The Climate Change Hoax
https://townhall.com/columnists/kurtschlichter/2019/09/09/climate-change-is-a-hoax-n2552748?utm_source=thdaily&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&newsletterad=09/09/2019&bcid=c73635c56f183ff51b271db35803e813&recip=18963207
?Climate Change? Is A Hoax
Kurt SchlichterKurt Schlichter|Posted: Sep 09, 2019 12:01 AM
The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent the views of Townhall.com.
I hate science, evidently, because I?m woke to the manifest truth about what the leftist elite currently calls ?climate change." It is the second most staggering fraud ever perpetrated upon the American people after the media?s promotion of the unstoppable candidacy of Beto (who is a furry). Like some suckers still do, I once believed that ?science? was a rigorous process where you tested theories and revised those theories in response to objective evidence. But in today?s shabby practice, ?science? is just a package of self-serving lies buttressing the transnational liberal elite?s preferred narrative. Our alleged betters hope that labeling their propaganda ?science? will science-shame you into silence about what everyone knows is a scam.
Nah. ?Climate change? is a hoax. Come arrest me for felony denial.
Understand that the term ?climate change? does not refer to actual meteorological phenomena but, rather, to the sordid rat-king of lies, scams and power grabs that we are commanded to accept as pagan gospel lest we burn to a crisp or drown or suffer...whatever the Armageddon du jour is. When you say ?climate change is a grift,? and you should as often as possible, you are pointing out that this green-on-the-outside/red-on-the-inside fake frenzy is really just a set of intertwined grifts transparently designed to separate you from your freedom and your property in the name of somehow adjusting the weather.
Observing that ?climate change? is steaming garbage served in a dirty ashtray is not disputing that the climate changes. That the climate is not static, and never could be static, is one of the myriad reasons that this whole idea is ridiculous. The planet gets hotter, it gets colder, sometimes quickly, sometimes over eons, and there are a bunch of reasons why, like the sun and volcanos. Human-produced carbon might be one of the factors, but there?s simply no evidence that it is a significant one. Of course, if they really cared about carbon, they would be up in arms about China and India, which are upping their output while we are slashing ours. Yet the object of their ire is your New York strip. Gosh, does that seem consistent with 1) someone truly concerned about atmospheric carbon, or 2) someone who trembles with joy at the notion of bossing around you rubes out in gun/Jesusland?
The underlying premise of their claims seems to be that there is a ?right? temperature for the earth; watch them sputter when you enquire about that perfect setting for Earth?s thermostat. Remember, if you ask questions you hate ?science.? If they did stop telling you how you hate ?science? long enough to respond, they might explain that of course there?s no perfect temperature ? it?s not like LA, where it?s always 72 degrees.
But then, what are they comparing the present climate to in order to declare that our climate is ?getting worse?? If you establish a climate baseline, then you can compare what?s actually happening to the baseline and that might demonstrate that the whole thing is baloney. That would be awkward. It happened after Katrina. Oh, Katrina?s proof positive that Gaia is really ticked off and?and?and?then we had a bunch of years without much hurricane action at all. You might think that this would be evidence that maybe the climate wasn?t in chaos, and that they would be happy to be proven wrong, but no, it doesn?t work that way. Every time the weather fits the narrative, you see, it?s proof that the climate kooks are right, and every time the weather fails to fit the narrative, well, weather?s not climate. At least until the next heat wave or storm; then weather will totally be climate again.
Heads, you must give us all your freedom and money, and also tails, you must give us all your freedom and money.
Now, we?re being told that we?re all going to die in?I guess we?re down to what? About 11.5 years this go ?round? Of course, we?ve been told many times that we?re doomed and the deadlines have come and gone with the doomsdayers not missing a beat. They?re like old timey Elmer Gantrys promising the apocalypse over and over again, with their hardcore true believers regularly showing up for the rapture over and over again no matter how many times the Four Horseman fail to turn up.
We haven?t even seen one horseman.
Back in the 70s, I remember we were promised an ice age if we didn?t give liberals our money and freedom. Then in the 80s, we were promised death by ozone hole if we didn?t give liberals our money and freedom, and then doom by acid rain if we didn?t give liberals our money and freedom. By the time they started promising that we were all gonna die from global warming if we didn?t give liberals our money and freedom, I was still wanting my ice age. It would be nice to have a white Christmas in LA.
So, where?s my damn ice age?
Oh right, only a climate denier ? Climate, I deny thee! ? might wonder why we should hand over one, ten, a hundred trillion bucks to people who have never once been right about their predictions. You evidently hate ?science? if you expect the ?science? people to be correct at least one time in a half-century.
And they?re not even good at short-term prognostication. Heck, for several days Hurricane Dorian was supposed to slam head on into Florida and then?it didn?t. The Obamas just bought a $15 million pad on the beach ? what?s that say about their faith in ?science?? But don?t worry, the guys batting .000 so far will definitely get the temperature in 2119 right if we only just write them a huge check and transform ourselves from citizens to serfs.
That?s another big red flag ? have you noticed how ?science? always tells us that the only possible response to the climate hullabaloo is to give liberals exactly what they always wanted anyway? How lucky are the leftists to have had an existential problem drop in their laps where the only solution is to give them everything they could not otherwise convince us to give them? What a remarkable coincidence!
And what?s also weird is how nothing that we must do right now no time to debate it?s a crisis think o? the children in any way inconveniences or calls for sacrifices from our climate crisis-pushing elite. Boy, they really scored with climate change ? if they were going to manufacture a crisis in order to get the power and money they craved, how would they do it any differently?
Now, they might claim that they too will have to sacrifice to the Angry Weather Demon, but it?s unclear how. I suppose they might stop flying across the globe to climate finger-wagging festivals in private jets, but call me jaded for thinking that if it?s such a crisis today and they have not stopped doing it yet, they won?t stop jetting about down the road. Oh, but you will. You most definitely will stop flying and driving the vehicles you choose and eating cheeseburgers and using straws that don?t disintegrate into gummy sludge in your Dr. Pepper. But them? Pete Buttigieg explained away his zipping around in Gulfstreams as necessary because it is important for him to be pestering people in Des Moines. Bet you that pretty much everything our betters want to do will turn out to be ?important.? And I?ll bet that nothing what you peasants want to do will.
One might think that if stopping carbon was important, you might want to explore nuclear power. But you would think wrong. After all, if there?s plenty of electrical power, the elite loses the political power that comes from divvying up a scarce resource. If they control the power, they control you. Cheap, plentiful power makes you freer, which is a bug, not a feature.
Oh, and those many millions of people in Middle America who directly or indirectly rely on fracking and the rest of the fossil fuel industry? Even bloody-eyed, Gaffe-atronic Joe 3000 wants to shaft you. Better learn to code or something, because your good job is history. Weird how all the sacrifice once again falls on those out in the hinterlands and not on the blue coastal city swells, huh? But you?ll be able to rest easy knowing that our moral superiors in Brooklyn and Alexandria and Santa Monica enjoyed showing you sweaty rubes who?s really the boss by impoverishing you. Because that, and not the weather in a century, is and always has been what the ?climate change? hoax is really all about.
If you want to read a vivid account of what happens if the Democrats succeed and manage to enslave us through weather inquisitions or disarming those of us who don?t commit crimes or however, check out my action-packed yet hilarious novels, People's Republic, Indian Country and Wildfire. People you despise for being cruise-shilling grifter dweebs called these tomes ?appalling.? Can there be a greater endorsement?
?Climate Change? Is A Hoax
Kurt SchlichterKurt Schlichter|Posted: Sep 09, 2019 12:01 AM
The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent the views of Townhall.com.
I hate science, evidently, because I?m woke to the manifest truth about what the leftist elite currently calls ?climate change." It is the second most staggering fraud ever perpetrated upon the American people after the media?s promotion of the unstoppable candidacy of Beto (who is a furry). Like some suckers still do, I once believed that ?science? was a rigorous process where you tested theories and revised those theories in response to objective evidence. But in today?s shabby practice, ?science? is just a package of self-serving lies buttressing the transnational liberal elite?s preferred narrative. Our alleged betters hope that labeling their propaganda ?science? will science-shame you into silence about what everyone knows is a scam.
Nah. ?Climate change? is a hoax. Come arrest me for felony denial.
Understand that the term ?climate change? does not refer to actual meteorological phenomena but, rather, to the sordid rat-king of lies, scams and power grabs that we are commanded to accept as pagan gospel lest we burn to a crisp or drown or suffer...whatever the Armageddon du jour is. When you say ?climate change is a grift,? and you should as often as possible, you are pointing out that this green-on-the-outside/red-on-the-inside fake frenzy is really just a set of intertwined grifts transparently designed to separate you from your freedom and your property in the name of somehow adjusting the weather.
Observing that ?climate change? is steaming garbage served in a dirty ashtray is not disputing that the climate changes. That the climate is not static, and never could be static, is one of the myriad reasons that this whole idea is ridiculous. The planet gets hotter, it gets colder, sometimes quickly, sometimes over eons, and there are a bunch of reasons why, like the sun and volcanos. Human-produced carbon might be one of the factors, but there?s simply no evidence that it is a significant one. Of course, if they really cared about carbon, they would be up in arms about China and India, which are upping their output while we are slashing ours. Yet the object of their ire is your New York strip. Gosh, does that seem consistent with 1) someone truly concerned about atmospheric carbon, or 2) someone who trembles with joy at the notion of bossing around you rubes out in gun/Jesusland?
The underlying premise of their claims seems to be that there is a ?right? temperature for the earth; watch them sputter when you enquire about that perfect setting for Earth?s thermostat. Remember, if you ask questions you hate ?science.? If they did stop telling you how you hate ?science? long enough to respond, they might explain that of course there?s no perfect temperature ? it?s not like LA, where it?s always 72 degrees.
But then, what are they comparing the present climate to in order to declare that our climate is ?getting worse?? If you establish a climate baseline, then you can compare what?s actually happening to the baseline and that might demonstrate that the whole thing is baloney. That would be awkward. It happened after Katrina. Oh, Katrina?s proof positive that Gaia is really ticked off and?and?and?then we had a bunch of years without much hurricane action at all. You might think that this would be evidence that maybe the climate wasn?t in chaos, and that they would be happy to be proven wrong, but no, it doesn?t work that way. Every time the weather fits the narrative, you see, it?s proof that the climate kooks are right, and every time the weather fails to fit the narrative, well, weather?s not climate. At least until the next heat wave or storm; then weather will totally be climate again.
Heads, you must give us all your freedom and money, and also tails, you must give us all your freedom and money.
Now, we?re being told that we?re all going to die in?I guess we?re down to what? About 11.5 years this go ?round? Of course, we?ve been told many times that we?re doomed and the deadlines have come and gone with the doomsdayers not missing a beat. They?re like old timey Elmer Gantrys promising the apocalypse over and over again, with their hardcore true believers regularly showing up for the rapture over and over again no matter how many times the Four Horseman fail to turn up.
We haven?t even seen one horseman.
Back in the 70s, I remember we were promised an ice age if we didn?t give liberals our money and freedom. Then in the 80s, we were promised death by ozone hole if we didn?t give liberals our money and freedom, and then doom by acid rain if we didn?t give liberals our money and freedom. By the time they started promising that we were all gonna die from global warming if we didn?t give liberals our money and freedom, I was still wanting my ice age. It would be nice to have a white Christmas in LA.
So, where?s my damn ice age?
Oh right, only a climate denier ? Climate, I deny thee! ? might wonder why we should hand over one, ten, a hundred trillion bucks to people who have never once been right about their predictions. You evidently hate ?science? if you expect the ?science? people to be correct at least one time in a half-century.
And they?re not even good at short-term prognostication. Heck, for several days Hurricane Dorian was supposed to slam head on into Florida and then?it didn?t. The Obamas just bought a $15 million pad on the beach ? what?s that say about their faith in ?science?? But don?t worry, the guys batting .000 so far will definitely get the temperature in 2119 right if we only just write them a huge check and transform ourselves from citizens to serfs.
That?s another big red flag ? have you noticed how ?science? always tells us that the only possible response to the climate hullabaloo is to give liberals exactly what they always wanted anyway? How lucky are the leftists to have had an existential problem drop in their laps where the only solution is to give them everything they could not otherwise convince us to give them? What a remarkable coincidence!
