Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

1 gun a month?

Comments

12 comments

  • jma2006
    I really think you should not limit yourself so much.
    0
  • Rack Ops
    Given enough time, folks will come up with the most asinine laws
    0
  • tr fox
    Yeah, the old "one gun a month" is just yet another goofey liberal plan. Makes about as much sense as limiting check forgers to one ball point pen per month, or a driver with a DUI conviction to one tank full of gas per month, and on and on. Course the difference is that the gun owner/buyer has not already been convicted of breaking the laws, such as check forging, DUI, etc.

    Funny thing about a gun owners having numerous guns and lots of ammo, they can only accurately shoot one gun and one round at a time. Liberals just don't understand the world they live in. They seem to believe that if they put enough words on paper (laws) they can somehow create paradise on earth.
    0
  • chaoslodge
    I really wish that they would hurry up and make this an entitlement program. I can only afford about one gun a year.

    Just think, we could arm the inner cities to the teeth, have the police stand aside and let them all work things out for themselves. With 24/7 live coverage of course.
    0
  • 45long
    It would be a real money maker on PayPerView *LOL*
    0
  • l3to
    quote:Originally posted by chaoslodge
    I really wish that they would hurry up and make this an entitlement program. I can only afford about one gun a year.

    Just think, we could arm the inner cities to the teeth, have the police stand aside and let them all work things out for themselves. With 24/7 live coverage of course.


    Well since cops can be as much of the problem as the citizens I think that suggestion is flawed
    0
  • bgjohn
    I agree, it should government subsidized and be MANDATORY!
    JM
    0
  • NOTPARS
    At the high school where I teach, my liberal colleagues are all very anti-gun/anti-2nd Amendment. One was brow-beating me about this 1 gun a month idea, I got tired of it, and then I told him I agreed. His mouth dropped and he said he couldn't believe it. I told him "Sure, I agree, it should be mandated that everyone must buy at least one gun month and since I don't believe in unfunded mandates......" ha ha. He turned and angrily left my room.
    0
  • tr fox
    One gun a month makes about as little sense as trying to cut down on rich, famous people and their frequent drug and alcohol driving arrests by limiting them to buying only one car a month.

    Course that is not a good comparsion because I am using admitted dangerous and illegal behavior (DUI) with lawful, peaceful gun buyers. So maybe it would be OK to limit known criminals to only one gun purchase a month. I would also like to ask the liberals that like this one gun a month idea exactly where the benefit comes from by enacting yet another gun law on the lawful public. Yeah, enacting laws are a pretty seririous action because it is yet another layer of burden on already lawful people (the only people who obey laws to begin with) so an honest and reasonable society should want to enact as few laws as possible.

    So I ask again to the liberals. Where is the benefit to be gained from having a one gun a month law? I myself, if I were to go nuts and start shooting people, I can only accurately shoot one gun at a time, regardless of whether I have a trunk-load of guns with me or not.

    BTW, I am not shy about mentioning that occassionally a peaceful, lawful gun owner WILL probably go nuts and start shooting people. If I ever go crazy I hope another gun owner is ready, will and able (by having CCW) to shoot me down like a dog before I hurt anyone. But I have two comments about all that. One is that such a threat is all the more reason that any peaceful, responsible citizens that wants to CCW should be allowed to almost anywhere. The other comment is that, like it or not, citizens from time to time in all walks of life (cops, politicians, teachers, gun owners, physicians, Semi-truck drivers, etc.) will go nuts and harm innocent people. As long as we offer all citizens a free and open society there is no way to completely prevent this.

    We have to accept the fact that freedom is not free. With freedom comes, not only responsibility, but some problems that we would rather not have. That is part of a free life.

    (Disclaimer: I have lived 65 years without "going nuts" and I strongly believe that no innocent living thing should ever be harmed unless there is no other choice)
    0
  • Permanently deleted user
    quote:Originally posted by tr fox
    As long as we offer all citizens a free and open society there is no way to completely prevent this.



    TR,

    Even if we weren't "free and open" there is no REAL way to stop the criminal or would be criminal from doing, what they have made their mind up to do.

    Difference being, in a free society, we enable ourselves to PRESERVE life, liberty and family. WE take on responsibility for OURSELVES in a free society, unlike the "unfree" societies.

    I'm sure that is what you ment anyway. [:)]
    0
  • tr fox
    quote:Originally posted by freemind
    quote:Originally posted by tr fox
    As long as we offer all citizens a free and open society there is no way to completely prevent this.



    TR,

    Even if we weren't "free and open" there is no REAL way to stop the criminal or would be criminal from doing, what they have made their mind up to do.

    Difference being, in a free society, we enable ourselves to PRESERVE life, liberty and family. WE take on responsibility for OURSELVES in a free society, unlike the "unfree" societies.

    I'm sure that is what you ment anyway. [:)]


    You are partly right freemind. But actually many planned crimes can be and are stopped before they are able to happen. You have read about it in the news I'm sure. Either from law enforcement luckily being in the right place at the right time, or from the results of an ongoing police investigation, or from an informent, etc. It is not fair to say that only the armed, indivdual citizens can protect them and theirs from harm. Often times society is able and does protect the citizens.

    Now this does not mean I believe that lawful citizens should not have full rights to have the means to protect them and theirs and should have the law on their side, etc.
    0
  • crash2usaf
    Wait a cotton picking minute, is someone suggesting that guns may actually teach/preach/instill in people what it is to be responsible? I thought they were dangerous objects that we mere citizens aren't responsible enough to handle unlike government trained ocifers
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity

Didn’t find what you’re looking for?