Constitutional protections for arms -- such as "most" hand guns and hunting rifles -- that Americans now own and that might reasonably have been anticipated by the Founders. The Bush Justice Department is instead inviting the Supreme Court to uphold an individual right to bear arms in principle but then allow politicians and judges to gut it in practice.
  
  
  
  
  I assume that doesn't include me, right???

  0
• 

  Highball

  January 27, 2008 16:22

  Gunphreak;
  Don't remember having that argument with you...no.
  
  You have always seemed to be intelligent.[:D]..unlike many that were convinced that bush was the new Saviour...

  0
• 

  gunphreak

  January 27, 2008 17:59

  I knew the instance that Bush claimed he supported the Klinton Viktim Disarmament Edikt that he was an enemy.

  0

Please sign in to leave a comment.