And what?s also weird is how nothing that we must do right now no time to debate it?s a crisis think o? the children in any way inconveniences or calls for sacrifices from our climate crisis-pushing elite. Boy, they really scored with climate change ? if they were going to manufacture a crisis in order to get the power and money they craved, how would they do it any differently?
Now, they might claim that they too will have to sacrifice to the Angry Weather Demon, but it?s unclear how. I suppose they might stop flying across the globe to climate finger-wagging festivals in private jets, but call me jaded for thinking that if it?s such a crisis today and they have not stopped doing it yet, they won?t stop jetting about down the road. Oh, but you will. You most definitely will stop flying and driving the vehicles you choose and eating cheeseburgers and using straws that don?t disintegrate into gummy sludge in your Dr. Pepper. But them? Pete Buttigieg explained away his zipping around in Gulfstreams as necessary because it is important for him to be pestering people in Des Moines. Bet you that pretty much everything our betters want to do will turn out to be ?important.? And I?ll bet that nothing what you peasants want to do will.
One might think that if stopping carbon was important, you might want to explore nuclear power. But you would think wrong. After all, if there?s plenty of electrical power, the elite loses the political power that comes from divvying up a scarce resource. If they control the power, they control you. Cheap, plentiful power makes you freer, which is a bug, not a feature.
Oh, and those many millions of people in Middle America who directly or indirectly rely on fracking and the rest of the fossil fuel industry? Even bloody-eyed, Gaffe-atronic Joe 3000 wants to shaft you. Better learn to code or something, because your good job is history. Weird how all the sacrifice once again falls on those out in the hinterlands and not on the blue coastal city swells, huh? But you?ll be able to rest easy knowing that our moral superiors in Brooklyn and Alexandria and Santa Monica enjoyed showing you sweaty rubes who?s really the boss by impoverishing you. Because that, and not the weather in a century, is and always has been what the ?climate change? hoax is really all about.
If you want to read a vivid account of what happens if the Democrats succeed and manage to enslave us through weather inquisitions or disarming those of us who don?t commit crimes or however, check out my action-packed yet hilarious novels, People's Republic, Indian Country and Wildfire. People you despise for being cruise-shilling grifter dweebs called these tomes ?appalling.? Can there be a greater endorsement?
0
-
[media][ 
/media]0 -
love this guys columns, read it ever chance I get. He tell it like it is with a sarcastic twist. 0 -
John Ward nails it again. Instead of emitting beta particles they're emitting beta retardicles. https://youtu.be/hjcdMU2itv80 -
And now we know why the hurricanes hitting the Carib and the East coast are smaller than ever, why there are fewer tornados these days and why most of the gunbroker population stays far, far from the edge of the earth and reality. Yep, he says it all. Good old pseudoscience to the rescue. Almost as good as Trump's fake news. 0 -
How about this guy who says eating people will help curb climate change :shock:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7443707/Swedish-scientist-says-humans-cannibals-fight-climate-change.html
C&P
A solution to tackling climate change is to eat human flesh from dead bodies, a Swedish scientist has claimed.
Professor Magnus Soderlund, of Stockholm School of Economics, believes practicing cannibalism might save the planet if society were to 'awaken to the idea'.
Speaking on Swedish television, he suggested dead bodies would be more sustainable than the meat and dairy industry - or even eating insects - if food sources become scarce in the future.
This is going a bit too far IMO.
just saying0 -
Nobodies denying that the earths getting warmer, which is causing the severe weather. The question is are we causing it? Scientists who studied climate change before the global warming theories are saying that theres a lot of money being thrown around only to the scientists that come to the conclusion that WE ARE causing it. Good science is being ignored if it does'nt come to the conclusions that the people with the money want.He Dog wrote:And now we know why the hurricanes hitting the Carib and the East coast are smaller than ever, why there are fewer tornados these days and why most of the gunbroker population stays far, far from the edge of the earth and reality. Yep, he says it all. Good old pseudoscience to the rescue. Almost as good as Trump's fake news.0 -
and where starving people actually serve less to those desperately needing soylent green...oops missed lunch again ...and the menu was elbows 0
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Comments
7 comments