Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

Comments

16 comments

  • Warbirds
    That is CGI and if you look closely ?Bosstown Dynamics? which they want to draw people to believe is Boston Dynamics.
    0
  • SG
    Warbirds wrote:
    That is CGI and if you look closely ?Bosstown Dynamics? which they want to draw people to believe is Boston Dynamics.

    Yessir,it is CGI for sure but the fact of it is that the technology is there and this will eventually be a reality.
    0
  • Sam06
    That violates Asimov's 3 rules of robotics:

    Asimov?s Three Laws are as follows:

    A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
    A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
    A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Laws.
    0
  • Warbirds
    I hate to break it to you- but this ship has sailed.
    Sam06 wrote:
    That violates Asimov's 3 rules of robotics:

    Asimov?s Three Laws are as follows:

    A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
    A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
    A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Laws.
    0
  • Sam06
    I guess I should have used green font ;)
    0
  • Ricci Wright
    One gallon of salt water will take care of that. :mrgreen:
    0
  • hillbille
    wouldn't an EMP pulse take them out????????
    0
  • Sam06
    Ricci Wright wrote:
    One gallon of salt water will take care of that. :mrgreen:

    I was going to say down load MS outlook and it would crash in seconds.
    0
  • spasmcreek
    wonder which scifi movies the future will look back and say ..."yep, they were right"
    0
  • Ricci Wright
    Ken wants one he can program to go to taco bell and back.
    0
  • TRAP55
    Ricci Wright wrote:
    Ken wants one he can program to go to taco bell and back.
    Won't work, if it follows those three laws. :mrgreen:
    0
  • yoshmyster
    Here I thought it was the kids born in 2001 joining the military.
    0
  • KenK/84Bravo
    Ricci Wright wrote:
    Ken wants one he can program to go to taco bell and back.



    Nah,...................................................for what one of those would cost, you could hit Taco Bell every couple days for life, and still have $$ left over.

    Besides, If I hit Taco Bell, it is on the way home from work - when I pass them. No extra trip required.
    0
  • 11b6r
    They are going to need robots. Right now, 70% of the enlistment age population in the US is not ELIGIBLE to enlist.

    Unable to meet standards- physical, mental, emotional, moral.

    Overweight, out of shape, heavily medicated, nuttier than squirrel poop, stoners, longer record than Al Capone, uneducated.

    Leaving the 30% that ARE qualified thinking "For Christ's sake- you want me to protect THEM?"
    0
  • KenK/84Bravo
    11b6r wrote:
    They are going to need robots. Right now, 70% of the enlistment age population in the US is not ELIGIBLE to enlist.

    Unable to meet standards- physical, mental, emotional, moral.

    Overweight, out of shape, heavily medicated, nuttier than squirrel poop, stoners, longer record than Al Capone, uneducated.

    Leaving the 30% that ARE qualified thinking "For Christ's sake- you want me to protect THEM?"



    I have said to many acquaintances, If we get in deep Sheeit, we are going to be Screwed. The resolve and the fitness level of those in that age range, is abysmal.

    Unless us "Older Folk," step up, we will be well and truly screwed.
    0
  • montanajoe
    • Community moderator
    scary
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity