To The Canary Hineys:
lt496, kimi, Don McManus, Marc1301, MT357, quackmajik, et al: Do you maintain these alter egos just to stir up stuff?
Generally, we don't allow people to have multiple accounts.
Thanks.
Generally, we don't allow people to have multiple accounts.
Thanks.
0
-
quote:Originally posted by nunn
lt496, kimi, Don McManus, Marc1301, MT357, quackmajik, et al: Do you maintain these alter egos just to stir up stuff?
Generally, we don't allow people to have multiple accounts.
Thanks.
nunn,
The "Order of The Brethren of The Canary Ass" was formed as a 'tongue-in-cheek' grouping in response to a certain frustrated posters comment about certain people being all talk and having nothing to back it up.
The Brethren took off from there and the main idea behind it, is for the Brethren to hold fast to and point out examples of the founding principals of individualism, without which America goes down the toilet.
The 'alter-ego' thing sprang up in direct, 'tongue-in-cheek' response to our adoption of the name "canary ass". Although the names and the group were formed as a quasi-joke, the alter-ego's' are not designed to hide the identity of any member, nor to stir up any problems.
Nothing posted using our alternate "canary ass" name is one bit different than that which is regularly posted under our regular screen names.
A roster is available, clearly identifying each 'canary ass' and in fact, most of us have adopted our Brethren number, or identity, in our regular screen name sig-lines to further clarify and identify.
It seems that I remember a group called something akin to the "society of suave sophisticated smoking jacket club", being in existence previously. This is not an attempt to excuse any bad behavior on the part of the 'canary ass' group David, but merely to illustrate that occasionally, like minded individuals band together for fun and other reasons.
The Brethren quite frankly, is fun for those of us involved, yet we have a serious mission underlaying the enjoyable nature of the 'canary ass brethren', that being to band together to present the consistent message of adherence to the US Constitution and its Bill of Rights, personal liberty, limited government and the founding principals of individualism.
We contrast our postions against the insidious mindset and philosophy of Collectivism, which is steadily destroying the Republic.
Education is the goal, since without an understanding of and a clarification of these issues, most will never realize how the Republic was meant to be and how it can be saved, rather than slowly destroyed.
No deliberate attempt to stir up anything going on here David, just a group of "Brethren", formed to be an illustration of a group of freedom minded, liberty espousing individuals.0 -
quote:Originally posted by nunn
lt496, kimi, Don McManus, Marc1301, MT357, quackmajik, et al: Do you maintain these alter egos just to stir up stuff?
Generally, we don't allow people to have multiple accounts.
Thanks.
Just FYI David, quackmajic and/or quickmajic will have to speak for him/herself.
He/she is not affiliated with the Brethren, nor would he/she be welcome, due to the collectivist ideals he/she seems to hold to.
The Brethren do not attempt to hide who they really are. There is no desire to, nor need.0 -
Mr. Nunn:
lt496 has stated the situation precisely.
I think you will find that there is little stirring done while posting under the nom de plumes.0 -
quote:Originally posted by lt496
quote:Originally posted by nunn
lt496, kimi, Don McManus, Marc1301, MT357, quackmajik, et al: Do you maintain these alter egos just to stir up stuff?
Generally, we don't allow people to have multiple accounts.
Thanks.
nunn,
The "Order of The Brethren of The Canary Ass" was formed as a 'tongue-in-cheek' grouping in response to a certain frustrated posters comment about certain people being all talk and having nothing to back it up.
The Brethren took off from there and the main idea behind it, is for the Brethren to hold fast to and point out examples of the founding principals of individualism, without which America goes down the toilet.
The 'alter-ego' thing sprang up in direct, 'tongue-in-cheek' response to our adoption of the name "canary ass". Although the names and the group were formed as a quasi-joke, the alter-ego's' are not designed to hide the identity of any member, nor to stir up any problems.
Nothing posted using our alternate "canary ass" name is one bit different than that which is regularly posted under our regular screen names.
A roster is available, clearly identifying each 'canary ass' and in fact, most of us have adopted our Brethren number, or identity, in our regular screen name sig-lines to further clarify and identify.
It seems that I remember a group called something akin to the "society of suave sophisticated smoking jacket club", being in existence previously. This is not an attempt to excuse any bad behavior on the part of the 'canary ass' group David, but merely to illustrate that occasionally, like minded individuals band together for fun and other reasons.
The Brethren quite frankly, is fun for those of us involved, yet we have a serious mission underlaying the enjoyable nature of the 'canary ass brethren', that being to band together to present the consistent message of adherence to the US Constitution and its Bill of Rights, personal liberty, limited government and the founding principals of individualism.
We contrast our postions against the insidious mindset and philosophy of Collectivism, which is steadily destroying the Republic.
Education is the goal, since without an understanding of and a clarification of these issues, most will never realize how the Republic was meant to be and how it can be saved, rather than slowly destroyed.
No deliberate attempt to stir up anything going on here David, just a group of "Brethren", formed to be an illustration of a group of freedom minded, liberty espousing individuals.
I believe, and hope, you are referring to me. But what a huge laugh it is for me to observe, and for you and yours to brag about, what you have "done" in response to my charge that all of you are all talk and no action.
Yes, look what your reaction was. You form a strictly online children's club who continue in your already established tradition of being Keyboard Kommandos. I.E. doing nothing but "talking" big, just like the loud and common barroom drunks.
As evidence of your childish need for attention, let me mention that your group could not be happy keeping your childish club strictly here in your club cave, but had to don your costumes and parade around the Politics Forum to be sure you got at least some attention.
In regards to your ignorant claim that there should be absolutely no gun control laws what-so-ever, I again ask the question of how, in your desire to follow "personal responsibility" how can you be sure you are not selling your unwanted firearm to a person with a long, violent criminal record unless there is some way for you to be told this?
Just how can you be sure? Simple and direct question. None of you need crank up your pre-programmed propaganda machine and start blattering about the constitution, or of having the potential victims all highly trained, armed and always on watch for people like that violent felon you might just have "legally" armed.
Just how can you be sure you are selling to a lawful citizen? Simple short question deserves a simple short answer.0 -
tr:
Is was in response to a post by tallcharlie in politics.
Carly Simon sang a song once......
Speaking for myself, tr, we disagree frequently, but I do believe that you are honest in your convictions, and sincere in your efforts.
Disagreeing in a confrontational manner is typically not my style, so I would only request that on this thread, you recuse yourself.
There are and will be ample threads through which we can explore the legitimate discussion regarding how much control we as a society will allow government to have over us. This is not one of those threads.
Thanks,
Don0 -
quote:Originally posted by tr fox
Just how can you be sure you are selling to a lawful citizen? Simple short question deserves a simple short answer.
You cant be. Just as you cant be sure that you are selling a baseball bat, knife, fertilizer, or a multiple of other items that can, and are often (some more so than guns), used to commit crimes.
You have many times stated that you support background checks on firearms. Would you also support background checks on baseball bats, golf clubs, knives, fertilizer, etc? If not, care to explain why such items should not require a background check to purchase??0 -
Also I am unaware of Kimi being a member. 0 -
quote:Originally posted by nunn
MT357: Do you maintain these alter egos just to stir up stuff?
Generally, we don't allow people to have multiple accounts.
Thanks.
No sir, Mr. Nunn.0 -
quote:Originally posted by lt496
The "Order of The Brethren of The Canary Ass" was formed as a 'tongue-in-cheek' grouping in response to a certain frustrated posters comment about certain people being all talk and having nothing to back it up.
quote:Originally posted by tr fox
I believe, and hope, you are referring to me.
You think/hope it was something YOU said????
ROFLMAO
As much as you WANT to take credit.
It had NOTHING to do with YOU.
Get over yourself.0 -
I am Canary ass no. 1 ;
I am Highball.
I stir up stuff WHEREVER I go. Just my kinder, gentler, nature.
The good Captain Lt496 has said it far better then I ;
It is your call, Peace Officer Nunn.0 -
quote:Originally posted by nunn
Generally, we don't allow people to have multiple accounts.
The brotherhood was formed because of a statement made by a moderator
posting under another identity. (multiple accounts?)
Admittedly, he did come back and identify himself, and stated that it was caused by not being able to access his usual identity.
MANY people here have multiple accounts. Where in the rules does it say they can't?0 -
quote:Just how can you be sure you are selling to a lawful citizen? Simple short question deserves a simple short answer.
Again you show your abject failure to grasp the following simple concept........
It ain't about the person, or the firearm, it is about behavior and actions of an individual, actually committed, e.g., the oft repeated commission of a "bad act".
This, rather than government deciding which of America's Citizens shall be debarred the use, possession and access to arms.
In a free society, it is the actions of an "individual" which are measured and if criminal, sanctioned.
Government simply has no constitutional authority, enumerated, specific, or delegated, to perform these issues of "regulation" and "prohibition".
As to your seeming wish that you were involved in the causation of the Brethren, well, this merely points to your lack of reading comprehension and your cognitive abilities.0 -
I don't reckon you guys are doing any harm. 0 -
I think they are doing many some good by helping educate(in a civilized fashion)that the 2nd doesn't permit "regulation/control" on who or who shouldn't be allowed to excercise the right to bear arms.
Many have been "groomed" by the propagandist media/government that the more regulation the better. Not only with our 2A rights but in every aspect of our lives. We are being herded into thinking we cann't think on our own.
I too was falling into this trap some time ago to the point I almost joined the NRA until I did some research of my own. The "without the NRA you would have no gun rights at all" propaganda is very powerfull but extremely misleading. I actually had the application filled out and ready to mail on the kitchen counter. Luckily it dawned on me why so much regulation/outright bans on firearms if the NRA is so great? Did my homework and found out the NRA was plea barganing with the lawmakers and actually helping write laws in favor of regulation/control.
In the trash it went. I've never been a member of the NRA an never will be.
We need more independently thinking induviduals. However we also need to band together to let others know they're not alone. Group support is a powerfull thing but not to a "collectivist" extreme.
Just my 2c worth.0 -
Impressive.
A tiny pebble, thrown in the pond....0 -
quote:Originally posted by nunn
I don't reckon you guys are doing any harm.
thank you Sir..much appreciated..lets carry on Gents..no.10 [^]0 -
I've got a few things going on, so I am going to let my post cook a little longer. But trust me, I will be back. 0 -
quote:Originally posted by tr fox
I've got a few things going on, so I am going to let my post cook a little longer. But trust me, I will be back.
OH THE SUSPENSE! [:I]0 -
Yea,.......I just signed on, and I can hardly wait![xx(] 0 -
Well, I can at least take a second to throw this post at all of you. It ought to leave you simmering with anger (hehehehe) until I can come back and give you better.
All you guys in your Candy Ass club behavior as if you all were WWII combat vets who, together, fought like hell sometimes hand-to-hand and pounded American's enemies into submission.
But in reality, all any of you have ever visibly done here on GB.com is to have pounded your keyboard into submission.
Oh, yeah almost forgot one more thing you are good at. Operating as a gang, Attacking/Counter attacking a lone operator such as myself.0 -
quote:Originally posted by tr fox
I've got a few things going on, so I am going to let my post cook a little longer. But trust me, I will be back.
Take your time Mr. Fox. I don't want you to miss out on some real life issues just to belittle the constitution.[;)]0 -
TR,.......that is not true.
I have been quite friendly towards you on general topics, and you also in return.
I just will never buy your constant willingness to compromise away our 2nd. Amendment rights further.0 -
originally posted by trfox:
Well, I can at least take a second to throw this post at all of you. It ought to leave you simmering with anger (hehehehe) until I can come back and give you better.
All you guys in your Candy Ass club behavior as if you all were WWII combat vets who, together, fought like hell sometimes hand-to-hand and pounded American's enemies into submission.
But in reality, all any of you have ever visibly done here on GB.com is to have pounded your keyboard into submission.
Oh, yeah almost forgot one more thing you are good at. Operating as a gang, Attacking/Counter attacking a lone operator such as myself.
tr:
1) I consider anyone who disregards the Constitution as an enemy of America. What do you call them? Friend?
2) You are not a 'lone operator'. There are many other Collectivists on here to keep you company.0 -
Tr Fox,,,,,,,In reply to your question regarding how do we know who we are selling our "unwanted gun" to. Well Americans were doing it for years before Sara Brady and your other heros were on the scene and it worked quite well. In fact up to about 25 years ago it was done all the time. I recall in "72" a friend of mine bought a 20 gauge coach gun for his dad for Christmas through Montgomery Wards. He was 13 at the time. That was common. What changed was societies reluctence to punish the criminal element. A mass murderer stands as much chance of dying of old age on death row than actually being put to death. That doeasn't help. And the way street gangs are delt with is rediculous. And useless. Your gun laws have stop nothing or help anything. In fact, they have contributed greatly to making matters worse. As for the politics room, It will be a cold day in hell before I enter that day care center again. I don't need to get attention from a bunch childish ill informed leftists maskerading as adults. 0 -
quote:But in reality, all any of you have ever visibly done here on GB.com is to have pounded your keyboard into submission.
What a load!
WHAT, exactly, have YOU done HERE Tr?
All you seem to manage is proping up YOUR opinion as fact.
WE point people to the ACTUAL documents that are the founding CONTRACT of this country.
We attept to educate. You attempt to spread propoganda.
There is a stark difference.0 -
. 0 -
quote:Originally posted by MT357
Easy MT.
While Fox might side with them, he is not TOTALLY responsible. That is just a tad unfair.0 -
Yep, reckon so. 0 -
You have come a LONG way from the firebreathing flamethrower you were just a few short months ago, No.7.
A thinking man is far more dangerous then one that merely reacts to stimulous.
Tr keeps niggling at us because he knows that he is wrong..and too proud to admit it. The conflict inside must be terrific.0 -
I would not be part of such an emmaculate bunch of naive whimps club. Nor would those silly people out there who want to be a majik. The cannary bums are a silly, simple, and dumb bunch of gun waveing taser carrying sillybirds. 0
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Comments
81 comments