Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

The Texas Ranger's And Samuel Colt

Comments

5 comments

  • buschmaster
    I guess that last part is why they didn't have 10-shot 9mm revolvers
    0
  • yoshmyster
    buschmaster wrote:
    I guess that last part is why they didn't have 10-shot 9mm revolvers

    Moon clips don't hold 10 rounds?
    0
  • Brookwood
    Weighing in at just under 5 Lbs. that old revolver made a ranger have to tighten up his belt a notch or two to keep his pants on! :D

    Just kidding. They actually carried them in pairs in saddle holsters on their horses. I have held an original Colt Walker in my hand and it was an awesome experience. Have also owned and shot a couple of replicas.
    0
  • hillbille
    guess that answers the 9mm vs 45 question.........
    0
  • Warbirds
    buschmaster wrote:
    I guess that last part is why they didn't have 10-shot 9mm revolvers


    There is no way in hell you would rather carry a SAA in 44-40 than a Glock 17 in 9mm into a gunfight.

    What Colt really accomplished with this was improving manufacturing processes and being the first to be good at mass production of pistols.
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity