Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

Chief G. Not Guilty

ChrisStreett
Washington Examiner reports SEAL Chief Gallagher found not guilty.
0

Comments

16 comments

Date Votes
  • SCOUT5
    Good
    0
  • allen griggs
    I am glad he was found not guilty.
    0
  • wpageabc
    It is good. The gov and country put these soldiers in harms way.

    The exposure to war with no rules and no uniformed enemy and expect perfections unattainable.

    Returning vets, 22 commit suicide daily. Then we prosecute others for doing the job.

    Insanity has taken over our land.
    0
  • Old-Colts
    Good deal!!!!!!!!!
    0
  • shilowar
    Well if he's not guilty then perhaps the men that plotted against him should be investigated and prosecuted. LIkely to get time served for the one conviction, perhaps a reduction in rank?
    0
  • KenK/84Bravo
    Background Story?
    0
  • Sam06
    Great!

    Now turn him loose and let him kill more ISIL scumbags
    0
  • Junkballer
    wpageabc wrote:
    The gov and country put these soldiers in harms way.

    The exposure to war with no rules and no uniformed enemy and expect perfections unattainable.

    Absolute truth you speak ;)
    0
  • jimdeere
    Sounded more and more like someone was trying to railroad him.
    0
  • shilowar
    jimdeere wrote:
    Sounded more and more like someone was trying to railroad him.

    Yes, sounded like several in his unit did not like his leadership style and conspired to get him locked up for life.
    0
  • Warbirds
    We shouldn?t be killing unarmed prisoners.

    I understand he did not physically do it- per the testimony- but if ISIS put a knife in the neck of one of ours we would find it quite unacceptable.

    None of us will ever really know what happened but one thing that is not in dispute is a prisoner of war in US custody was killed after he was captured and no longer a direct threat.
    0
  • select-fire
    Great News
    0
  • mag00
    Warbirds wrote:
    We shouldn?t be killing unarmed prisoners.

    I understand he did not physically do it- per the testimony- but if ISIS put a knife in the neck of one of ours we would find it quite unacceptable.

    None of us will ever really know what happened but one thing that is not in dispute is a prisoner of war in US custody was killed after he was captured and no longer a direct threat.

    Yeah, and nobodies ever been bitten by a caged snake.
    0
  • shilowar
    Warbirds wrote:
    We shouldn?t be killing unarmed prisoners.

    I understand he did not physically do it- per the testimony- but if ISIS put a knife in the neck of one of ours we would find it quite unacceptable.

    None of us will ever really know what happened but one thing that is not in dispute is a prisoner of war in US custody was killed after he was captured and no longer a direct threat.
    Well then The JAG better continue their investigation because this patsy didn't kill him, a jury determined that fact.
    0
  • Don McManus
    Warbirds wrote:
    We shouldn?t be killing unarmed prisoners.

    I understand he did not physically do it- per the testimony- but if ISIS put a knife in the neck of one of ours we would find it quite unacceptable.

    None of us will ever really know what happened but one thing that is not in dispute is a prisoner of war in US custody was killed after he was captured and no longer a direct threat.

    Agreed, Warbirds.

    It seems fairly well established that at a minimum he did stab the iswas puke. Not acceptable behavior from a member of the US Armed Forces. Interesting that this was not one of the charges against him.

    While I have no problem with a member of iswas being dead, and there is probably some truth to the story of the corpsman that he would have died a much worse death in the hands of the Iraqi government, there is a line that individuals of the US Armed Forces should not cross. It appears that Gallagher crossed this line, and while I somewhat sympathize with the application of the concept of jury nullification in this case, I also believe that there is no place in our military for this man, and it is right that he has been removed.
    0
  • WearyTraveler
    Warbirds wrote:
    We shouldn?t be killing unarmed prisoners.

    I understand he did not physically do it- per the testimony- but if ISIS put a knife in the neck of one of ours we would find it quite unacceptable.

    None of us will ever really know what happened but one thing that is not in dispute is a prisoner of war in US custody was killed after he was captured and no longer a direct threat.

    I agree. Once a prisoner and no longer a threat - treat him as harsh as you want. But there?s that line that must not be crossed.
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity