Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

Capt Brett Crozier USN

Comments

27 comments

  • Don McManus

    He effectively published the fact that one of our premier naval assets in a forward position was in distress and potentionally of diminished capability. His crew support him, and his motives may have been noble, but it was a significant security breech.


    SecNav had a tough decision from a PR standpoint, but no real choice other than the one that was made.

    3
  • chiefr
    I agree Don. I served and during my service was constantly reminded and tested semi annually on OPSEC and COMSEC.
    Crozier is an O-6. IMHO he should face a GCM. 
    0
  • navc130
    The Readiness Condition of a military unit, in this case a ship, is classified information.  If he revealed that he broke the regulation.  Whether circumstances dictated that his action was necessary will have to be determined. 
    0
  • Sam06
    Is toast.

    He should face a GCM reduced in rank and booted.
    0
  • Warbirds

    The minute I read the “breaking story” I knew he would be relieved.

    This was intentional by him.

    He made the choice to pull into Vietnam (where they were exposed).

    The last thing I would personally want if I was at sea on that ship is for my family to wake up and read we are all about to die on CNN.


    He should have stayed at sea and kept his mouth shut.

    0
  • SW0320
    chiefr said:
    He was fired for a 4 page memo describing conditions on the US Aircraft Carrier Theodore Roosevelt relative to the Chinese virus. The memo was sent out to a number of recipients  via unsecured email. Consequently the email was leaked to the media.  

    There is several stories on Drudge relative to Capt Crozier
    One story I saw said that besides being sent unsecured he did not send it to his immediate supervisor in the chain of command.


    0
  • chiefr
    SW0320 said:
    chiefr said:
    He was fired for a 4 page memo describing conditions on the US Aircraft Carrier Theodore Roosevelt relative to the Chinese virus. The memo was sent out to a number of recipients  via unsecured email. Consequently the email was leaked to the media.  

    There is several stories on Drudge relative to Capt Crozier
    One story I saw said that besides being sent unsecured he did not send it to his immediate supervisor in the chain of command.


    Yep no one in his chain of command COC knew of the letter until they heard about it on the news. If I was atop in his COC, I would be furious.  
    Of course, DEMOCRATS and their media sycophants are calling him a hero, politicizing the debacle, and using the event to attack Trump. 
     
    3
  • pulsarnc

    While his intentions appear to have been good , his lapse of common sense was inexcusable. Relieving him was the right thing to do . Hope he enjoys retirement!

    0
  • 4205raymond
    He is toast. GCM. Where is common sense? Maybe Dummycrats made him a better offer. Something smells here.
    0
  • spasmcreeksrun
    are ye sure he wasn't set up???  seems to simple stupid mistake .....
    0
  • yoshmyster

    Funny how his loose lips didn't sink the ship but his career... I think dude blew his load too early. I was imagining the deck was covered with seamen keeling over. Had he waited and ran it up the chain it would've been worse. His crew was put before him.

    0
  • Don McManus
    yoshmyster said:

    Funny how his loose lips didn't sink the ship but his career... I think dude blew his load too early. I was imagining the deck was covered with seamen keeling over. Had he waited and ran it up the chain it would've been worse. His crew was put before him.

    Not sure how 'blew his load' and 'deck covered with seamen' is helpful at this point.

    Don

    3
  • Ricci.Wright
    And so begins his career with CNN.
    6
  • KenK/84Bravo
    Don McManus: 33192387121435/comments/
    yoshmyster said:

    Funny how his loose lips didn't sink the ship but his career... I think dude blew his load too early. I was imagining the deck was covered with seamen keeling over. Had he waited and ran it up the chain it would've been worse. His crew was put before him.

    Not sure how 'blew his load' and 'deck covered with seamen' is helpful at this point.

    Don

    Yeah, I read that and chuckled to myself also Don.

    3
  • Warbirds
    chiefr: 33192387121435/comments/33192415803163
    SW0320 said:
    chiefr said:
    He was fired for a 4 page memo describing conditions on the US Aircraft Carrier Theodore Roosevelt relative to the Chinese virus. The memo was sent out to a number of recipients  via unsecured email. Consequently the email was leaked to the media.  

    There is several stories on Drudge relative to Capt Crozier
    One story I saw said that besides being sent unsecured he did not send it to his immediate supervisor in the chain of command.


    Yep no one in his chain of command COC knew of the letter until they heard about it on the news. If I was atop in his COC, I would be furious.  
    Of course, DEMOCRATS and their media sycophants are calling him a hero, politicizing the debacle, and using the event to attack Trump. 
     

    The Navy isn’t really getting a fair shake with their side of the story.

    Statement From SECNAV on Relief of CO Aboard USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN 71)
    Statement from the Acting Secretary of the Navy, Thomas B. Modly, regarding the relief of the Commanding Officer of the USS Theodore Roosevelt.


    0
  • Frogdog

    I'll say this - you only get to fall on your sword once.....so it better be worth it.

    Maybe it was, maybe it wasn't. I wasn't there, so I couldn't say. I can say this, however. If I were in command, I would do whatever I felt necessary to protect my crew, first and foremost.


    🐸

    6
  • 4205raymond
    I was Westy's driver at the Point, I knew when to keep my mouth shut and I knew the Chain of Command. Just a lowly GI and probably should not comment on this Navy matter.  I read the entire letter by Modly and I think he crossed all his T's and dotted all his I's. The Captain is toast. Very Sad.
    0
  • select-fire
    He could also be the fall guy.
    0
  • shilowar

    He effectively published the fact that one of our premier naval assets in a forward position was in distress and potentionally of diminished capability. His crew support him, and his motives may have been noble, but it was a significant security breech.


    SecNav had a tough decision from a PR standpoint, but no real choice other than the one that was made.

    Bingo, there is a chain of command for a reason, the media loves to ignore this.  He should have known what he was doing would get him fired.  Noble choice if he were truthfully being ignored, but the outcome should not have been a surprise.
    0
  • serf
    The chain of command is what the military is about. Yet the top brass is rewriting the rules of engagement on viral viruses as we
      speak yet they are not judged because they are the head. You should never play with mobility with viruses in the military. Just go ask them at Ft. Detrick for a refresher course.
                                                                                      serf
     Many experiments that tested various biological agents on human subjects, referred to as Operation Whitecoat, were carried out at Fort Detrick, Maryland, in the 1950s. The human subjects originally consisted of volunteer enlisted men. However, after the enlisted men staged a sitdown strike to obtain more information about the dangers of the biological tests, Seventh-day Adventists (SDAs) who were conscientious objectors were recruited for the studies.[10]

    0
  • He Dog
    I think one way or the other, his crew loved him.  I will take that over whatever the Sec of the Navy says.  In my view the SecNav should take a swim.  From about half way between Tahiti and LA.
    0
  • Don McManus
    I disagree, He Dog.
    Having a crew love you is good, but it is does not override one's duty to protocol.

    That said, Acting Navy Secretary Modly appears to be an idiot.  Apparently he specifically called Cozier 'either too naive or stupid' to captain the Roosevelt in a speech to the crew the day after Cozier left the ship.  Moldly is a Naval Academy graduate and flew helicopters for the USN for 6 or 7 years.  For him speak in such an unprofessional manner clearly demonstrates he is too stupid to be Secretary of the Navy.
    He made the right decision in relieving Cozier.  He has clouded that decision by a childish outburst in response to the crew's show of support for their captain.
    Trump needs to make sure this clown stops acting as SecNav, and the sooner the better, but he should let the decision to relieve Cozier stand.
    9
  • 4205raymond
    Don, +10, Modly went a bridge too far!
    0
  • 4205raymond
    After mulling it over and not being a Navy guy was not the "Stick" the tip of our Spear. Spilling the beans to the world by the Capt is about as close as you can get to leaking a "Battle Order"
    0
  • Mr. Perfect
    I was shocked when I read what Modly said!
    That dude needs to GO...and right now!

    He's gone now. And hopefully the door won't hit his ass on the way out. Dude made the right decision regarding the captain, but acted like a total jackwad thereafter.



    3
  • KenK/84Bravo

    Glad to hear Modly is gone. That was a completely BS move to say that to Capt. Croziers crew.

    Personally, I believe Capt. Crozier was trying to look out for his crew. Perhaps not in the correct manner, but that was his goal.

    I am sure his Crew, feels admirably about him. (As I would, if I was assigned under him.)

    0
  • pulsarnc

    Modly’s comments were uncalled for and totally unacceptable for someone in his position . Right move removing the captain but then he had to run his mouth! At least he had the guts to apologize and resign when he came to his senses. Never ceases to amaze me how stupid some educated people are🤪

    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity